IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  « < 5 6 7  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> EU fail #1: low CO2 targets and filthy diesels cars
Andy Capp
post Dec 27 2017, 11:11 AM
Post #121


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,438
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



An interesting article: How toxic is your car exhaust? It's not easy to find out
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SirWilliam
post Dec 27 2017, 06:42 PM
Post #122


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 406
Joined: 6-March 14
From: West Berks
Member No.: 10,341



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Dec 27 2017, 11:11 AM) *


Must admit I got half way through reading this unmitigating drivel before returning to the well deceased turkey sandwich . The question is somewhat rhetorical in that the answer is of only academic interest . I can not see the average motorist upgrading his car just because it happens to be belching out more pollutant than a spanking new model . ALL internal combustion engines pollute , as do external and electric to a degree , but only a complete sandal wearing idiot would advocate the removal of all vehicles without first having a viable alternative .


--------------------
Si non prius succederent.......... relinquere
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Dec 27 2017, 08:31 PM
Post #123


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,438
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (SirWilliam @ Dec 27 2017, 06:42 PM) *
Must admit I got half way through reading this unmitigating drivel before returning to the well deceased turkey sandwich . The question is somewhat rhetorical in that the answer is of only academic interest . I can not see the average motorist upgrading his car just because it happens to be belching out more pollutant than a spanking new model . ALL internal combustion engines pollute , as do external and electric to a degree , but only a complete sandal wearing idiot would advocate the removal of all vehicles without first having a viable alternative .

If you would have been capable of reading the whole thing and understand it, you may have posted a more relevant point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TallDarkAndHands...
post Dec 27 2017, 08:50 PM
Post #124


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,773
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (SirWilliam @ Dec 27 2017, 06:42 PM) *
Must admit I got half way through reading this unmitigating drivel before returning to the well deceased turkey sandwich . The question is somewhat rhetorical in that the answer is of only academic interest . I can not see the average motorist upgrading his car just because it happens to be belching out more pollutant than a spanking new model . ALL internal combustion engines pollute , as do external and electric to a degree , but only a complete sandal wearing idiot would advocate the removal of all vehicles without first having a viable alternative .


Yeah. Give up plastic. Thats the "flavour" of the month. Leave them cars alone. I cant cope with anymore people on my train commute!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Dec 28 2017, 12:41 AM
Post #125


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,438
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



A big message in the article is that the way the emissions are monitored is hugely flawed. The message in this “drivel” is that the people we pay to keep us safer are failing to do their job.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SirWilliam
post Dec 28 2017, 09:12 AM
Post #126


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 406
Joined: 6-March 14
From: West Berks
Member No.: 10,341



Good to see hostilities have commenced after the festive break . My argument stands in that the article was long winded and irrelevant to the the headline as more inches were devoted to the French holiday than the subject matter . I am not doubting the figure of £3-10 K to test a car's emissions / mpg, just questioning the wisdom of doing it when it solves nothing .


--------------------
Si non prius succederent.......... relinquere
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Dec 28 2017, 12:25 PM
Post #127


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,438
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (SirWilliam @ Dec 28 2017, 09:12 AM) *
Good to see hostilities have commenced after the festive break . My argument stands in that the article was long winded and irrelevant to the the headline as more inches were devoted to the French holiday than the subject matter . I am not doubting the figure of £3-10 K to test a car's emissions / mpg, just questioning the wisdom of doing it when it solves nothing .

Your argument was incoherent and remains so.


Happy new year. tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Dec 28 2017, 02:48 PM
Post #128


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,791
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



All cars chuck out pollutants.
If it bothers you that much then cut down on your driving or don't do it at all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Dec 28 2017, 03:19 PM
Post #129


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,438
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Dec 28 2017, 02:48 PM) *
All cars chuck out pollutants.
If it bothers you that much then cut down on your driving or don't do it at all.

Whether something is a pollutant isn’t the substantive point being made.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Jan 18 2018, 11:08 AM
Post #130


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,365
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



"Microwaves emit 7.7 million tonnes of carbon dioxide per year in the EU, which is equivalent to the annual emissions of 6.8 million cars, says University of Manchester study"
Scientifically proven! laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif


--------------------
Like a Boss!! 😎
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Jan 18 2018, 11:24 PM
Post #131


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,438
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (je suis Charlie @ Jan 18 2018, 11:08 AM) *
"Microwaves emit 7.7 million tonnes of carbon dioxide per year in the EU, which is equivalent to the annual emissions of 6.8 million cars, says University of Manchester study"
Scientifically proven! laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif

Put into context, 10 years ago there were ~250 million cars on the road in the EU, so 6.8 million is a small percentage of the whole.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Turin Machine
post Jan 18 2018, 11:26 PM
Post #132


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,029
Joined: 23-September 10
From: In the lower 40
Member No.: 1,104



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Jan 18 2018, 11:24 PM) *
Put into context, 10 years ago there were 250 million cars on the road, so 6.8 million is a small percentage of the whole.

Nah, can't argue with science, fact innit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Turin Machine
post Jan 18 2018, 11:44 PM
Post #133


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,029
Joined: 23-September 10
From: In the lower 40
Member No.: 1,104



This'll make you smile, Volvo XC90 hybrid, how much for a new battery? 2k? 4k?, Can't be more than that shuuurly! Oh dear, 22k! That's twenty two thousand pounds. And they are only warranted from new for 7 years. Hybrid cars? Don't think I'll be buying one soon. laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SirWilliam
post Jan 19 2018, 09:25 AM
Post #134


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 406
Joined: 6-March 14
From: West Berks
Member No.: 10,341



QUOTE (Turin Machine @ Jan 18 2018, 11:44 PM) *
This'll make you smile, Volvo XC90 hybrid, how much for a new battery? 2k? 4k?, Can't be more than that shuuurly! Oh dear, 22k! That's twenty two thousand pounds. And they are only warranted from new for 7 years. Hybrid cars? Don't think I'll be buying one soon. laugh.gif


Smile? State of horror more like. One wonders if the salesman, ( sorry person ), empathised this on the test run. With government(s) pushing the electric agenda a sceptic may conclude that it is designed to price Mr and Mrs Average off the roads.


--------------------
Si non prius succederent.......... relinquere
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Jan 19 2018, 03:49 PM
Post #135


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,365
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (Turin Machine @ Jan 18 2018, 11:44 PM) *
This'll make you smile, Volvo XC90 hybrid, how much for a new battery? 2k? 4k?, Can't be more than that shuuurly! Oh dear, 22k! That's twenty two thousand pounds. And they are only warranted from new for 7 years. Hybrid cars? Don't think I'll be buying one soon. laugh.gif

It's why I didn't go for the XC90. And, inbuilt unreliability. From Volvo as well. Sigh!


--------------------
Like a Boss!! 😎
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  « < 5 6 7
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd January 2018 - 07:44 AM