QUOTE (GMR @ Jul 11 2009, 02:28 PM)
I agree totally; the problem is we use the Geneva convention when we fight, they fight as they see fit. To fight fire we need fire. A civilized society cannot use civility to fight animals.
I'm not sure, did the gun bring IRA to the table? But I understand the subtext your statement, but to fight as an animal means one becomes one, so what is the gain?
QUOTE (GMR @ Jul 11 2009, 02:28 PM)
I agree and the same could be said about Iraq; however, it was a case of needs must at the time (I am not saying I agree with that approach, but understand it), today we have to look at things differently. Remember; at one time America was our enemy and we fitted their enemies out with our weapons, now they are our partners. We have to look at each case on its merit.
The problem with things like Irag, is the reason we went there wasn't the one portrayed and it leaves us morally weaker for it.