Printable Version of Topic

Posted by: Blake Nov 27 2014, 02:12 PM

Has anyone else noticed (or perhaps not) the proliferation of idiots riding bicycles locally without lights on after dark?

They seem to be all over the place, oblivious to the risks.

And where are the old bill to deal with them...absent as far as I can see.

Posted by: user23 Nov 27 2014, 10:10 PM

No. I haven't seen them.

Posted by: x2lls Nov 28 2014, 12:21 AM

Did you by any chance have an altercation with a cyclist?
Perhaps you can provide an account of the reasoning behind your post.
The old bill were probably dealing with proper criminals.

Posted by: newres Nov 28 2014, 07:32 AM

I've seen them, but often the fags they are smoking make them visible.

Posted by: Biker1 Nov 28 2014, 08:10 PM

Yes

They don't care.

Posted by: Biker1 Nov 28 2014, 08:15 PM

Who hasn't?

He probably has seen the many cyclists riding about at night in dark clothes with no lights and got annoyed about it as it is dangerous and thought he would bring it to others attention to see if they agreed with him?

Yeah right!!

Posted by: x2lls Nov 29 2014, 02:46 AM

Posted by: newres Nov 29 2014, 07:48 AM

As a cyclist I have had several altercations with badly driven cars. One is very vulnerable on a bike on the road. Without doubt there are irresponsible cyclists, but mostly they only put themselves at risk and present very little risk to anybody else.

The attitude of Biker1 illustrates exactly why the roads are unsafe for cyclists.

Posted by: On the edge Nov 29 2014, 09:26 AM

What's also fascinating was the comment about the old Bill. They never seem to apprehend the offenders 'we' want dealt with! You can't blame them I suppose, it's no win for them. Complain about drivers parking on pavements, a couple I know won't use the cycle way in Kiln Road for that very reason. Of course, if the enforcers did their job and book the drivers, they get called green meanies!

Posted by: Exhausted Nov 29 2014, 11:47 AM

Can't say that I have seen cars on the footpath/cycle way in Kiln Road. I think that cyclists who cycle on the road when there is a cycle path should be prosecuted like drivers who park on the cycle way. Tit for tat really.

Posted by: Andy Capp Nov 29 2014, 12:43 PM

Thank the Lord you have no power.

Posted by: JeffG Nov 29 2014, 02:58 PM

I think he has a point. Where a cycle way is provided, its use should be mandatory.

Posted by: On the edge Nov 29 2014, 03:35 PM

Little wonder drivers can't see riders at night then, it my friends have a point! I must say, having just come back that way, the parked cars do seem to act as a chicane at the bottom of the hill and on the cycle path side, I counted five.

Posted by: Andy Capp Nov 30 2014, 10:31 AM

Perhaps if there was a cycle lane for every inch of road, but cycle lanes are often a hindrance and sometimes create their own dangers and what do you do about when a cyclist wants to turn right? It is a preposterous idea. Just make roads wider.

Posted by: JeffG Nov 30 2014, 11:55 AM

The proper solution would be to have totally separate routes for cyclists away from vehicular traffic, like they have in the Netherlands. Perhaps if they redesigned Newbury from scratch the planners could incorporate this. Meanwhile we're stuck with what we have.

It does help if you can see them, though.

Posted by: Andy Capp Nov 30 2014, 11:59 AM

I completely agree, but you will then have complaints of cyclists and pedestrians clashing.

Posted by: Exhausted Nov 30 2014, 12:35 PM

I think that the cars which you suggest are parked there and causing a chicane are actually parked in a designated parking area and the van that was up on the kerb was off the road but not on the cycle lane or footpath, but I take your point. I also drove along the town end of the Andover Road and noticed a car parked by the side of the road which is over the cycle way, It is not protected by a kerb, just a green stripe on the road. What are the rules about that. I can't be bothered to google it.

Posted by: Biker1 Nov 30 2014, 06:03 PM

Why do you say that? My "attitude" does not include putting cyclists in danger, many do that for themselves.
I have every respect for cyclists who obey the law and have consideration for other highway users including pedestrians.
(When I say "highway" that includes footpaths, bridleways and towpaths.)
Saw an unlit bike just in time tonight on the road across Hungerford Common.
He was close to coming a cropper with me as I didn't see him until he was 3 or 4 seconds away!
When you say " they only put themselves at risk and present very little risk to anybody else" how do you think I would have felt, and legally, who would have got the blame if I had hit him?
And why put himself at more risk than he needs to?

Posted by: MontyPython Nov 30 2014, 07:46 PM

Or you may have put yourself and others in danger trying to swerve and avoid him!

Posted by: Man in orange hat Dec 1 2014, 07:51 AM

What if it had been an unlit pedestrian? If you were only two or three seconds away, you were going too fast for the conditions.

Posted by: Biker1 Dec 1 2014, 08:15 AM

Pedestrians should take the same precautions. I wouldn't walk along an unlit country road in black clothing with no light.

I knew someone would say that.
The conditions were..............dark!!
What speed should one do on an unlit country road? I was doing approximately 30.
I am amazed that people will defend and obvious unsafe and illegal act!!
(Please bear in mind that there are some drivers out there who cannot see to read a blatant road sign telling them not cross a bridge even in broad daylight!! )

Posted by: part time Dec 2 2014, 08:57 AM

I ride a bike to work most days. In regard to cycle paths I can confirm that the one along Shaw Crescent is impassible at some times due to pavement parking so far over you are forced into the bushes that border the field. My route also takes me along the Turnpike Road. The junctions for Avon Way and Gaywood Drive while using the cyclepath are incredibly badly implemented from a cyclists point of view. The drop kerbs are way down the roads you are crossing with poor visibility of oncoming traffic using the mini roundabouts. I don't blame cyclists one bit for avoiding them and using the road instead.

Posted by: newres Dec 2 2014, 04:49 PM

The thing is though that your posts betray a resentment towards cyclists and a laissez-faire attitude towards your responsibility as a car user towards their safety.

Posted by: The Hatter Dec 2 2014, 05:07 PM

Some car drivers think they can do just what they want just because they pay a few pounds road tax. My GF lives off Pear Tree Lane and we walk to and from town. Some times it is pretty hard to keep on the pavement because of parked cars and it's pretty bad on the estate roads and Kiln Hill. They even park on the grass verge digging it up and making a mess. People parking on pavements are a bigger danger at night than a few bikes without lights.

Posted by: Biker1 Dec 2 2014, 06:37 PM

Incorrect.
I have a resentment towards inconsiderate, law breaking cyclists.

Incorrect.
I would NEVER deliberately put a cyclist, law breaker or not, in danger through my driving / riding.

Posted by: HJD Dec 2 2014, 06:50 PM

I'm sure a lot of these car owners would welcome your advice on where else you think they can legally park !!

Posted by: On the edge Dec 2 2014, 07:19 PM

Oh dear, that debate again!

I must admit, I'm a bit big these days but none too steady on my feet....so if my trolley gets a bit to close to these obstructions, can I help it? See what I mean Hatter old son, specially when it's dark!

Posted by: x2lls Dec 2 2014, 09:35 PM

LIKE!!

Posted by: Turin Machine Dec 2 2014, 11:00 PM

Oh dear, yet another thinly veiled and clumsy threat of criminal damage, wonder if you would be happy repeating that whilst under caution?

Posted by: On the edge Dec 3 2014, 07:05 AM

What are you going to do if I said yes all I'm doing is pointing out that accidents happen what's more, personally I don't take care when passing obstructions in the pavement be they cars or intruding shrubs. The only muppets I see in this debate are those that think driving a car gives then an absolute right to do just what they want and the right to criticise anyone else who gets in their way. Irresponsible parking, legal or not, is just as offensive as using a bike improperly.

Posted by: x2lls Dec 3 2014, 03:04 PM

Well said,.

Posted by: motormad Dec 3 2014, 03:45 PM

I would.

Posted by: Biker1 Dec 3 2014, 04:06 PM

Who are they then??


I'd say they were a menace rather than a danger. And certainly not as dangerous as riding a bike at night without lights which not, as you say, a few do, but many do.

Posted by: Andy Capp Dec 3 2014, 05:37 PM

Riding on the path, riding without lights, parking on the path blocking pedestrians and cyclist's way; you're all Muppets!

Posted by: newres Dec 3 2014, 06:11 PM

Seriously? You would put knock cyclist down because they had no lights.

Posted by: MontyPython Dec 3 2014, 06:13 PM

Maybe the owner of the car you damage will be similarly careless with his flailing arms which may happen to connect with your face. I don't excpect many would see it more than poetic justice given your attitude.

Posted by: Andy Capp Dec 3 2014, 07:46 PM

If one puts something where it shouldn't be (a car on a path, obstructing or partially obstructing the may), then I think they can expect an increased risk of damage, deliberate, or otherwise. Of course, two wrongs don't make a right, and no-one is entitled to purposely damage a car for no other reason than 'revenge'.

Posted by: MontyPython Dec 3 2014, 10:03 PM

Exactly 3 wrongs don't make a right - but when OTE puts his trolley where it shouldn't be namely Mr Thug's car he can no doubt expect an increased risk of damage!

Posted by: On the edge Dec 3 2014, 10:39 PM

Oooh don't damage my precious car, the substitution for my manhood!! Yes, I've confronted some anti social packers. Get some interesting comments. As I told one bloke if the firm he was visiting thought him important or useful, they'd have a car parking space reserved for him. And as for someone's fist, yeah go ahead, I could do with the compo.

Posted by: part time Dec 4 2014, 07:32 AM

I think this whole thing can be easily summed up. If you drive a car, cyclists are *****. If you ride a bike, motorists are *****.
If you regulalry indulge in both activities, everyone is a ****

Posted by: The Hatter Dec 5 2014, 07:52 AM

I think it's just that some people are just plain selfish. Most people walk, ride bikes and drive cars. We do sometimes see cars without lights and pedestrians don't have them, if a driver can't see them in our well lit streets and with headlights, then dare I say they have an eyesight problem and shouldn't be driving anyway.

Posted by: Biker1 Dec 5 2014, 08:50 AM

And that's OK is it?

I don't understand what you are referring to here.
Do you mean cars without lights, or pedestrians without lights on lit streets, or bicycles without lights on an unlit country road?
If you mean the latter the, once gain, I cannot believe that someone is defending that!
Lights for bicycles are a few quid in Halfords, what's the excuse??
Again, I would suggest that drivers who cannot see a blatant road sign shouldn't be driving anyway, but they have been defended to the hilt on here.

Posted by: Turin Machine Dec 5 2014, 10:18 AM

It's against the law, should be reason enough.

Posted by: bonnie Dec 5 2014, 10:52 AM

Posted by: bonnie Dec 5 2014, 10:56 AM

Sorry big boo boo.
Meant to add,while they are getting lights for their bicycles,they might have a quick look to see if you can still buy bells

Posted by: motormad Dec 5 2014, 11:30 AM

well I'd hardly be able to see them would i......

Posted by: The Hatter Dec 5 2014, 01:02 PM

That's the point! Riding without lights is illegal, so are many things car drivers do; almost every time they take a car on the road. OK, no lights might seem dangerous, but so is speeding etc. no lights is pretty minor in the grand scheme of things. Seriously, if you can't see a bike in a well lit street at night, there really is something seriously wrong with your eyesight. What happens if it's a deer, a dog or a pedestrian? Complain by all means, but let's keep a sense of proportion.

Posted by: Nothing Much Dec 5 2014, 03:17 PM

The last time I had an altercation with a deer was in daylight.
I barely saw it, then it was gone.. He was following a doe at a fast pace.
And was gone in a flash...I wish dating was that easy.
ce

Posted by: On the edge Dec 5 2014, 03:53 PM

Come on CE! There seems to be an ever increasing number of visually challenged drivers found here. They can't see road prohibition signs, lane markings, car park tariff signs, speed limits, indicator stalks etc etc. Some have even taking to displaying white sticks; often personalised with a pennant. I blame Europe for the softly softly enforcement approach - what we need is some good old US traffic policing

Posted by: JeffG Dec 5 2014, 04:07 PM

I remember a work colleague was once pulled over for speeding with the words "OK, leadfoot, where's the fire?".

Posted by: newres Dec 5 2014, 06:14 PM

Obviously you and others can see them otherwise there would be no thread.

I find some of the views from the usual suspects on this thread quite astonishing.

Posted by: MontyPython Dec 5 2014, 06:42 PM

I can see bikes being ridden without lights on streets lit or unlit whilst walking and comment that it would be dangerous as they might not be seen by a car!

Posted by: motormad Dec 8 2014, 11:20 AM

I find your inability to notice sarcasm quite astonishing.

Posted by: Gazzadp Dec 15 2014, 04:34 PM

I have noticed a growing number of cyclists riding bikes whilst wearing/listening to headphones, they seem totally oblivious to the fact that they lose all spacious awareness, when doing so. So much so that they are not just a danger to themselves but others around them. BTW: I am not a car driver, so I am not just knocking other road users.

Posted by: On the edge Dec 15 2014, 05:30 PM

I think that's true of pedestrians as well, not much of a problem walking about on the pavement, but once they lurch off the curb, it's another matter. Oh well. Modern manners I suppose. To think, when I was young, even eating on the street was considered impolite.

Posted by: Biker1 Dec 15 2014, 10:36 PM

I bet you don't put your feet on the seats on the trains either. if you don't you're in a minority it would seem.

Posted by: x2lls Dec 15 2014, 10:38 PM

It ain't just cyclists, the boom boom boys are equally guilty.

Posted by: Turin Machine Dec 15 2014, 10:49 PM

And glaze eyed, vacant young women who, with their eyed glued to their phone screens wander about into the traffic like headlamp dazed young rabbits oblivious to their onrushing annihilation.

Posted by: x2lls Dec 15 2014, 11:33 PM

I wonder how many smartphone users have apolgised to a lamp post?

Posted by: part time Dec 16 2014, 07:31 AM

I ride with headphones in all the time.
Maybe I shouldn't?
But i'd never base a decision about what I was doing during my journey on what I could hear without looking round or whatever anyway. You can hear important things like sirens, car horns and angry ranting pedestrians anyway.

Posted by: Biker1 Dec 16 2014, 09:16 AM

That's right.

Posted by: part time Dec 16 2014, 10:19 AM

I'll carry on for now.....

Posted by: Biker1 Dec 17 2014, 07:44 AM

Why do you need to do that?
Why do you need music (or whatever it is you listen to) in your ears as you go about your daily business?
Highly distracting surely?

Posted by: motormad Dec 17 2014, 09:40 AM

I always used to ride with headphones on my motorcycle.
It wasn't distracting.
I could still hear traffic around me. Plus as they were sound reducing ones they also saved me having to wear earbuds to protect my hearing.

Posted by: part time Dec 17 2014, 12:21 PM

Why do I need to? I don't need to. I like to. Much like car drivers like to have the radio on while they go about their daily business in their cars.
Distracting? I don't believe so.

Posted by: JeffG Dec 17 2014, 02:42 PM

Some car drivers. I prefer peace and quiet myself.

Posted by: Andy Capp Dec 17 2014, 02:45 PM

In car OK, but I have to say, I don't have the guts to ride with music going on. I don't even like to walk with earphones.

Posted by: spartacus Dec 17 2014, 05:13 PM

Presumably that's to ensure you don't embarrass yourself by breaking into some crazy dance moves or wind up the air guitar on your walk to work.....

Posted by: Andy Capp Dec 17 2014, 05:27 PM

...or walking to the rhythm of the song!

Posted by: MontyPython Dec 18 2014, 07:58 PM

They don't really go with the flat cap and fag do they?