IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> WARNING: VED (Road Tax in layman terms) will not transfer to new owner, more expense in Tory/Lib Dem Britain
Andy Capp
post Jan 18 2014, 01:43 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



It would seem while not having to display a tax disk might be handy, the government are salivating at a prospect of an estimated £58,000,000.00 windfall tax next year, as your tax will not carry to the new owner!

http://www.adventurebikerider.com/news/100...een-owners.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Strafin
post Jan 18 2014, 01:46 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 55



How would that generate so much extra tax? Is that an estimate just based on overlapping costs? Seems a lot, but I agree it's a pain. VED should be abolished anyway.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Jan 18 2014, 03:33 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Strafin @ Jan 18 2014, 01:46 PM) *
How would that generate so much extra tax? Is that an estimate just based on overlapping costs? Seems a lot, but I agree it's a pain. VED should be abolished anyway.

Just a rough cut guess.

About 7 million used vehicles get sold every year. If the average vehicle has half a month’s VED remaining, that equates to 3.5 million extra months of VED per year (291,666 years’ worth) down the drain (you can only claim back full months). If the average annual VED cost per vehicle is £200, that works out to about £58,333,200 every year, assuming the car is re-taxed and the original owner buys an taxes another car in the same month, so it's rather tenuous really.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Jan 19 2014, 09:52 AM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



Currently, if you sell a vehicle, you can take off the tax disc and send it back to DVLA for refund (on the remaining complete months).
The new owner can then re-tax.
Can this principle not be used with the new system?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MontyPython
post Jan 19 2014, 10:09 AM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 936
Joined: 16-June 12
Member No.: 8,755



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Jan 19 2014, 09:52 AM) *
Currently, if you sell a vehicle, you can take off the tax disc and send it back to DVLA for refund (on the remaining complete months).
The new owner can then re-tax.
Can this principle not be used with the new system?


That is what will happen.

What Andy was highlighting is that you can not leave the tax disc with the vehicle. As there is no refund for part months you will then have the situation that the sale of a car from me to you today, will require us both to have paid VED for the month of January.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Exhausted
post Jan 19 2014, 12:21 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,722
Joined: 4-September 09
Member No.: 320



QUOTE (MontyPython @ Jan 19 2014, 10:09 AM) *
What Andy was highlighting is that you can not leave the tax disc with the vehicle. As there is no refund for part months you will then have the situation that the sale of a car from me to you today, will require us both to have paid VED for the month of January.


I'm not sure that there is much difference with the current system other than perhaps you could sell the remaining tax to the new owner but if I returned the disc for a refund on 3rd January, I would get a refund for Feb, Mar and so on and the new owner would have to purchase tax for January which I have already paid and is forfeit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post Jan 19 2014, 03:59 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



Seems like quite an over estimation.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Jan 19 2014, 05:19 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Exhausted @ Jan 19 2014, 12:21 PM) *
I'm not sure that there is much difference with the current system other than perhaps you could sell the remaining tax to the new owner but if I returned the disc for a refund on 3rd January, I would get a refund for Feb, Mar and so on and the new owner would have to purchase tax for January which I have already paid and is forfeit.

Have you read and understood the OP? blink.gif

QUOTE (user23 @ Jan 19 2014, 03:59 PM) *
Seems like quite an over estimation.

Perhaps you could articulate why?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NWNREADER
post Jan 19 2014, 06:16 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265



The Government is being quite slick, as they should increase income as well as save on expenditure. No cost of paper, printing, posting etc, and all those cars that still have tax on the car when they sell it - especially privately - will be void. Up until now the VED has applied to the car, now it will apply to the car and keeper. Will catch out many, especially when Dad gifts his car to son/daughter......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
motormad
post Jan 19 2014, 11:47 PM
Post #10


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,970
Joined: 29-December 09
From: Dogging in a car park somewhere
Member No.: 592



Problem is, who buys a car without tax these days... I certainly won't, if someone is cheap enough to claim back £50 then I think about how they have skimped elsewhere.

Stupid government idea... yet again...


--------------------
:p
Grammar: the difference between knowing your poop and knowing you're poop.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Jan 20 2014, 09:56 AM
Post #11


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (motormad @ Jan 20 2014, 01:47 AM) *
Problem is, who buys a car without tax these days...

Well, possibly you will.
As the OP says "your tax will not carry to the new owner"!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Claude
post Jan 20 2014, 10:07 AM
Post #12


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 222
Joined: 17-May 13
Member No.: 9,574



How to transport a used car having just bought it is what concerns me most. I'm intrigued to see how the scheme addresses this issue.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Jan 20 2014, 10:51 AM
Post #13


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (Claude @ Jan 20 2014, 10:07 AM) *
How to transport a used car having just bought it is what concerns me most. I'm intrigued to see how the scheme addresses this issue.

More importantly, you'd have to have arranged insurance beforehand, unless you have existing insurance and it covers driving any vehicle.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MontyPython
post Jan 20 2014, 12:34 PM
Post #14


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 936
Joined: 16-June 12
Member No.: 8,755



QUOTE (JeffG @ Jan 20 2014, 10:51 AM) *
More importantly, you'd have to have arranged insurance beforehand, unless you have existing insurance and it covers driving any vehicle.



You have to do that currently - so that won't be affected by this change!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Claude
post Jan 20 2014, 02:16 PM
Post #15


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 222
Joined: 17-May 13
Member No.: 9,574



QUOTE (JeffG @ Jan 20 2014, 10:51 AM) *
More importantly, you'd have to have arranged insurance beforehand, unless you have existing insurance and it covers driving any vehicle.

As said, this scheme has absolutely no impact on being insured when you buy a used car, it's not changing anything which does or doesn't happen today from that perspective.

For info you can get short-term car insurance, which I've used in the past for test-driving vehicles I have and haven't ended up purchasing.

Anyway, most 'standard' comprehensive policies allow you to drive other vehicles (providing you have the owner's permission) but you're only covered on a third party basis, I think. For me that rules out driving any car worth over £500.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Strafin
post Jan 20 2014, 06:45 PM
Post #16


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 55



QUOTE (Claude @ Jan 20 2014, 10:07 AM) *
How to transport a used car having just bought it is what concerns me most. I'm intrigued to see how the scheme addresses this issue.

Presumably some sort of online instant cover, but to be honest in the unlikely event of you getting pulled, the database would still show the car as being taxed, because the paperwork wouldn't have been completed at the DVLA that quickly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Claude
post Jan 21 2014, 09:00 AM
Post #17


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 222
Joined: 17-May 13
Member No.: 9,574



QUOTE (Strafin @ Jan 20 2014, 06:45 PM) *
Presumably some sort of online instant cover, but to be honest in the unlikely event of you getting pulled, the database would still show the car as being taxed, because the paperwork wouldn't have been completed at the DVLA that quickly.

In the unlikely event that you get pulled you won't have a tax disc displayed because the previous owner will have been obliged to keep it.

If I buy a car in deepest, darkest Cornwall there is little phone signal let alone enough to allow me to get internet connection on my phone, so I still await how one gets around the 'getting it home' issue. My guess is there'll be a grace period of 7 days to get it sorted... Time will tell.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Jan 21 2014, 09:18 AM
Post #18


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



It is currently possible for any individual to report what they think may be an untaxed vehicle to DVLA.
With this new system this will not be possible as there is no identifying mark.
Is this desirable?
(Probably, to those who choose not to pay it! sad.gif )
Maybe it is time to be even more radical and scrap VED altogether?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post Jan 21 2014, 09:52 AM
Post #19


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Jan 21 2014, 09:18 AM) *
It is currently possible for any individual to report what they think may be an untaxed vehicle to DVLA.
With this new system this will not be possible as there is no identifying mark.
Is this desirable?
(Probably, to those who choose not to pay it! sad.gif )
Maybe it is time to be even more radical and scrap VED altogether?



ANPR will be everywhere......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Jan 21 2014, 11:55 AM
Post #20


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (dannyboy @ Jan 21 2014, 10:52 AM) *
ANPR will be everywhere......

Will it?
Are you sure?
What, more than it is now?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd April 2024 - 06:13 PM