BBC and pay, Laura Kuenssberg Options

[TallDarkAndHands...]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Kuenssberg

Earns more than May and Trump per annum by salary.

Snowflake liberal. Get rid BBC. 👎

[user23]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Kuenssberg

Earns more than May and Trump per annum by salary.

Snowflake liberal. Get rid BBC. 👎

Trunp's salary from his position as President is $1, so most people in the world earn more than him.

[TallDarkAndHands...]

Trunp's salary from his position as President is $1, so most people in the world earn more than him.

She's still on 200k a year and the question she asked was an embarrassment. She said she was speaking on behalf of the uk. Its up to Prime Minister May to speak on behalf of the UK. Not some overpaid ❄ liberal lefty.

[On the edge]

She's still on 200k a year and the question she asked was an embarrassment. She said she was speaking on behalf of the uk. Its up to Prime Minister May to speak on behalf of the UK. Not some overpaid ❄ liberal lefty.

Actually, it's really a management issue. The words she used were incorrect and there should be internal mechanisims for correcting this. We do have a significant and growing problem, excaserbated no doubt by the financial rewards, where news announcers see themselves as celebrities; newsworthy in their own right. They aren't generally even reporters; just performing heads.

Our way of politics today means politicians actually court these people; which gives them a wholly inaccurate view of their own importance. Thus in a self perpetuating oligarchy such as the BBC, we end up with a self appointed squad of people who honestly do believe they 'represent the nation'.

Our fault, we should have clipped the BBC when we had the opportunity - we reap what we sow!

[user23]

Actually, it's really a management issue. The words she used were incorrect and there should be internal mechanisims for correcting this. We do have a significant and growing problem, excaserbated no doubt by the financial rewards, where news announcers see themselves as celebrities; newsworthy in their own right. They aren't generally even reporters; just performing heads.

Our way of politics today means politicians actually court these people; which gives them a wholly inaccurate view of their own importance. Thus in a self perpetuating oligarchy such as the BBC, we end up with a self appointed squad of people who honestly do believe they 'represent the nation'.

Our fault, we should have clipped the BBC when we had the opportunity - we reap what we sow!

Isn't the same true of Peston on ITV, or Boulton on Sky?

I'm not sure muzzling public service news broadcasting would really resolve this, or if it's even an issue.

It would please the likes of Rupert Murdoch and the small number of people who control our traditional media though.