Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Random Rants
|
|
Bringing back Clause 4, Whats in it for us? |
|
|
|
Aug 9 2015, 06:28 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
You don't have to go back too far and Labour were the opposition party round here. Who says they can't do it again?
There are hints (shock / horror) that a good few would like to reinstate a revised Clause 4! Would that actually help? Well, on this very forum there have been calls to take the railways back into public ownership; simply because the bogus markets don't seem capable of delivering the service we want at costs we can afford. Then take utilities, we might actually be better off with the distribution networks at least being in public hands. Rural broadband might then be more than a dream.
It all depends on the model. In my view, the mistake last time was to equate public ownership with centralisation. This time there are suggestions it should be localised. So far so good. The only hesitation I'd have is our very own local 'public management' experience. Step,forward NTC! However, if words like cooperative and agency were added to the mix - who knows, a brighter future?
Anyway, right or wrong, at least Labour are trying to come up with a real and different vision; not just a different shade of blue and a mine is bigger than yours approach to policy!
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 9 2015, 07:53 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,722
Joined: 4-September 09
Member No.: 320
|
QUOTE (motormad @ Aug 9 2015, 07:39 PM) What's clause 4? Something the labour party thought might be good for their image before they became new labour. All about common ownership.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 08:47 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
Good point! Your final question is exactly that raised in 1959. It all looks good for the Conservatives today, but just like back then I suspect the foundations are faulty. The similarity is also there for the LibDems, or Tory Lite, who seem set fair to follow the self same course. The SNP is really a protest; and sure, it's taken on the socialist mantle. Nonetheless, as we've seen so many times in the past, once the realities of power hit home and they get to see what economic devolution really looks like that majority will melt away.
Labour's success or otherwise will depend on the mood and attitude of the people. Labour traditionally only seem to win elections when it's 'we' rather than 'me'. Labour haven't been elected since Mrs T re-set the mood, so they've been badge engineering at best.
However, there is this little sign that a real vision is emerging; who knows, we might just be a real choice next time.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 10:15 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,970
Joined: 29-December 09
From: Dogging in a car park somewhere
Member No.: 592
|
QUOTE (Exhausted @ Aug 9 2015, 08:53 PM) Something the labour party thought might be good for their image before they became new labour. All about common ownership. Yeah, cos that's a helpful answer......... Such a political answer. This is why I don't vote.
--------------------
:p Grammar: the difference between knowing your poop and knowing you're poop.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 12:23 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (motormad @ Aug 10 2015, 11:15 AM) Yeah, cos that's a helpful answer......... Such a political answer. This is why I don't vote. If you live in certain areas of say Thatcham, it's not worth voting anyway! It seems counting votes properly becomes too hard if there is more than one election going on at the same time.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 12:36 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (motormad @ Aug 10 2015, 11:15 AM) Yeah, cos that's a helpful answer......... Such a political answer. This is why I don't vote. It is you right not to vote, but if you don't then that is one vote less likely that anything will change. You know how to use the Internet, a search for 'Clause 4'. Broadly speaking it is in the Labour Party's constitution and it was the clause that gave birth to public ownership: nationalisation. It was revised in the mid 90s and no-longer supported the imperative to maintain public ownership.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 03:54 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,970
Joined: 29-December 09
From: Dogging in a car park somewhere
Member No.: 592
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 10 2015, 01:36 PM) It is you right not to vote, but if you don't then that is one vote less likely that anything will change.
You know how to use the Internet, a search for 'Clause 4'. Broadly speaking it is in the Labour Party's constitution and it was the clause that gave birth to public ownership: nationalisation. It was revised in the mid 90s and no-longer supported the imperative to maintain public ownership. Generally anything you search for relating to politics ends you in a long winded trial where everyone blames everything else instead of actually getting any information. And thank you for explaining.
--------------------
:p Grammar: the difference between knowing your poop and knowing you're poop.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 06:57 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 115
Joined: 2-March 15
Member No.: 10,554
|
Isn't Clause 4 where all Labour Party members, Union Card holders and aspiring political activists at Uni start calling each other "Comrade" again and arrange meetings in smoke filled rooms where they plot how best to return Britain to the Dark Ages? ...ah yes... 70's militant Britain.... that time which very few people look back on fondly and think "The Good Old Days".. wouldn't it be nice to go there again..... Times have changed and some things will be easier to resurrect than others. They'd have to dig out the old printing plates for the Che Guevara poster for instance, but that's easily done. Working out where to go for a thoroughly miserable holiday in a proper socialist enclave with rationed grey food in grey concrete hotels is more difficult since The Wall came down though. If you hang around long enough Britain might have a few of those under a Labour Government
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 07:37 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (CrackerJack @ Aug 10 2015, 07:57 PM) Working out where to go for a thoroughly miserable holiday in a proper socialist enclave with rationed grey food in grey concrete hotels is more difficult since The Wall came down though. If you hang around long enough Britain might have a few of those under a Labour Government I'm sure you could find a number of people that would say that is their life under a Tory Britain too.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 08:12 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 115
Joined: 2-March 15
Member No.: 10,554
|
QUOTE (CrackerJack @ Aug 10 2015, 07:57 PM) Isn't Clause 4 where all Labour Party members, Union Card holders and aspiring political activists at Uni start calling each other "Comrade" again and arrange meetings in smoke filled rooms where they plot how best to return Britain to the Dark Ages? Of course in an acknowledgement of the more health conscious 2015 Britain those smoke filled rooms would instead be 'vape' filled rooms.... QUOTE (blackdog @ Aug 9 2015, 11:02 PM) It seems to me that the left wing of the Labour party are looking at the SNP with envy - they are both socialist and popular. Yes but they are a heavily subsidised socialist experiment which is maintained in a marriage of inconvenience by their 'significant other' south of the border.... If Salmond and his YES campaign had come out on top I dare say that his vision of a Socialist Scotland would become rapidly less popular once the financial fluff came into sharper focus, especially following the downturn in oil prices on which much of their socialist dream was founded and funded. Whilst the nasty Tory Toffs in England are still in charge it's going to be easy for Sturgeon to keep Scottish Saltires flying from every flagpole. Labour won't stand a chance up there again until devolution happens (which is inevitable at some stage) and once SNP have had a chance to **** it up on their own with nobody else to blame.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 08:17 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (CrackerJack @ Aug 10 2015, 09:12 PM) Yes but they are a heavily subsidised socialist experiment which is maintained in a marriage of inconvenience by their 'significant other' south of the border.... Hitherto, I have been lead to believe that Scotland is a net contributer.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 08:28 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 115
Joined: 2-March 15
Member No.: 10,554
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 10 2015, 09:17 PM) Hitherto, I have been lead to believe that Scotland is a net contributer. ...pfft... According to the Department of Fisheries (Salmond & Sturgeon Division) School of Economics. Cast them adrift and see how much life north of the border will have to change.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 08:41 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (CrackerJack @ Aug 10 2015, 09:28 PM) ...pfft... According to the Department of Fisheries (Salmond & Sturgeon Division) School of Economics. Cast them adrift and see how much life north of the border will have to change. The point is, Scotland (assuming oil revenue) has been a net contributer.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 09:27 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 10 2015, 09:17 PM) Hitherto, I have been lead to believe that Scotland is a net contributer. Has been, has been. Most of the wealth has come from the oilfields and with Brent Crude at around $50.00 a barrel you can say goodbye to that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|