QUOTE (Turin Machine @ May 12 2017, 10:41 PM)
Just like to attempt to point out that it's not just the UK, apparently it's 74 other countries as well and, that £200 billion wouldn't get spent on the NHS or improvements to cyber security, it would be carved up between different departments and 'special interest' groups with very little to show for it at the end of the day. It's always been the same, throughout history, the doves pursuade us that we don't need the latest and or best means of defense then, when it all goes belly up it's a mad scramble to catch up. It was only luck and chance that we survived the opening blows in ww2 and we still didn't learn the lesson.
Its not actually the technology that causes the issue, its failing to move with the change in the type of warfare. The Boar War we nearly lost because our army found it difficult to cope with guerilla type warfare as opposed to the classic battlefield stuff. Even then, we didn't understand the effect of mechanisation on battlefield war so ended up with the mess of WW1. We failed to see the threat from Germany, actually standing by and seeing it re arm that was the stupidity. Its not the kit, its our failure to anticipate what comes next - even when its staring us in the face.
We spend huge amounts on nuclear defence. Ironically, the basic kit is purchased from America, so one does have to wonder what on earth we actually get from Aldermaston and Harwell? We would have been more prudent to have asked the Americans to keep the base and weapons systems at Greenham.