Tommy Robinson, Police State Options

[TallDarkAndHands...]

So Tommy Robinson is now imprsioned for reporting outside the court on the rape trial of an accused 29 men.
His crime? Reporting on a trial where no reporting is allowed.
He will most likely be murdered in prison.
Thousands protesting in Downing St.
And not a word in the news as it is banned from reporting his arrest!
Whether you agree with him or not this turn of events is a worry.

[newres]

He knew there were reporting restrictions and he breached them. He has a suspended sentence doesn’t he? Why should he be above the law?

[TallDarkAndHands...]

He knew there were reporting restrictions and he breached them. He has a suspended sentence doesn’t he? Why should he be above the law?

Why are there reporting restrictions on his arrest and imprisonment?

https://www.change.org/p/theresa-may-mp-free-tommy-robinson

Oh dear hush hush aint working. Imbeciles. You cant hush social media.

[newres]

Why are there reporting restrictions on his arrest and imprisonment?

https://www.change.org/p/theresa-may-mp-free-tommy-robinson

Oh dear hush hush aint working. Imbeciles. You cant hush social media.

The reporting restrictions were on the trial he was “reporting”. I’ve no idea why, but perhaps to protect the identity of some of the victims. Whether you agree with the law or not, you have to accept that if you breach it, you will be in trouble. Leaving aside the political debate that’s it!

[x2lls]

The reporting restrictions were on the trial he was “reporting”. I’ve no idea why, but perhaps to protect the identity of some of the victims. Whether you agree with the law or not, you have to accept that if you breach it, you will be in trouble. Leaving aside the political debate that’s it!

If you took the time to watch the whole event, you will see and hear he asked the police where he could stand. You choose to ignore that fact, conveniently. This is a POLITICAL issue. He has been a thorn for years, so now they attempt to bring in capital punishment through the back door. Lord Pearson was correct in threatening the Home Secretary with legal action if anything happens to him. Why is it that a man who is telling the TRUTH about muslim gangs is jailed in less than 5 hours? I can only assume that your opposition to Tommy Robinson means you agree with sharia, fg
m, the hideous treatment of women and animals and those that do not believe in a **** who rode on a unicorn and shagged an 8 year old.

[On the edge]

If you took the time to watch the whole event, you will see and hear he asked the police where he could stand. You choose to ignore that fact, conveniently. This is a POLITICAL issue. He has been a thorn for years, so now they attempt to bring in capital punishment through the back door. Lord Pearson was correct in threatening the Home Secretary with legal action if anything happens to him. Why is it that a man who is telling the TRUTH about muslim gangs is jailed in less than 5 hours? I can only assume that your opposition to Tommy Robinson means you agree with sharia, fg
m, the hideous treatment of women and animals and those that do not believe in a **** who rode on a unicorn and shagged an 8 year old.

If it's a political issue and I wouldn't disagree that the question he raises is certainly worth serious debate, then to gain any traction at all some input to our political arrangement is necessary. UKIP being an example of a group pursuing a single issue for a long period totally against established thinking; against the odds, they succeeded. They had their own share of extremists who were dealt with by a proper leadership. The only thing they failed to manage was the post success sustainability. So again, Tommy Robinsons approach which seems to hinge simply on public disorder is going to get nowhere fast.

[TallDarkAndHands...]

If it's a political issue and I wouldn't disagree that the question he raises is certainly worth serious debate, then to gain any traction at all some input to our political arrangement is necessary. UKIP being an example of a group pursuing a single issue for a long period totally against established thinking; against the odds, they succeeded. They had their own share of extremists who were dealt with by a proper leadership. The only thing they failed to manage was the post success sustainability. So again, Tommy Robinsons approach which seems to hinge simply on public disorder is going to get nowhere fast.

A lot of people agree with what he is saying even if he may be the wrong person to say it. The trouble is ANYONE, even Jesus Christ himself would be the wrong person to "say it" and would be persecuted.

[On the edge]

A lot of people agree with what he is saying even if he may be the wrong person to say it. The trouble is ANYONE, even Jesus Christ himself would be the wrong person to "say it" and would be persecuted.

Persecuted rather than prosecuted yes, a world of difference. Norman Tebbitt was never afraid to speak out and is still more than willing to say things that go against establishment thinking, as did Enoch Powell. Both had followings, both were and indeed, still are reported but still no substantial movement. Nigel Farage was persecuted and generally rubbished by an establishment who didn't like him at all, nonetheless, he succeeded. So, then, perhaps for Tommy Robinson, the issue is the message as well as the messenger.