Link:

Gob Smacking stuff.

Ever thought she might just be toying with you?

Steady, no-one's said that. After reading the story which quite clearly makes it clear that nobody else was killed or injured, one can form the opinion that our roads are possibly a bit safer not having him around. Had others been involved I'm sure one's view about the event might change. (possibly not about him though)

No it wouldn't. It would still be along the lines of "Shame, but one less twit on the road"

You are correct.

I have no problem with them listening to their own programs. (providing all the housework etc, has been done).

They can sometimes get a pretty raw deal, bless 'em, so if they want to sit around the wireless listening to patronising guff then I say good luck to them. It'll save their pretty little heads from having to think about anything of real importance. (like parallel parking, map reading, the off-side rule, why on earth Chelsea bought Torres, and Skyrim)

Or just one with three different identities.

Mange tout...

Welease Woderick?

Horsemeat isn't really the problem, Bare-faced corporate greed and lying is.

Extra! Extra! Read all about it:

Anonymous person stops posting on tiny provincial forum!

Pope say " no cause for alarm"
Pound falls.
French surrender.
Cameron to give statement to House.
Shops and schools close early out of respect.
Huhne Denial.
Stoke Poges council demands inquiry.
Traces of bull**** found in resignation letter.
Incoming head of Bank of England says "who"?
Sun continues to rise in the east and set in the west.



On other pages:

How to shake your hair and flounce out of room properly.
What to do if your child has a hissey-fit.

I'd go further than that. I bet Blake cannot or will not post any link to any 'recent' TV programme which looked at "what people eat at Christmas". (Channel? Date? Time? Presenter?) In fact I question his motives in posting the original comments.

Um, are you saying that members of this forum should be guided in their deliberations by something you say you heard?
Yeah, 'bout right.

No, they stand on each others shoulders wearing a large trench coat and a big hat, and wait at the bottom.



Don't shoot the messenger. They are also absent from the Scilly Isles, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands and all the Scottish islands except Skye and Harris.

Indeedy. Because of the currents in the Solent little can swim across and survive. There are no Grey Squirrels there either. (They never made it across). Hence a large population of Red ones. (unless the Foxes get them of course)

No-one said he was "lovely, cuddly," I'm just curious as to why the Hunt imported him to somewhere that he wasn't. If the Fox is a pest, and that's the reason for hunting him, then why breed cubs and release them to do more damage and harm?

Simple question.

No, I haven't seen one either, but I do know of one that got a visit from Brer Fox, and apparently it was a real nasty mess after he'd been through it.

Cousin of mine, smallholding (inc. Rabbits and Chickens) near Freshwater, Isle of Wight. Cost him a fortune.

Of course, the Fox is not indigenous to the Island, so fox cubs were imported there some years ago to give the Medina based hunt something to do. If the Hunt were truly concerned about damage to peoples property, pets and livelihoods, they wouldn't have bred the fox cubs in the first place would they? But once that red mist of blood-lust covers the eyes....
So, please, no more about "we only do it to keep Foxes down" or "Foxes are a pest which need to be controlled". The actions of the hunting brigade (importing Foxes where there are none) gives the lie to those statements doesn't it?

Not sure if this helps or hinders, but since it's one of my posts being quoted, I'll expand on it.

I have p.m'd 'Squelchy' in the recent past with a few links that I thought he / she might find useful. I mentioned 'Newbelly' in one of them. Sadly, I have deleted the reply, but it went something along the lines of = Squelchy seems to spend all day working with idiots, and didn't see why he / she had to put up with them in his / her spare time. I took that to mean that 'Newbelly' had probably been put 'on ignore' and he / she was therefore no longer able to read posts from 'Newbelly'. Hence my observation that Newbelly may be wasting their time trying to chat to them.

That was all, in no way was I saying that anyone here was anybody else. nor should my post be taken to suggest any such thing.

Wasting your time. I think he / she's got you on 'ignore'

We'll take that as a 'can't' then. Here chicky chicky chicky....

Click any link below:

No

There

Bloody

Isn't

Really?

Backing away from it all now are you? They wouldn't have been here if you hadn't started the thread in the first place.

He, or she, was, quite correctly, pointing out that what you said was 'irony' wasn't. Why do you get so spiteful when those better educated than you help you by showing you where you've gone wrong? Try not to feel so threatened.

No, no, no, what you actually said was:


You did not qualify it at all. Don't try to weasel out of it. There are those on this thread who will know that you've got economic migrants, Immigrants and probably Asylum-Seekers all confused into one.

You probably won't like this, but here is the Tier system that prospective Immigrants must satisfy: Not quite as easy as the Tabloids make out