Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Newbury News
Roof Ornament Thieves Cheat Newbury's State Of The Art CCTV System |
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 01:01 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Oct 3 2012, 11:03 PM) If they are worried about privacy, why not have your system hosted somewhere else; like Newbury has! They spot nothing! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19812385Yawn, I suggest you stop reading 2000AD & Tornado & actually find out how CCTV works.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 01:50 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Oct 4 2012, 02:01 AM) Yawn, I suggest you stop reading 2000AD & Tornado & actually find out how CCTV works. Or not, as appears the case with Newbury's...
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 07:51 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Oct 4 2012, 02:01 AM) Yawn, Shhhhh, troll go sleepy-bye-bye.
--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 08:45 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Oct 4 2012, 02:50 AM) Or not, as appears the case with Newbury's... You quite clearly don't get it. Never mind.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 08:49 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (Simon Kirby @ Oct 4 2012, 08:51 AM) Shhhhh, troll go sleepy-bye-bye. Sorry, did I wake you?
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 10:46 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Oct 4 2012, 09:45 AM) You quite clearly don't get it. Never mind. QUOTE (dannyboy @ Oct 4 2012, 09:49 AM) Sorry, did I wake you? What is clear: 1 You fail to recognise satire. 2 You are over-sensitive to certain criticisms. 3 If you don't like a post, you are quick to insult (see point 2) As for not knowing how CCTV works; that is privileged information, but regardless of the technical reasons, the current CCTV system has not been helpful in protecting the buildings from theft. That is a fact.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 10:50 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Oct 4 2012, 11:46 AM) What is clear:
1 You fail to recognise satire 2 You are sensitive to certain criticisms. 3 If you don't like a post, you are quick to insult (see point 2)
As for not knowing how CCTV works; that is privileged information, but regardless of the technical reasons, the current CCTV has not been helpful in protecting the buildings from theft. That is a fact. Points 1-3, just like every one else, yourself included, who posts on here. CCTV catches hardly any crime in progress. Fact. I'd be amazed if it had caught 1-2 blokes climbing scaffolding in the dead of night, or some bold opportunist during the daytime.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 11:54 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Oct 4 2012, 11:50 AM) Points 1-3, just like every one else, yourself included, who posts on here. No it is not like everyone else, but I have noticed that lately you are numero uno; you seemed to have substituted rational arguments for tiresome and catty posts; even in reply to posts that are not directed at you in person ... or is that the problem; they inadvertently are? QUOTE (dannyboy @ Oct 4 2012, 11:50 AM) CCTV catches hardly any crime in progress. Fact. I'd be amazed if it had caught 1-2 blokes climbing scaffolding in the dead of night, or some bold opportunist during the daytime. So my post is correct?
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 11:55 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Oct 4 2012, 12:54 PM) So my post is correct? Partly. You seem to think it is a problem with Newbury's CCTV. It isn't. It is a problem with all CCTV.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 11:57 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Oct 4 2012, 12:54 PM) No it is not like everyone else, but I have noticed that lately you are numero uno; you seemed to have substituted rational arguments for tiresome and catty posts; even in reply to posts that are not directed at you in person ... or is that the problem; they inadvertently are? Maybe my patience is wearing thin. Same old, same old on this forum......... Tiresome? Stick me on ignore.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 12:00 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Oct 4 2012, 12:55 PM) Partly. You seem to think it is a problem with Newbury's CCTV. It isn't. It is a problem with all CCTV. But it is a problem with our system, but it makes you wonder why they are so popular if it is commonly known that they are so ineffective. Or is it maybe because it is not CCTV that is problem, but the application?
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 12:03 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Oct 4 2012, 12:57 PM) Maybe my patience is wearing thin. Same old, same old on this forum.........
Tiresome? Stick me on ignore. If your patience has worn so thin, perhaps you might consider your own advice.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 12:05 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Oct 4 2012, 01:03 PM) If your patience has worn so thin, perhaps you might consider your own advice. Why I am not bothered by it.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 12:08 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,012
Joined: 22-September 09
Member No.: 357
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Oct 4 2012, 12:55 PM) Partly. You seem to think it is a problem with Newbury's CCTV. It isn't. It is a problem with all CCTV. You may be correct that it is a problem with all CCTV; but only Newbury made me pay a contribution for a system that at worst does not work and at best is no better in solving crime than the old cheaper system.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 12:10 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Oct 4 2012, 01:05 PM) Why I am not bothered by it. Being honest to yourself is the first step towards recovery. Anyway, what about Newbury's rubbish CCTV system. They don't even have a better idea than a 5 day window of when the event occurred. I'd have thought an avid CCTV monitoring operative might have at least cast a gaze over the building site once during the week, considering scaffolds offer opportunist easy access to things they might not otherwise consider. Or is that maybe another reason why, perhaps there aren't any operatives to do it.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 12:21 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Oct 4 2012, 01:10 PM) I'd have thought an avid CCTV monitoring operative might have at least cast a gaze over the building site once during the week, considering scaffolds offer opportunist easy access to things they might not otherwise consider. Or is that maybe another reason why, perhaps there aren't any operatives to do it. CCTV isn't like something out of Mission Impossible.
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|