IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Ticked-off at the BBC
Simon Kirby
post May 2 2014, 08:41 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



Bit on the Beeb's web site about ticks. Must be a quiet news day with the commons on holiday. Anyhoo, if you're familiar with these little arachnids (and if you walk a dog around Newbury you're likely to be familiar enough with ticks) you'll know they can be a nuisance, but are relatively easy to control.

So I'm ticked off with the BBC's article, because this is how it describes removing a tick:
QUOTE
And for those unsure how to remove a tick? Use fine tipped tweezers, or a tick-removal tool, to grasp the tick by the head as close to the skin as possible. Pull firmly and steadily, without twisting, as this could increase the risk of infection by prompting the tick to regurgitate saliva into the bite wound.


That's terrible advice. If you squeeze the tick in tweezers that's sure as anything to inject it's contents into the bite, and that's a very bad idea. And you won't get the bugger out by pulling, so don't try, because it's body will come away and leave its mouthparts behind and that can get quite nasty.

They unwind anti-clockwise, and if you get one of the little tick-twiddlers from the vets it's a cinch, just a couple of turns and off it comes.

And I think it could have mentioned Frontline and Advantage which virtually immunize dogs and cats against ticks - very effective.

Ticks are nasty and carry some unpleasant diseases, but they're pretty simple to control and not something to start a panic over.


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post May 3 2014, 08:36 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



Glad to see you correctly referred to them as arachnids.
So many, including so called "experts", mistake them as insects.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post May 3 2014, 08:53 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



Reading the title I thought the thread was going to be about Clarkson! laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pbonnay
post May 3 2014, 01:57 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 318
Joined: 4-August 12
Member No.: 8,791



My last dog used to get a lot of ticks and I never just pulled them out because, as Simon mentions, it can leave the head embedded and lead to infection.

I used to put meths, lighter fuel or even gin on first (that's a drop on the tick, not pouring it over the dog!) and then after a minute or two they come out a lot more easily.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post May 3 2014, 05:02 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



I was told that smothering them in petroleum jelly suffocates them and they release.
Does that work?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post May 3 2014, 05:36 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



QUOTE (Biker1 @ May 3 2014, 06:02 PM) *
I was told that smothering them in petroleum jelly suffocates them and they release.
Does that work?

Twisting them out with the twiddler is so effective it's not something I'd try any more, and I can't remember it being very effective either.


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brewmaster
post May 4 2014, 06:01 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 165
Joined: 17-July 09
Member No.: 201



QUOTE (Simon Kirby @ May 3 2014, 06:36 PM) *
Twisting them out with the twiddler is so effective it's not something I'd try any more, and I can't remember it being very effective either.

Que?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pbonnay
post May 4 2014, 06:32 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 318
Joined: 4-August 12
Member No.: 8,791



QUOTE (Brewmaster @ May 4 2014, 07:01 PM) *
Que?


I think Simon meant the twiddler is so effective that the alternative (suffocation with petroleum jelly) is not something he would do anymore.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post May 5 2014, 07:41 AM
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (Simon Kirby @ May 3 2014, 06:36 PM) *
Twisting them out with the twiddler is so effective it's not something I'd try any more, and I can't remember it being very effective either.

I'll have to find another use for my petroleum jelly then! wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post May 12 2014, 07:52 AM
Post #10


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



Anyone been walking at The Chase lately?
Had one on the dog AND ONE ON ME after walking there yesterday!!! angry.gif sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post May 12 2014, 10:48 AM
Post #11


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



QUOTE (Biker1 @ May 12 2014, 08:52 AM) *
Anyone been walking at The Chase lately?
Had one on the dog AND ONE ON ME after walking there yesterday!!! angry.gif sad.gif

I've been back there once since the National Trust did what they did there - it's far from dog-friendly now. But the ticks are about, found two, but Frontline usually kills them quite effectively.


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 05:21 PM