Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Newbury News
2011 / 10 Budget |
|
|
|
Feb 1 2011, 09:20 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,863
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 41
|
QUOTE (Richard Garvie @ Feb 1 2011, 09:08 AM) Although the budget is not revealed for consumption until the 9th Feb I believe, what can we expect to see? I believe that we are expecting savings of £10m-£12m this financial year, and between £8m-£10m in the following year.
What would you "cut"???
PS: This is the 2011 / 12 budget as you probably gathered!!! How about the salaries of the senior executives
--------------------
Bloggo
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2011, 11:29 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60
|
QUOTE (Iommi @ Feb 1 2011, 11:24 AM) I doubt capping senior exec pay would make a big difference in the wage bill. Not one that would fill the budget deficit anyway. Every little helps..
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2011, 11:31 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20
|
QUOTE (TallDarkAndHandsome @ Feb 1 2011, 11:29 AM) Every little helps.. It does, but 'remuneration envy' won't fix the deficit problem. We need more radical plans to do that.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2011, 12:03 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,863
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 41
|
QUOTE (Iommi @ Feb 1 2011, 11:24 AM) I doubt capping senior exec pay would make a big difference in the wage bill. Not one that would fill the budget deficit anyway. Quite right but it will help. What about taking the company cars away from those that don't really need them anymore because their job no longer requires it or perhaps they now work from home. I wonder if any senior managers have looked at this?
--------------------
Bloggo
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2011, 08:07 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265
|
QUOTE (Bloggo @ Feb 1 2011, 12:03 PM) Quite right but it will help. What about taking the company cars away from those that don't really need them anymore because their job no longer requires it or perhaps they now work from home. I wonder if any senior managers have looked at this? How many employees have 'company cars'? Mostly it is a lease arrangement, for people who use their car regularly for Council business, in lieu of the 40p/mile essential user allowance. The employee usually makes a contribution, but the lease is cheaper for the Council than the monthly lump sum + mileage (all as per HMRC guidelines applicable to any employee in any job for any employee). Take away the lease cars and the monthly allowances paid to staff would be a greater cost.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2011, 08:13 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212
|
QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Feb 1 2011, 08:07 PM) How many employees have 'company cars'?
Mostly it is a lease arrangement, for people who use their car regularly for Council business, in lieu of the 40p/mile essential user allowance. The employee usually makes a contribution, but the lease is cheaper for the Council than the monthly lump sum + mileage (all as per HMRC guidelines applicable to any employee in any job for any employee).
Take away the lease cars and the monthly allowances paid to staff would be a greater cost. You must first define if the lease car is essential though surely? Most council staff above a certain station have one just because it is a status symbol. The question is: Is a car essential for the job they do if they only need one on occasions then a car pool would be more cost effective surely?
--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2011, 08:21 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265
|
QUOTE (Cognosco @ Feb 1 2011, 08:13 PM) You must first define if the lease car is essential though surely? Most council staff above a certain station have one just because it is a status symbol. The question is: Is a car essential for the job they do if they only need one on occasions then a car pool would be more cost effective surely? I understand why you ask, but you do need to know something of the WBC policies on the issue before going for a change. I believe it is so that the scheme is only 'beneficial' at all to certain staff and , as already mentioned, taking the cars away and paying the alternative allowance is more expensive for the Council. The change you propose would likely cost the Council more than the lease car scheme.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2011, 08:47 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,863
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 41
|
QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Feb 1 2011, 08:21 PM) I understand why you ask, but you do need to know something of the WBC policies on the issue before going for a change. I believe it is so that the scheme is only 'beneficial' at all to certain staff and , as already mentioned, taking the cars away and paying the alternative allowance is more expensive for the Council. The change you propose would likely cost the Council more than the lease car scheme. No, you are missing the point. There are those in the Council that have company cars but no longer use them in any great degree for company business. I am suggesting that the management reveiw this situation to make a judgement if it is still necessary saving the tax payer money. I am not suggesting that they take the cars away from those that genuinely need them to do the job. All you need to know about WBC policies is are they up to date and cost effective.
--------------------
Bloggo
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|