IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  « < 7 8 9  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Abbott Shmabbott
TallDarkAndHands...
post Jan 21 2019, 09:26 PM
Post #161


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (Strafin @ Jan 21 2019, 08:19 PM) *
She was dismissed as being wrong and the (impartial bbc) presenter, Fiona Bruce, stopped the discussion, said "No, you are wrong" and allowed someone to continue berating her. That in itself isn't really fair, and not what the programme is supposed to be. But now it is alleged that the audience were "wound up" during the warm up to direct negativity towards her. And not anyone else on the panel.

So imagine it was Farage or Davis or someone and tell me you agree that it is acceptable.


Farage would be portrayed as a right wing nut job by the press even if he converted to the JC cult.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
x2lls
post Jan 21 2019, 11:17 PM
Post #162


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,605
Joined: 25-November 09
Member No.: 511



QUOTE (Strafin @ Jan 21 2019, 08:19 PM) *
She was dismissed as being wrong and the (impartial bbc) presenter, Fiona Bruce, stopped the discussion, said "No, you are wrong" and allowed someone to continue berating her. That in itself isn't really fair, and not what the programme is supposed to be. But now it is alleged that the audience were "wound up" during the warm up to direct negativity towards her. And not anyone else on the panel.

So imagine it was Farage or Davis or someone and tell me you agree that it is acceptable.



Both Farage and Davis are thicker skinned. SHE is the nut job. I shudder to think of her and her ex bedfellow getting into power and taking us goodness knows where.


--------------------
There their, loose loser!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TallDarkAndHands...
post Jan 22 2019, 05:56 AM
Post #163


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (x2lls @ Jan 21 2019, 11:17 PM) *
Both Farage and Davis are thicker skinned. SHE is the nut job. I shudder to think of her and her ex bedfellow getting into power and taking us goodness knows where.

Caracas would be my guess....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Jan 22 2019, 06:48 AM
Post #164


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (Strafin @ Jan 21 2019, 08:19 PM) *
She was dismissed as being wrong and the (impartial bbc) presenter, Fiona Bruce, stopped the discussion, said "No, you are wrong" and allowed someone to continue berating her. That in itself isn't really fair, and not what the programme is supposed to be. But now it is alleged that the audience were "wound up" during the warm up to direct negativity towards her. And not anyone else on the panel.

So imagine it was Farage or Davis or someone and tell me you agree that it is acceptable.

Because she was wrong, people are now looking at someone who aspires to be the home secretary and she simply can't cut it no matter how you slice it. Time after time she's embarrassed the labour hiarchy to the extent she's even been told to cancel interviews. She's had a good run but she ought to realise she's out of her depth.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Strafin
post Jan 22 2019, 07:06 AM
Post #165


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 55



And there's the problem. JSC now thinks she was wrong, because that's the portrayal of her. In spite of evidence to the contrary and plenty information out there, you're now citing something that's not true as a fact. And that is why the complaint should be investigated as the repercussions are too detrimental to ignore it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Jan 22 2019, 07:14 AM
Post #166


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (Strafin @ Jan 22 2019, 07:06 AM) *
And there's the problem. JSC now thinks she was wrong, because that's the portrayal of her. In spite of evidence to the contrary and plenty information out there, you're now citing something that's not true as a fact. And that is why the complaint should be investigated as the repercussions are too detrimental to ignore it.

No, she was wrong.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Jan 22 2019, 07:19 AM
Post #167


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



Although Fiona Bruce is in my opinion a disastrous choice of host, having borked ARS auntie beeb decided to give a heavyweight job to a featherweight.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Strafin
post Jan 22 2019, 01:10 PM
Post #168


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 55



QUOTE (je suis Charlie @ Jan 22 2019, 07:14 AM) *
No, she was wrong.

Can you back that up with anything?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Jan 22 2019, 02:19 PM
Post #169


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (Strafin @ Jan 22 2019, 01:10 PM) *
Can you back that up with anything?

What, you mean the fact she said labour were in the lead and Ms Bruce was looking at a poll "issued by Downing St"? The FACT that several INDEPENDENT polls in the last few weeks say differently? The fact that once again when shown to be out of her depth she plays the race card? Again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SirWilliam
post Jan 22 2019, 03:53 PM
Post #170


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,467
Joined: 6-March 14
From: West Berks
Member No.: 10,341



QUOTE (je suis Charlie @ Jan 22 2019, 02:19 PM) *
What, you mean the fact she said labour were in the lead and Ms Bruce was looking at a poll "issued by Downing St"? The FACT that several INDEPENDENT polls in the last few weeks say differently? The fact that once again when shown to be out of her depth she plays the race card? Again.


Don't fret dearheart, when JC gets elected and she gets a plum cabinet job you will be able to laugh yourself all the way to the foodbank.


--------------------
Si non prius succederent.......... relinquere
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Jan 22 2019, 06:29 PM
Post #171


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



From an article today,
"Ms Oakeshott said: “As this entirely confected row has dragged on, some Labour type with far too much time on their hands has worked out that Abbott was interrupted significantly more often than other panellists."

“The best explanation her supporters can come up with for this is racism, sexism or political bias on the part of the BBC.

“The truth is much simpler: she talks agonisingly slowly, opening up plenty of opportunities for intervention. And once she starts, she never stops. If we all waited politely for her to finish, nobody else would ever speak.”
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Strafin
post Jan 25 2019, 06:12 AM
Post #172


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 55



QUOTE (je suis Charlie @ Jan 22 2019, 02:19 PM) *
What, you mean the fact she said labour were in the lead and Ms Bruce was looking at a poll "issued by Downing St"? The FACT that several INDEPENDENT polls in the last few weeks say differently? The fact that once again when shown to be out of her depth she plays the race card? Again.

Clearly not then. Because that isn't what happened and you have no evidence to suggest that it did. Which kind of highlights the problem and bad is Diane Abbot up because for whatever reason, you think it's ok to lie about Her and what happened and not have to justify it. Why?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
newres
post Jan 25 2019, 06:47 AM
Post #173


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,674
Joined: 27-November 12
Member No.: 8,961



QUOTE (Strafin @ Jan 25 2019, 06:12 AM) *
Clearly not then. Because that isn't what happened and you have no evidence to suggest that it did. Which kind of highlights the problem and bad is Diane Abbot up because for whatever reason, you think it's ok to lie about Her and what happened and not have to justify it. Why?

Isn’t it obvious? She’s an uppity negro.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Jan 25 2019, 11:03 AM
Post #174


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (Strafin @ Jan 25 2019, 06:12 AM) *
Clearly not then. Because that isn't what happened and you have no evidence to suggest that it did. Which kind of highlights the problem and bad is Diane Abbot up because for whatever reason, you think it's ok to lie about Her and what happened and not have to justify it. Why?

From the independent,

"Fiona Bruce, who has taken over from Dimbleby as presenter on Question Time, does not appear to be well briefed. She got the polling for Labour vs Tory wrong."

“She (or her researcher) appears to have got their figures from a Conservative central office handout. Above all, it seems she is not afraid to appear unfair as a presenter."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Strafin
post Jan 25 2019, 12:19 PM
Post #175


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 55



QUOTE (newres @ Jan 25 2019, 06:47 AM) *
Isn’t it obvious? She’s an uppity negro.


laugh.gif

I think you're right.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  « < 7 8 9
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th March 2024 - 05:06 AM