IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Business Rate Retention
blackdog
post Jun 22 2017, 09:15 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,945
Joined: 5-June 09
Member No.: 130



Someone commenting on the Queen's Speech yesterday noted that the Tory plans on Business Rate Retention were not mentioned - implying that this means that they won't go ahead.

Bad news for West Berkshire if this is the case.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
blackdog
post Jun 27 2017, 05:26 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,945
Joined: 5-June 09
Member No.: 130



Despite the lack of a Local Government Finance Bill, a Department for Communities and Local Government spokeswoman said: 'The Government is committed to delivering the manifesto pledge to help local authorities control more of the money they raise and will work closely with local government to agree the best way to achieve this.' (source)

It seems that this is a controversial move within the Tory party - perhaps because most of the councils that will gain from the move are solid Tory.

And I was wrong about the date of the last Local Government Finace Act, there was one in 2012.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Jun 27 2017, 05:54 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (blackdog @ Jun 27 2017, 06:26 PM) *
Despite the lack of a Local Government Finance Bill, a Department for Communities and Local Government spokeswoman said: 'The Government is committed to delivering the manifesto pledge to help local authorities control more of the money they raise and will work closely with local government to agree the best way to achieve this.' (source)

It seems that this is a controversial move within the Tory party - perhaps because most of the councils that will gain from the move are solid Tory.

And I was wrong about the date of the last Local Government Finace Act, there was one in 2012.


So no change then! Simply like before, when RB has a chat and explains nicely that the latest are just a bit too far, bung back a few bob as 'transitional financing' and job done.



--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Jun 27 2017, 09:31 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (On the edge @ Jun 27 2017, 06:54 PM) *
So no change then! Simply like before, when RB has a chat and explains nicely that the latest are just a bit too far, bung back a few bob as 'transitional financing' and job done.

Yup. tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Jun 29 2017, 06:58 AM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (je suis Charlie @ Jun 27 2017, 10:31 PM) *
Yup. tongue.gif


Of course, there wouldn't be anywhere near the problem there is today if lush subsidies doshed out to devolved regional 'Governments' were eliminated. Ironic, that even the Labour promoter of the worst excess recognises it went on far too long. Given recent events the door for change here has been slammed shut. Logic should be telling us that with our solid Tory Councils and Tory MP with a solid majority, WBC's chances of a financial respite are slim indeed; as the saying goes, 'why give a sucker an even break?'


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Jun 29 2017, 07:31 AM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (On the edge @ Jun 29 2017, 07:58 AM) *
Of course, there wouldn't be anywhere near the problem there is today if lush subsidies doshed out to devolved regional 'Governments' were eliminated. Ironic, that even the Labour promoter of the worst excess recognises it went on far too long. Given recent events the door for change here has been slammed shut. Logic should be telling us that with our solid Tory Councils and Tory MP with a solid majority, WBC's chances of a financial respite are slim indeed; as the saying goes, 'why give a sucker an even break?'

Yup.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 03:09 AM