Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Random Rants
|
|
Crime Tsunami? |
|
|
Guest_noobree_*
|
Jul 17 2009, 01:06 PM
|
Guests
|
QUOTE (anon123 @ Jul 16 2009, 08:56 PM) General concensus is that local police are useless, lazy and spend most of their time dealing with pointless things (just opinion formed from posters comments). Thats like me coming to your office with no idea what it is you do and accusing you of being rubbish at your job. But, they deal with the things that are reported, what's pointless to one is not so pointless to the person if effects!! That's only a general consensus amongst idiots, I'd suggest! I certainly don't feel that way. You do an incredibly difficult, and often dangerous, job and I'd be very surprised if most people - albeit the silent majority - are right behind you. Anonymous comments on whinge boards like this don't count, except yours and mine obviously. In my experience those who are first to complain are those who do the least to help. I appreciate that I've just complained, but I'm complaining about complainers so I think that's OK! My original post was intended to ask whether we really have a problem and, in particular, whether crime levels in Newbury are really getting significantly worse.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 01:25 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 318
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 26
|
QUOTE (noobree @ Jul 17 2009, 02:06 PM) My original post was intended to ask whether we really have a problem and, in particular, whether crime levels in Newbury are really getting significantly worse. I come originally from SE London....trust me, this is heaven compaired to some areas there. The thing about crime in modern times, I believe, is that is is much more readily available to find out about via the media, internet etc. Therefore we just hear, read and can find out about it much easy and so get the illusion that is is getting much worse. Which it probably is but nowhere near to the degree we imagine
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 17 2009, 07:00 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33
|
QUOTE The overall workings of the police are decided way higher up than the PC on the street, but he/she is always the one that gets the grief. Give them a break and direct your anger and frustration to the people that do have the power to change things. And how do we do that? Are you going to give us the names of the police who are “higher up” the food chain and responsible? I doubt it. I’ve worked in also sorts of jobs; management, dealing directly with the public and supermarkets and when members of the public get annoyed with stupid rules/ systems/ policies of a certain company or organisation they always take it on the front line troops as they are easily accessible. A few years ago people had problems with the trains and the rising prices and the public took out their anger and frustrations at the porters who worked there. In America the police got fed up with being abused by the public for incompetence from higher up the food chain and went on strike; it worked (at least for awhile). The police can’t go on strike in this country, however, if you made a gesture of sympathy and support by resigning en masse – which will cause mass unrest and anarchy - the lunatics up the top might actually take notice and do something. The problem with that idea is that you’d be too busy protecting your own interests therefore such gestures will never happen. We have seen in the past that people’s uprising in this country has and can work; the poll tax for instance. People protested, Thatcher went along with the pole tax. Until somebody makes such a gesture then the front line troops will always suffer for the bureaucracy and stupidity of the morons from above.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 18 2009, 01:00 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 16-July 09
Member No.: 198
|
GMR I don't need to give you those names it's all widely available in the public domain.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 18 2009, 01:54 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33
|
QUOTE (anon123 @ Jul 18 2009, 02:00 PM) GMR I don't need to give you those names it's all widely available in the public domain. Yes they are but they are not easily approachable. The only options normal citizens have is either write - which will be ignored - or act in unison; ie go for the easier targets. You also know their names and whereabouts; have you and your colleagues shown your disgust at the way you’ve been treated because of THEIR policies/ rules and took your frustrations out at them? If not why not? Or are you happy with the status quo? People prefer easy options and that will always be the front-line troops. People wrote to Thatcher and their local MP’s in their thousand over the pole tax; nothing. People went out in the streets and protested; including attacking the police and, as I said before, Thatcher and the pole tax went. If you want the abuse to stop either the government changes its policies or either you act or the citizens of this country; and that usually means taking it out on you and your colleagues. I am not saying I agree with that approach, but that is the only options available to the ordinary citizens of this country.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 18 2009, 06:18 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33
|
QUOTE When the police protested about their reneged pay deal, I think that was only fair because the Government had betrayed them (and themselves) - The amount was not even peanuts compared to the amount the financial institutions received recently. The issue I see is that the senior ranks are thinking more about their pension than about delivering to their rank and file. It is not only the police the government betrayed. They came into power saying they will get tough on crime and the causes of crime and since they’ve been in power crime has gone up. QUOTE I think it is important for the Police 'Service' to remain disciplined and to see them rioting would be counter productive. The wage protests yielded nothing either. This is all under the assumption that the rank and file are 'disgusted' of course. Nobody is suggesting that they riot, just stand up and be counted because they are unhappy with the decisions from above; including too much paper work and red tape. QUOTE I don't think the Poll Tax was defeated by riots - It was just a bad piece of legislation that wasn't workable. Civil disobedience in the form of non payments, rather than riots, did more harm to the policy I feel. They weren’t defeated by “riots” alone; large groups of people protesting up and down the country and of course what you said; “non payment” of the poll tax contributed to it being ditched. QUOTE As for a crime tsunami in Newbury - I don't see it, but that will be poor consolation to people that do suffer from being a victim of crime. I know a number of people that have moved to this area, in part, because of the relative low crime rate, in particular low level crime. I wouldn’t use the word “tsunami” but I have seen crime go up in Newbury and I’ve also seen fewer and fewer people ringing the police to report the crime; how do I know this. One it has been reported nationally. But also the police and people I’ve spoken to.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 18 2009, 10:04 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20
|
QUOTE (GMR @ Jul 18 2009, 07:18 PM) It is not only the police the government betrayed. They came into power saying they will get tough on crime and the causes of crime and since they’ve been in power crime has gone up. Not according to the BCS "HOW HAVE LEVELS OF CRIME CHANGED OVER THE LONGER TERM? Long-term trends show that BCS crime rose steadily from 1981 through to the early 1990s, peaking in 1995. Crime then fell, making 1995 a significant turning point. The fall was substantial until 2004/05, when BCS crime levels stabilised until the further decline this year. BCS crime is now at the lowest ever level since the first results in 1981. Trends in BCS violence, vehicle related theft and burglary broadly reflect the trend in all BCS crime." Source: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs08/hosb0708summ.pdfWhether this reflects crime in Newbury, I don't know. QUOTE (GMR @ Jul 18 2009, 07:18 PM) Nobody is suggesting that they riot, just stand up and be counted because they are unhappy with the decisions from above; including too much paper work and red tape. All services complain of this and often the reason for the red tape is born out of things that have happened in the past that necessitate it. The paper work can be mitigated by updating the methods by which they record crime. Red tape can be necessary because clever lawyers can otherwise engineer acquittals. Indeed, in the past, people have complained about victimisation, so the red tape is designed to mitigate that. QUOTE (GMR @ Jul 18 2009, 07:18 PM) They weren’t defeated by “riots” alone; large groups of people protesting up and down the country and of course what you said; “non payment” of the poll tax contributed to it being ditched. Agreed, but I suspect you might overestimate how much power the rank and file have to make many protestations. A bit like in the army, members don't like to be seen winging. Very much like the old saying, 'If you can't take a joke, then you shouldn't have signed on'. This might be a good reason to watch the Police Conference this year, if it hasn't already happened. It would be interesting to see what it is they feel they lack that would be practical to provide. QUOTE (GMR @ Jul 18 2009, 07:18 PM) I wouldn’t use the word “tsunami” but I have seen crime go up in Newbury and I’ve also seen fewer and fewer people ringing the police to report the crime; how do I know this. One it has been reported nationally. But also the police and people I’ve spoken to. I have seen news reports that suggest that people not reporting certain types of crime as a theory, but I'm not sure it is fact that fewer people report it every year. I do know though that people are reluctant to report crime for a number of reasons. One thing I don't like is that when one phones the police, you get put through to a call centre not in Newbury. What is quite unnerving is how few police there can be in Newbury some times, but on another note, perhaps the paucity of Police in Newbury is a tribute to how peaceful it is most of the time, so when something does happen, it comes as a shock.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 18 2009, 10:17 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20
|
QUOTE (GMR @ Jul 18 2009, 11:08 PM) Iommi, you make some good points which could go either way. I'm not sure I like the sound of that! Let's just assume I'm right and we are a low crime area, that is no reason of course to pack our bags and go home. We should remain vigilant and also realise, whilst crime generally might be low, there will be people in the same area that are suffering immeasurably.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 18 2009, 10:23 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33
|
QUOTE (Iommi @ Jul 18 2009, 11:17 PM) I'm not sure I like the sound of that! Let's just assume I'm right and we are a low crime area, that is no reason of course to pack our bags and go home. We should remain vigilant and also realise, whilst crime generally might be low, there will be people in the same area that are suffering immeasurably. I can't argue with that. I am sure there are many parts of Newbury that is ok; I can only speak personally and going by talking to other people.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 04:59 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,251
Joined: 15-May 09
Member No.: 61
|
QUOTE (GMR @ Jul 18 2009, 11:08 PM) Concerning call centres; I agree. At one time calls used to go straight through to Newbury, but not any more. There hasn't been a control room in Newbury since about 1992, when it was closed and all calls (except direct dial to extensions) when to the switchboards and 999 to the Wantage Control Room. The question has to be asked, why do people report crimes? Is it because they want the offender caught, prosecuted and sentenced? Not really. it's because without that little reference number, they cannot report it to their insurance company and make a claim. A classic example of this was someone who reported the theft of their wedding ring. The thieves ignored all the other jewellery, cash and valuables and took just the ring. A bit of questioning revealed they hadn't had it stolen at all, but had lost it at home. They then wanted it reported as lost, given a reference so they could make a claim. This was refused as it was lost at home and there was no chance of anyone else finding it and handing it in. The police are not a reporting service for insurance companies. One of biggest problems is that the police are the only 24/7/365 contact for all other public services. House been burgled? Call the police stolen car? Call the police lost my cat? Call the police noisy party you weren't invited to ? Call the police pothole in road. call police and demand it's filled in car parked on road with VEL that expired yesterday? Dial 999 and ask for police etc etc etc. Police officers get fed up with being used as social workers for all of society's ills instead of being able to get on with catching criminals. Also, everyone wants a police force who operate a 'zero tolerance' policy on crime. Until it impacts them of course. In this country (despite what some think) we have 'policing by consent' and as population we can withdraw that consent. We don't because even anarchists don't want to live in anarchy as there is always an anarchist bigger than you.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 09:41 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20
|
QUOTE (Darren @ Jul 19 2009, 05:59 AM) One of biggest problems is that the police are the only 24/7/365 contact for all other public services. 999 is the number for all the emergency services, Ambulance, Fire Rescue, Police, etc... Your point Darren, is a worthy one, albeit irrelevant in this discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 10:09 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33
|
QUOTE (Iommi @ Jul 19 2009, 10:41 AM) 999 is the number for the emergency services, Ambulance, Fire Rescue, Police, etc... Your point Darren, is a worthy one, albeit irrelevant in this discussion. That made me laugh
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2009, 11:26 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20
|
QUOTE (Darren @ Jul 19 2009, 12:03 PM) I said public service, not emergency services. It might be that people misuse 999, but provided it is not malicious I don't see the problem as such, but what it does suggest, is there is a need for a general citizens help line that people could be directed to. People will ask for the police because they seem the logical choice of the ones available. Behind the examples of non emergency examples you cite, could lie a crime. I feel, however, the police should always be involved where the public's welfare or property is at risk. House been burgled? Call the police (a legitimate call I think) stolen car? Call the police (a legitimate call I think) lost my cat? Call the police (not legit) noisy party you weren't invited to ? Call the police (a legitimate call I think, should it become too rowdy) pothole in road. call police and demand it's filled in (a legitimate call I think, if it is dangerous to road users) car parked on road with VEL that expired yesterday? Dial 999 and ask for police (not legit) While the above are not necessarily emergencies, it is more than likely that people dial 999 because it is a familiar number and can be dialled 24/7. Emergency is a subjective term and most people, I would imagine, feel their call is an emergency. This is all, however, irrelevant in this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|