Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Random Rants
|
|
Muppets Riding Without Bike Lights |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2014, 08:15 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103
|
QUOTE (Man in orange hat @ Dec 1 2014, 08:51 AM) What if it had been an unlit pedestrian? Pedestrians should take the same precautions. I wouldn't walk along an unlit country road in black clothing with no light. QUOTE (Man in orange hat @ Dec 1 2014, 08:51 AM) If you were only two or three seconds away, you were going too fast for the conditions. I knew someone would say that. The conditions were..............dark!! What speed should one do on an unlit country road? I was doing approximately 30. I am amazed that people will defend and obvious unsafe and illegal act!! (Please bear in mind that there are some drivers out there who cannot see to read a blatant road sign telling them not cross a bridge even in broad daylight!! )
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2 2014, 04:49 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 2,674
Joined: 27-November 12
Member No.: 8,961
|
QUOTE (Biker1 @ Dec 1 2014, 08:15 AM) Pedestrians should take the same precautions. I wouldn't walk along an unlit country road in black clothing with no light. I knew someone would say that. The conditions were..............dark!! What speed should one do on an unlit country road? I was doing approximately 30. I am amazed that people will defend and obvious unsafe and illegal act!! (Please bear in mind that there are some drivers out there who cannot see to read a blatant road sign telling them not cross a bridge even in broad daylight!! ) The thing is though that your posts betray a resentment towards cyclists and a laissez-faire attitude towards your responsibility as a car user towards their safety.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2 2014, 06:37 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103
|
QUOTE (newres @ Dec 2 2014, 05:49 PM) The thing is though that your posts betray a resentment towards cyclists Incorrect. I have a resentment towards inconsiderate, law breaking cyclists. QUOTE (newres @ Dec 2 2014, 05:49 PM) and a laissez-faire attitude towards your responsibility as a car user towards their safety. Incorrect. I would NEVER deliberately put a cyclist, law breaker or not, in danger through my driving / riding.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2 2014, 07:19 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (HJD @ Dec 2 2014, 06:50 PM) I'm sure a lot of these car owners would welcome your advice on where else you think they can legally park !! Oh dear, that debate again! I must admit, I'm a bit big these days but none too steady on my feet....so if my trolley gets a bit to close to these obstructions, can I help it? See what I mean Hatter old son, specially when it's dark!
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2 2014, 09:35 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,605
Joined: 25-November 09
Member No.: 511
|
QUOTE (The Hatter @ Dec 2 2014, 05:07 PM) Some car drivers think they can do just what they want just because they pay a few pounds road tax. My GF lives off Pear Tree Lane and we walk to and from town. Some times it is pretty hard to keep on the pavement because of parked cars and it's pretty bad on the estate roads and Kiln Hill. They even park on the grass verge digging it up and making a mess. People parking on pavements are a bigger danger at night than a few bikes without lights. LIKE!!
--------------------
There their, loose loser!
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2 2014, 11:00 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 2,682
Joined: 23-September 10
From: In the lower 40
Member No.: 1,104
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Dec 2 2014, 07:19 PM) Oh dear, that debate again!
I must admit, I'm a bit big these days but none too steady on my feet....so if my trolley gets a bit to close to these obstructions, can I help it? See what I mean Hatter old son, specially when it's dark! Oh dear, yet another thinly veiled and clumsy threat of criminal damage, wonder if you would be happy repeating that whilst under caution?
--------------------
Gammon. And proud!
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2014, 07:05 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (Turin Machine @ Dec 2 2014, 11:00 PM) Oh dear, yet another thinly veiled and clumsy threat of criminal damage, wonder if you would be happy repeating that whilst under caution? What are you going to do if I said yes all I'm doing is pointing out that accidents happen what's more, personally I don't take care when passing obstructions in the pavement be they cars or intruding shrubs. The only muppets I see in this debate are those that think driving a car gives then an absolute right to do just what they want and the right to criticise anyone else who gets in their way. Irresponsible parking, legal or not, is just as offensive as using a bike improperly.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2014, 03:04 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,605
Joined: 25-November 09
Member No.: 511
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Dec 3 2014, 07:05 AM) What are you going to do if I said yes all I'm doing is pointing out that accidents happen what's more, personally I don't take care when passing obstructions in the pavement be they cars or intruding shrubs. The only muppets I see in this debate are those that think driving a car gives then an absolute right to do just what they want and the right to criticise anyone else who gets in their way. Irresponsible parking, legal or not, is just as offensive as using a bike improperly. Well said,.
--------------------
There their, loose loser!
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2014, 03:45 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,970
Joined: 29-December 09
From: Dogging in a car park somewhere
Member No.: 592
|
QUOTE (Biker1 @ Dec 2 2014, 06:37 PM) I would NEVER deliberately put a cyclist, law breaker or not, in danger through my driving / riding. I would.
--------------------
:p Grammar: the difference between knowing your poop and knowing you're poop.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2014, 04:06 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Dec 3 2014, 08:05 AM) The only muppets I see in this debate are those that think driving a car gives then an absolute right to do just what they want and the right to criticise anyone else who gets in their way. Who are they then?? QUOTE (The Hatter @ Dec 2 2014, 06:07 PM) People parking on pavements are a bigger danger at night than a few bikes without lights. I'd say they were a menace rather than a danger. And certainly not as dangerous as riding a bike at night without lights which not, as you say, a few do, but many do.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2014, 06:11 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 2,674
Joined: 27-November 12
Member No.: 8,961
|
QUOTE (motormad @ Dec 3 2014, 03:45 PM) I would. Seriously? You would put knock cyclist down because they had no lights.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2014, 06:13 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 936
Joined: 16-June 12
Member No.: 8,755
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Dec 3 2014, 07:05 AM) What are you going to do if I said yes all I'm doing is pointing out that accidents happen what's more, personally I don't take care when passing obstructions in the pavement be they cars or intruding shrubs. ... Maybe the owner of the car you damage will be similarly careless with his flailing arms which may happen to connect with your face. I don't excpect many would see it more than poetic justice given your attitude.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2014, 07:46 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (MontyPython @ Dec 3 2014, 06:13 PM) Maybe the owner of the car you damage will be similarly careless with his flailing arms which may happen to connect with your face. I don't excpect many would see it more than poetic justice given your attitude. If one puts something where it shouldn't be (a car on a path, obstructing or partially obstructing the may), then I think they can expect an increased risk of damage, deliberate, or otherwise. Of course, two wrongs don't make a right, and no-one is entitled to purposely damage a car for no other reason than 'revenge'.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2014, 10:03 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 936
Joined: 16-June 12
Member No.: 8,755
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Dec 3 2014, 07:46 PM) If one puts something where it shouldn't be (a car on a path, obstructing or partially obstructing the may), then I think they can expect an increased risk of damage, deliberate, or otherwise. Of course, two wrongs don't make a right, and no-one is entitled to purposely damage a car for no other reason than 'revenge'. Exactly 3 wrongs don't make a right - but when OTE puts his trolley where it shouldn't be namely Mr Thug's car he can no doubt expect an increased risk of damage!
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2014, 10:39 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (MontyPython @ Dec 3 2014, 10:03 PM) Exactly 3 wrongs don't make a right - but when OTE puts his trolley where it shouldn't be namely Mr Thug's car he can no doubt expect an increased risk of damage! Oooh don't damage my precious car, the substitution for my manhood!! Yes, I've confronted some anti social packers. Get some interesting comments. As I told one bloke if the firm he was visiting thought him important or useful, they'd have a car parking space reserved for him. And as for someone's fist, yeah go ahead, I could do with the compo.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|