Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Newbury News
Accident at Sainsbury's Roundabout, ...waiting to happen? |
|
|
|
May 17 2012, 02:45 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 129
Joined: 1-September 09
Member No.: 312
|
I was saddened to learn that the huge disruption to traffic this morning was due to an accident involving an elderly pedestrian on the Sainsbury's roundabout. It goes without saying that this is a tragedy for this gentleman's family and hopefully, forum members will refrain from 'smart alec' comments such as those which accompanied the posts on the Headley ford drowning.
But, I really wanted to question the safety of all the crossings around this roundabout. I have only recently (in an effort to save parking charges) taken advantage of Sainsbury's two hour free parking for customers and used these crossing points to go into the town centre. I was frankly, terrified - although there is a 40mph speed limit on this stretch of road and there are 'green man' signals for each of the separate crossing points, it feels quite unsafe as a pedestrian as traffic seems to be flying past and some drivers seem to accelerate wildly away from the lights. I am not elderly and my eyesight, hearing and faculties are fine but I have always been fearful, as a driver, that someone will step out in front of a car - and today, it would seem they did.
Of course I realise one could use the underpass, but, as a female, 'underpasses' are something I have always tried to avoid where there is an 'above ground' option. Maybe though, this might be a time to look at the safety of all these crossing points and consider whether to extend the railings and not allow pedestrians to cross above ground - maybe making the underpasses the only option?
--------------------
You can't shake hands with a clenched fist
|
|
|
|
|
May 17 2012, 02:58 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,012
Joined: 22-September 09
Member No.: 357
|
QUOTE (wabbit @ May 17 2012, 03:45 PM) I was saddened to learn that the huge disruption to traffic this morning was due to an accident involving an elderly pedestrian on the Sainsbury's roundabout. It goes without saying that this is a tragedy for this gentleman's family and hopefully, forum members will refrain from 'smart alec' comments such as those which accompanied the posts on the Headley ford drowning.
But, I really wanted to question the safety of all the crossings around this roundabout. I have only recently (in an effort to save parking charges) taken advantage of Sainsbury's two hour free parking for customers and used these crossing points to go into the town centre. I was frankly, terrified - although there is a 40mph speed limit on this stretch of road and there are 'green man' signals for each of the separate crossing points, it feels quite unsafe as a pedestrian as traffic seems to be flying past and some drivers seem to accelerate wildly away from the lights. I am not elderly and my eyesight, hearing and faculties are fine but I have always been fearful, as a driver, that someone will step out in front of a car - and today, it would seem they did.
Of course I realise one could use the underpass, but, as a female, 'underpasses' are something I have always tried to avoid where there is an 'above ground' option. Maybe though, this might be a time to look at the safety of all these crossing points and consider whether to extend the railings and not allow pedestrians to cross above ground - maybe making the underpasses the only option? Very sad for the lady and the family. Please keep the crossings though. Would I want my daughter/grand-daughter using the underpass at 2.00am? Wpuld you use the underpass at 2.00am? Not everybody works 9.00-5.00 and with at least three underpass muggings this year, I still think 'overground' is the safest option.
|
|
|
|
|
May 17 2012, 03:12 PM
|
Member
Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 5-February 12
Member No.: 8,554
|
QUOTE (wabbit @ May 17 2012, 03:45 PM) I was saddened to learn that the huge disruption to traffic this morning was due to an accident involving an elderly pedestrian on the Sainsbury's roundabout. It goes without saying that this is a tragedy for this gentleman's family and hopefully, forum members will refrain from 'smart alec' comments such as those which accompanied the posts on the Headley ford drowning.
But, I really wanted to question the safety of all the crossings around this roundabout. I have only recently (in an effort to save parking charges) taken advantage of Sainsbury's two hour free parking for customers and used these crossing points to go into the town centre. I was frankly, terrified - although there is a 40mph speed limit on this stretch of road and there are 'green man' signals for each of the separate crossing points, it feels quite unsafe as a pedestrian as traffic seems to be flying past and some drivers seem to accelerate wildly away from the lights. I am not elderly and my eyesight, hearing and faculties are fine but I have always been fearful, as a driver, that someone will step out in front of a car - and today, it would seem they did.
Of course I realise one could use the underpass, but, as a female, 'underpasses' are something I have always tried to avoid where there is an 'above ground' option. Maybe though, this might be a time to look at the safety of all these crossing points and consider whether to extend the railings and not allow pedestrians to cross above ground - maybe making the underpasses the only option?
|
|
|
|
|
May 17 2012, 03:24 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 20-February 12
From: Thatcham
Member No.: 8,617
|
I hope the poor man makes a full recovery in Hospital and thoughts are with his family.
However, although I know cars come speeding round the corners, and many go faster than they should do, especially between the different sets of lights, the pedestrians also cause a lot of problems.
I haven't been driving for very long, however the amount of times I have seen a pedestrian press the button and then cross without waiting for the green man because they thought it was safe to do so, and pedestrians who decide to actually cross the dual carriageway, climb over the railings in the middle and then cross on the other side is ridiculous!
I think everyone needs to have a lot more awareness of their surroundings and remember that cars will do a lot of damage to you if it hits you at speed, and they can't always be blamed if someone was to step right out in front of them.
--------------------
TJHaines
|
|
|
|
|
May 17 2012, 03:36 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 129
Joined: 1-September 09
Member No.: 312
|
QUOTE (Roger T @ May 17 2012, 03:17 PM) A shame. Although, I walk across here daily, normally I walk to Sainsburys from town. I also make the return journey at approximately the same time. Never have a problem, myself. I do however have a tendency to walk into lamp posts. I see some people who will still go to cross the road, just as the red illuminated man begins to show.. late for a business meeting, I assume. Why take the risk. As this is the Newbury Weekly News forum, I'm always surprised when people post on the 'Newbury News' section of the forum without reading the news first! Isn't that how the furore over Xjay (or whatever incarnation he was at that time) occured when he didn't bother to even read a story first. Maybe a little hasty and judgemental Roger T to assume this chap was 'late for a business meeting' - he is described as an 'elderly man' - which, let's be honest, could describe most of the members of this forum!! As there is such an emphasis these days on health & safety (and even the proximity of our local police station!), I would have hoped there would have been regular risk assessments carried out on these crossings?
--------------------
You can't shake hands with a clenched fist
|
|
|
|
|
May 17 2012, 03:43 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 673
Joined: 18-April 12
Member No.: 8,697
|
QUOTE (wabbit @ May 17 2012, 04:36 PM) As this is the Newbury Weekly News forum, I'm always surprised when people post on the 'Newbury News' section of the forum without reading the news first! Isn't that how the furore over Xjay (or whatever incarnation he was at that time) occured when he didn't bother to even read a story first.
Maybe a little hasty and judgemental Roger T to assume this chap was 'late for a business meeting' - he is described as an 'elderly man' - which, let's be honest, could describe most of the members of this forum!!
As there is such an emphasis these days on health & safety (and even the proximity of our local police station!), I would have hoped there would have been regular risk assessments carried out on these crossings? am not sure Rodger meant the elderly man in question, just as an example he has seen people jumping the red light.
|
|
|
|
|
May 17 2012, 03:56 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60
|
QUOTE (Newbelly @ May 17 2012, 04:31 PM) Sorry to hear about the accident.
I have previously thought whether the crossing should be moved a little towards the rail station to take it a bit away from the junction. I don't think that the lights for the pedestrians are very well sync'd. You cross from the town side to the middle on green and just as you get to the 2nd crossing it turns red. You are then tempted to flee across rather than wait.
|
|
|
|
|
May 17 2012, 03:59 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 389
Joined: 23-March 12
Member No.: 8,669
|
QUOTE (TallDarkAndHandsome @ May 17 2012, 04:56 PM) I don't think that the lights for the pedestrians are very well sync'd. You cross from the town side to the middle on green and just as you get to the 2nd crossing it turns red. You are then tempted to flee across rather than wait. Yes, I have seen people rush as a result, although I do not know if this was a factor in recent events.
|
|
|
|
|
May 17 2012, 04:00 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 639
Joined: 3-May 12
Member No.: 8,715
|
QUOTE (wabbit @ May 17 2012, 04:36 PM) As there is such an emphasis these days on health & safety (and even the proximity of our local police station!), I would have hoped there would have been regular risk assessments carried out on these crossings? You are joking right? The health and safety culture is what I think is causing great damage to the UK economy... of course I am the most qualified person for the job (I taught lower level English and IT so well qualified for the financial side of things... (sarcasm)) What would you like, perhaps Hi-visibility jackets, method statements and a risk assesment form all filled out before you can use a crossing? Crossings are clear to me and have been since childhood... light is red, you wait, light is green, you go. Of course we may bend these rules traffic flow depending but ultimately if I walk out and get hit, and the pedestrian light is red, it's only myself to blame..
|
|
|
|
|
May 17 2012, 04:05 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ May 17 2012, 04:58 PM) Without knowing the circumstances of the accident it is impossible to comment on the satefy of the pedestrian crossings. I uses them many times & never have felt in any danger. The woman was crossing and she was hit by a car. The Police detained the car and the driver. The lady had head injuries.
|
|
|
|
|
May 17 2012, 04:10 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (GMR @ May 17 2012, 05:05 PM) The woman was crossing and she was hit by a car. The Police detained the car and the driver. The lady had head injuries. No **** sherlock. I'd kind of figured that out already. NWN has it as a male pedestrian btw.
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|