Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Newbury News
|
|
Save the Lollipop Lady |
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 08:07 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011
|
There's a petition to save the job of one of the lollipop ladies threatened with redundancy by the WBC cuts. If I understand the story right, WBC provide eight lollipop ladies at a total cost of £16k, so all things being equal it looks like a lollipop lady costs the Council £2k to employ. That seems pretty cheap to me actually at less than £10 per day, but if there is no obligation to provide the service then I can see the sense in making the saving, even if for just £16k, as there are other more critical services which would hit more vulnerable people which I wouldn't like to see. The NWN says that 100 people have signed the petition. I understand that a lollipop lady is a very good idea and I can see how parents wouldn't want to lose the service, So I'm wondering if those 100 signatories couldn't just contribute £20 each. Job done.
--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 09:10 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
This will end up as a classic political issue; but one where we actually some real leadership. Yes, lollipop ladies are nice to have and yes, a redundancy is sad, BUT for the most part, the lollipop lady is unneeded. There are generally 'mothers' about and if there are specific issues, it's a Police matter.
The local Councillors, of both parties (given that the cuts are a result of coalition decisions) should be presenting and vigorously supporting the Councils case here.
If the school users think it would help, surely the School PTA could work something out, even a voluntary rota.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 09:20 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50
|
QUOTE (Simon Kirby @ Nov 7 2013, 08:07 PM) There's a petition to save the job of one of the lollipop ladies threatened with redundancy by the WBC cuts. If I understand the story right, WBC provide eight lollipop ladies at a total cost of £16k, so all things being equal it looks like a lollipop lady costs the Council £2k to employ. That seems pretty cheap to me actually at less than £10 per day, but if there is no obligation to provide the service then I can see the sense in making the saving, even if for just £16k, as there are other more critical services which would hit more vulnerable people which I wouldn't like to see. The NWN says that 100 people have signed the petition. I understand that a lollipop lady is a very good idea and I can see how parents wouldn't want to lose the service, So I'm wondering if those 100 signatories couldn't just contribute £20 each. Job done. Or the signatories could volunteer to do the task themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 09:33 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 7 2013, 09:20 PM) Or the signatories could volunteer to do the task themselves. Absolutely! Having to do something or put your hand in your pocket always adds reality and strength to such things.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 09:37 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Nov 7 2013, 09:33 PM) Absolutely! Having to do something or put your hand in your pocket always adds reality and strength to such things. How many school days are there a year? A complete guess, perhaps 200? They'd need to do it twice a year.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 09:52 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Nov 7 2013, 09:48 PM) A thought gas struck me in that NTC employ 'wardens' who keep an eye on the locality. They try to get themselves known to the residents and involve them in their work. This might be an ideal opportunity for them, an hour a day doing traffic duties? Greater justification for their role in the NTC review... Do they? I thought the BID employed them?
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 10:03 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 7 2013, 09:52 PM) Do they? I thought the BID employed them? Not sure, last time I looked albeit a good while back it was NTC, but things may well have moved on. It's an interesting and pertinent point though; is the BID part of the democratic / service delivery process? Thinking about it, that's the ideal home for Tourist Information.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 10:08 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Nov 7 2013, 10:03 PM) Not sure, last time I looked albeit a good while back it was NTC, but things may well have moved on. It's an interesting and pertinent point though; is the BID part of the democratic / service delivery process? Thinking about it, that's the ideal home for Tourist Information. It depends for which reason one would want to provide tourist information, to increase business or to promote the town generally. If it's the former then it's the BID, if it's the latter then it's NTC.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 10:10 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011
|
QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 7 2013, 09:52 PM) Do they? I thought the BID employed them? I think the the BID employ some wardens, but the Town Council also fund wardens with £54k of public money who I think are employed by Sovereign
--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 10:25 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 2,945
Joined: 5-June 09
Member No.: 130
|
QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 7 2013, 09:20 PM) Or the signatories could volunteer to do the task themselves. Or cough up £1 a week to pay the lollipop lady.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 10:33 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 936
Joined: 16-June 12
Member No.: 8,755
|
QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 7 2013, 09:20 PM) Or the signatories could volunteer to do the task themselves. That wouldn't save the Lollipop lady from redundancy though! It depends what the petition is trying to do, protect the employee or save the service. Of course the PTA could try and fund her, in future years they can do it from funds raised from a fete or other event that most schools seem to arrange!
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2013, 11:00 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011
|
QUOTE (blackdog @ Nov 7 2013, 10:25 PM) Or cough up £1 a week to pay the lollipop lady. Perhaps they could sell lollipops. Or cough drops.
--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2013, 09:06 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,970
Joined: 29-December 09
From: Dogging in a car park somewhere
Member No.: 592
|
QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 7 2013, 09:37 PM) How many school days are there a year? A complete guess, perhaps 200?
They'd need to do it twice a year. There are probably more days of health and safety briefing and training than what they'd actually work.
--------------------
:p Grammar: the difference between knowing your poop and knowing you're poop.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2013, 01:43 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 390
Joined: 26-August 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 303
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Nov 7 2013, 09:10 PM) The local Councillors, of both parties (given that the cuts are a result of coalition decisions) should be presenting and vigorously supporting the Councils case here. The fact that the local Liberal Democrat Party is opposing these questionable cuts to what are for many essential services demonstrates that they do not follow their Coalition leaders who have questionably acquiesced to the Conservative Party on too many things. These are difficult times, but aiming the cuts at the vulnerable is plain heartless to say the least. Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera Councillor for Victoria Ward and Deputy Leader
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2013, 02:00 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 810
Joined: 13-August 09
Member No.: 271
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Nov 7 2013, 09:48 PM) A thought gas struck me in that NTC employ 'wardens' who keep an eye on the locality. They try to get themselves known to the residents and involve them in their work. This might be an ideal opportunity for them, an hour a day doing traffic duties? Greater justification for their role in the NTC review... No lawful entitlement to stop vehicles I'm afraid. Same for 'volunteer parents'.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2013, 02:21 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (Berkshirelad @ Nov 8 2013, 02:00 PM) No lawful entitlement to stop vehicles I'm afraid.
Same for 'volunteer parents'. OK, lets just stop the whole thing - there isn't any need for lollipop ladies anyway! By the way, there are other ways of making kids cross roads safely, as any parent will tell you. If there is no lawful entitlement for volunteers to stop traffic, there ain't any for 'employed' ones either!
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|