IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

11 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Local Elections
Richard Garvie
post Apr 4 2011, 09:38 PM
Post #101


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,974
Joined: 8-September 10
Member No.: 1,076



QUOTE (Simon Kirby @ Apr 4 2011, 09:34 PM) *
You could ask the council, but I don't suppose they'd let you have the list. wink.gif


I saw Graham Hunt tonight, and apparently West Berks have yet to provide it. They are putting together the list for all of the parish councils, so will expect it late tomorrow or Wednesday. Looks like I'm up against your pal in the Parish election!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NorahG
post Apr 5 2011, 08:43 AM
Post #102


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 3-March 11
From: Newbury & Clapham
Member No.: 3,318



QUOTE (Richard Garvie @ Apr 4 2011, 09:38 PM) *
I saw Graham Hunt tonight, and apparently West Berks have yet to provide it. They are putting together the list for all of the parish councils, so will expect it late tomorrow or Wednesday. Looks like I'm up against your pal in the Parish election!!!


Seems not Richard. I think you've been disqualified because of where you live! Good luck to all the candidates. Perhaps the allotment business can be sorted out by the new lot and I can put my application in.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post Apr 5 2011, 09:18 AM
Post #103


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (Richard Garvie @ Apr 4 2011, 03:45 PM) *
So who's bitten the bullet and decided to stand then? We have put forward 30 candidates, but I expect one to be knocked off for not being 18 today, although they will be at the local elections. Apparently that is the rules, so hopefully they are not too upset by it.

If they are too young to stand for election, are they not also too young to be a proposer / seconder?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Criddleback
post Apr 5 2011, 09:44 AM
Post #104


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 58
Joined: 6-March 11
Member No.: 3,387



the Newbury Town Council nominations are now here - with the other West Berkshire parish level nominations.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
oldharry
post Apr 5 2011, 10:43 AM
Post #105


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 4-May 10
Member No.: 877



QUOTE (user23 @ Apr 4 2011, 07:56 PM) *
What implication?

The implication by both you and Strafin that UKIP and the BNP are similar by mentioning them in the same context.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TallDarkAndHands...
post Apr 5 2011, 01:50 PM
Post #106


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (panda @ Mar 19 2011, 12:25 AM) *
Is Richard Garvie going to stand for council in the local elections


It looks like he tried to stand in the Falkland Ward but he is 'Invalid' laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Apr 5 2011, 02:18 PM
Post #107


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (oldharry @ Apr 5 2011, 11:43 AM) *
The implication by both you and Strafin that UKIP and the BNP are similar by mentioning them in the same context.

The similarities are that they are the two parties I would be least likely to vote for.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Richard Garvie
post Apr 5 2011, 03:16 PM
Post #108


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,974
Joined: 8-September 10
Member No.: 1,076



QUOTE (TallDarkAndHandsome @ Apr 5 2011, 01:50 PM) *
It looks like he tried to stand in the Falkland Ward but he is 'Invalid' laugh.gif


I am actually valid to stand in that ward, and I'm not happy about being excluded.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Apr 5 2011, 03:48 PM
Post #109


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Richard Garvie @ Apr 5 2011, 04:16 PM) *
I am actually valid to stand in that ward, and I'm not happy about being excluded.

Why were you deemed 'invalid'?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Richard Garvie
post Apr 5 2011, 04:31 PM
Post #110


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,974
Joined: 8-September 10
Member No.: 1,076



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Apr 5 2011, 03:48 PM) *
Why were you deemed 'invalid'?


It's not because of distance anyway, I think there is an argument over the actual form and whether the second form was filled out correctly. We'll have to wait and see.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Apr 5 2011, 04:40 PM
Post #111


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Richard Garvie @ Apr 5 2011, 05:31 PM) *
It's not because of distance anyway, I think there is an argument over the actual form and whether the second form was filled out correctly. We'll have to wait and see.

What do you have doubt over? Is there a copy of the form on line or anything? 'Invalid' does sound more than a form error.

I suspect it is some form of masonic conspiracy; time for an investigation I think!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Apr 5 2011, 05:08 PM
Post #112


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



I'd have thought councillors would prefer to have Mr Garvie inside the tent, than outside. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post Apr 5 2011, 05:11 PM
Post #113


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (JeffG @ Apr 5 2011, 06:08 PM) *
I'd have thought councillors would prefer to have Mr Garvie inside the tent, than outside. smile.gif


Are you saying RG is p*****g about?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Apr 5 2011, 05:58 PM
Post #114


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



I have just seen on the local news that one prospective candidate for (I think) Christchurch has been ruled out because she put "Candidate for the Labour Party" rather than "Labour Party Candidate" on her form.

I wonder what petty-minded jobsworth made that decision? It seems like it's easier to get an application for an extradition warrant right (and we know how fussy they are), than an application to stand as a local councillor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Apr 5 2011, 06:13 PM
Post #115


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



After reading some of the posts on here from covert councillors, I'm left wondering how some of the successful candidates made it through this initiation process.

Indeed, a while back, dannyboy argued that poor literacy shouldn't be an obstacle for an election candidate. It would seem it can be.

I'll be interested to find out why Richard Garvie got bounced.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cognosco
post Apr 5 2011, 06:31 PM
Post #116


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



QUOTE (JeffG @ Apr 5 2011, 06:58 PM) *
I have just seen on the local news that one prospective candidate for (I think) Christchurch has been ruled out because she put "Candidate for the Labour Party" rather than "Labour Party Candidate" on her form.

I wonder what petty-minded jobsworth made that decision? It seems like it's easier to get an application for an extradition warrant right (and we know how fussy they are), than an application to stand as a local councillor.


I wonder if it would have been the same outcome if a Conservative candidate had filled hers in with Candidate for the Tory party? wink.gif


--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cognosco
post Apr 5 2011, 06:39 PM
Post #117


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Apr 5 2011, 07:13 PM) *
After reading some of the posts on here from covert councillors, I'm left wondering how some of the successful candidates made it through this initiation process.

Indeed, a while back, dannyboy argued that poor literacy shouldn't be an obstacle for an election candidate. It would seem it can be.

I'll be interested to find out why Richard Garvie got bounced.


Well he has got up the nose of the local Mafia. You must realise that is not allowed in Newbury? wink.gif


--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post Apr 5 2011, 06:42 PM
Post #118


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (oldharry @ Apr 5 2011, 11:43 AM) *
The implication by both you and Strafin that UKIP and the BNP are similar by mentioning them in the same context.
This simply isn't true.

If I mentioned chalk and cheese in the same context as I have done here, am I implying they're similar?
QUOTE (TallDarkAndHandsome @ Apr 5 2011, 02:50 PM) *
It looks like he tried to stand in the Falkland Ward but he is 'Invalid' laugh.gif
Whoops! Another gaffe from the Labour Party Campaign Manager, failing to get himself nominated for the Town Council elections. This coming on top of the admission that he couldn't contact 11 of his prospective candidates so they also failed to be nominated for the District Elections.

I suspect the other parties might make political capital of this almighty mess up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Apr 5 2011, 06:42 PM
Post #119


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Cognosco @ Apr 5 2011, 07:39 PM) *
Well he has got up the nose of the local Mafia. You must realise that is not allowed in Newbury? wink.gif

It is either that, or his coordination skills have been fond wanting!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Apr 5 2011, 06:45 PM
Post #120


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (user23 @ Apr 5 2011, 07:42 PM) *
I suspect the other parties might make political capital of this almighty mess up.

What ever happened, the democratic process has been let down. I'm also disappointed that you should choose to be so smug about this considering you seem to champion people trying to get into the local politics.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

11 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th May 2024 - 09:50 AM