IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  « < 5 6 7  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Council admit election pledge is unworkable
Biker1
post Jul 5 2011, 08:27 AM
Post #121


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Jul 4 2011, 07:12 PM) *
BR was hardly a shining light, with all their strikes.

Yes, blame them.
It was they who designed and built the HST's and "clapped out" trains that we have on our line now!
Come to think of it, it was BR who designed and built the current signalling and delay times at Thatcham level crossing too! tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CharlieF
post Jul 8 2011, 12:37 PM
Post #122


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 166
Joined: 21-March 11
From: Newbury
Member No.: 3,706



All the railway crossings and bridges are set to be replaced when the line is electrified, this is because the plant required will be unable to access the works area without new access routes in - just look at the hideous 'road' built for access to the construction of the tiny little Monkey Bridge.

The new crossings will not be paid for out of local taxes or even Section 106 money, but will 'unlock' local development, like the Market Street / Station development, Bonemill Lane etc, allowing infill to the areas up to the bypass, that have only escaped development so far because of the inaccessibility..

All of which renders any manifesto pledges on the subject a bit silly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Jul 8 2011, 05:15 PM
Post #123


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (CharlieF @ Jul 8 2011, 01:37 PM) *
All the railway crossings and bridges are set to be replaced when the line is electrified,

Bridges only where necessary if they are not high enough to take the wires.
The crossings will still be the same in the same place. (except they will be controlled from Didcot rather than local boxes).
QUOTE (CharlieF @ Jul 8 2011, 01:37 PM) *
this is because the plant required will be unable to access the works area without new access routes in

The plant required will access the sites, in the main, by rail.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CharlieF
post Jul 8 2011, 06:02 PM
Post #124


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 166
Joined: 21-March 11
From: Newbury
Member No.: 3,706



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Jul 8 2011, 06:15 PM) *
Bridges only where necessary if they are not high enough to take the wires.
The crossings will still be the same in the same place. (except they will be controlled from Didcot rather than local boxes).


Over a hundred bridges & tunnels are scheduled for demolition and rebuilding on the Great Western Mainline between Maidenhead and Bristol for the electrification project. And crossings are either to be lowered to accommodate the overheads or for new crossings over to support the overheads to be constructed.

QUOTE
The plant required will access the sites, in the main, by rail.

You're thinking of the installation works of the power lines rather than the facilitation works of the bridges, tunnels and crossings.

That said of course it's all been put on the back burner a bit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Jul 8 2011, 06:05 PM
Post #125


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (CharlieF @ Jul 8 2011, 07:02 PM) *
Over a hundred bridges & tunnels are scheduled for demolition and rebuilding on the Great Western Mainline between Maidenhead and Bristol for the electrification project. And crossings are either to be lowered to accommodate the overheads or for new crossings over to support the overheads to be constructed.


You're thinking of the installation works of the power lines rather than the facilitation works of the bridges, tunnels and crossings.

That said of course it's all been put on the back burner a bit.

Sorry, I thought we were talking about the line from Reading to Newbury?
No crossings need to be lowered and few bridges need replacing.
(Anglers need to be careful when crossing on foot with their carbon rods though!) tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CharlieF
post Jul 8 2011, 07:05 PM
Post #126


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 166
Joined: 21-March 11
From: Newbury
Member No.: 3,706



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Jul 8 2011, 07:05 PM) *
Sorry, I thought we were talking about the line from Reading to Newbury?
No crossings need to be lowered and few bridges need replacing.
(Anglers need to be careful when crossing on foot with their carbon rods though!) tongue.gif

We are talking about the route though Newbury and they are scheduled.

But the electrification goes a wee bit further. Wales has been axed though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
spartacus
post Jul 8 2011, 07:51 PM
Post #127


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 09
Member No.: 221



We are actually talking (in this thread origin anyway) specifically about the Thatcham level crossing. No tunnel needed there. No 'new bridge' that could be justified as part of the 'electrification project'. Wires will just be strung across the existing crossing point....

What happens east or west of the level crossing may be an entirely different matter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NWNREADER
post Jul 8 2011, 08:21 PM
Post #128


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265



Whatever......
I suspect many of the bridges will be footbridges in any case, so not always a major feat of Brunellian engineering.....

Could be work for travellers, I suppose?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CharlieF
post Jul 9 2011, 12:57 PM
Post #129


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 166
Joined: 21-March 11
From: Newbury
Member No.: 3,706



QUOTE (spartacus @ Jul 8 2011, 08:51 PM) *
We are actually talking (in this thread origin anyway) specifically about the Thatcham level crossing. No tunnel needed there. No 'new bridge' that could be justified as part of the 'electrification project'. Wires will just be strung across the existing crossing point....

What happens east or west of the level crossing may be an entirely different matter.

If and when the electrification goes ahead it's my understanding that the Thatcham crossing is scheduled for modification involves making good the approachs on both sides and remodelling the station area. And no-one in their right mind would plan any locally generated alterations (like a new crossing or bridge) without dovetailing into the main electrification project for economies of scale and minimising of distruption.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Richard Garvie
post Jul 11 2011, 10:49 AM
Post #130


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,974
Joined: 8-September 10
Member No.: 1,076



We are not on the Bristol line, electrication will only take place between Newbury and Reading on our branch. I think four bridges are going to need alterations.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  « < 5 6 7
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 05:52 AM