Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Newbury News
Independent parties prove to be a growing influence |
|
|
|
May 1 2015, 05:56 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 114
Joined: 16-March 15
Member No.: 10,567
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Apr 30 2015, 09:33 PM) It seems you are incapable of being civil unless you are engaging with someone with which you agree. Perhaps after your relentless rudeness, sarcasm and hyperbole, you might find some time to debate? But I won't hold my breath, although I suspect you wish I would, such is the length of time we might have to wait. Actually, Mr Capp I was using one of your well know phrases (“you can’t educate pork”), which you used when being rude to other posters. So calling be uncivil is a bit rich coming from you. I also answered your naïve question, but I think this has more to do with you chickening out of replying. You will find that most pretentious men who can’t get one over on a woman will either revert to abuse or run away and hide or camouflage themselves as a hurt and wounded animal. Your problem, Mr Capp is that your sacks (testiculus) are larger than your cerebrum cella and that has always given you (as in men) a disadvantage when trying to deal with an intelligent hierarchic female. So why is it ok for you to be “rude, sarcastic and hyperbole,” while others have to accept your hypocrisy? The other trick you normally do when fearing a superior person, as opposed to your low level abilities, is put them on ignore. Never mind Mr Capp, it is not you or I who will judge, or even those at the same level as your-self on here, but the audience that comes to the circus to be amused, educated and get jovial hilarity. Yours, Petra
|
|
|
|
|
May 1 2015, 06:45 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 2,682
Joined: 23-September 10
From: In the lower 40
Member No.: 1,104
|
QUOTE (Petra @ May 1 2015, 06:56 PM) Actually, Mr Capp I was using one of your well know phrases (“you can’t educate pork”), which you used when being rude to other posters. So calling be uncivil is a bit rich coming from you. I also answered your naïve question, but I think this has more to do with you chickening out of replying. You will find that most pretentious men who can’t get one over on a woman will either revert to abuse or run away and hide or camouflage themselves as a hurt and wounded animal. Your problem, Mr Capp is that your sacks (testiculus) are larger than your cerebrum cella and that has always given you (as in men) a disadvantage when trying to deal with an intelligent hierarchic female.
So why is it ok for you to be “rude, sarcastic and hyperbole,” while others have to accept your hypocrisy? The other trick you normally do when fearing a superior person, as opposed to your low level abilities, is put them on ignore. Never mind Mr Capp, it is not you or I who will judge, or even those at the same level as your-self on here, but the audience that comes to the circus to be amused, educated and get jovial hilarity.
Yours, Petra When you say "cerebum cells" are you in fact referring to the lateral ventricle? Or are you paraphrasing again? Oh, and you can't be hyperbole, you can only use it. Come on, try to keep up at the back there!
--------------------
Gammon. And proud!
|
|
|
|
|
May 1 2015, 07:15 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (Petra @ May 1 2015, 06:56 PM) Actually, Mr Capp I was using one of your well know phrases (“you can’t educate pork”), which you used when being rude to other posters. So calling be uncivil is a bit rich coming from you. I also answered your naïve question, but I think this has more to do with you chickening out of replying. You will find that most pretentious men who can’t get one over on a woman will either revert to abuse or run away and hide or camouflage themselves as a hurt and wounded animal. Your problem, Mr Capp is that your sacks (testiculus) are larger than your cerebrum cella and that has always given you (as in men) a disadvantage when trying to deal with an intelligent hierarchic female.
So why is it ok for you to be “rude, sarcastic and hyperbole,” while others have to accept your hypocrisy? The other trick you normally do when fearing a superior person, as opposed to your low level abilities, is put them on ignore. Never mind Mr Capp, it is not you or I who will judge, or even those at the same level as your-self on here, but the audience that comes to the circus to be amused, educated and get jovial hilarity.
Yours, Petra I did post a big reply, but I scrubbed it when I realised I would look as daft as you.
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2015, 09:14 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103
|
QUOTE (Turin Machine @ May 1 2015, 07:45 PM) When you say "cerebum cells" are you in fact referring to the lateral ventricle? Or are you paraphrasing again? Oh, and you can't be hyperbole, you can only use it. Come on, try to keep up at the back there! And I always thought that when used in anatomy it is the scrotal sac than Andy has there?
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2015, 12:21 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,722
Joined: 4-September 09
Member No.: 320
|
QUOTE (Turin Machine @ May 2 2015, 10:50 AM) Actually, the testiculus are commonly referred to as the male gonads and are carried within the sac. Perhaps one of her girlfriends has been advising her (badly) again. Load of old b0llocks I reckon
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2015, 03:27 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011
|
QUOTE (Turin Machine @ May 2 2015, 10:50 AM) Actually, the testiculus are commonly referred to as the male gonads and are carried within the sac. Perhaps one of her girlfriends has been advising her (badly) again. Testiculus? I call Godwin's Rule!
--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2015, 06:21 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (Exhausted @ May 2 2015, 01:21 PM) Load of old b0llocks I reckon Technically, testiculus is a load of old b0llock, but I suspect when people like Petra base a post on a Google search without understanding the subject in the first place, they will be vulnerable to getting it wrong. I should know, I do it all the time. LOL!
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|