IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

12 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 11 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> A34 speed limit petition
Berkshirelad
post Nov 28 2016, 10:14 AM
Post #161


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 810
Joined: 13-August 09
Member No.: 271



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Nov 25 2016, 09:52 AM) *
All these so called solutions all seem to remove the reason for the road which was built, as we know from by-pass protest days, as a high speed link between the South Coast and the Midlands.


A bit further actually. The A34 was originally the Portsmouth-Preston trunk road
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Berkshirelad
post Nov 28 2016, 10:17 AM
Post #162


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 810
Joined: 13-August 09
Member No.: 271



QUOTE (JeffG @ Nov 25 2016, 09:02 AM) *
I don't mind them. I just set cruise control to 50 or whatever it is, and hope that those that pass me get caught.


Set at 50 mph on your speedometer - then you will be travelling at less than 50 mph and I, for one, will be one of those passing you

What amuses me about ASC is those who brake to pass the cameras, thus demonstrating their intellectual ability to understand the word average
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Nov 28 2016, 10:32 AM
Post #163


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (Berkshirelad @ Nov 28 2016, 10:17 AM) *
Set at 50 mph on your speedometer - then you will be travelling at less than 50 mph and I, for one, will be one of those passing you

What amuses me about ASC is those who brake to pass the cameras, thus demonstrating their intellectual ability to understand the word average

I just quoted a figure. I am fully aware that speedos underread and set my speed accordingly, e.g. in a thirty I usually drive at around 32-33 indicated (not on cc obviously). I wish my all singing all dancing dash display would show me GPS speed as an alternative.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gel
post Nov 30 2016, 07:24 AM
Post #164


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 948
Joined: 11-September 09
From: Thames Valley
Member No.: 337



A34 from Chieveley North to be considered for upgrade to Expressway:

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/14936453....dge_Expressway/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blackdog
post Nov 30 2016, 02:33 PM
Post #165


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,945
Joined: 5-June 09
Member No.: 130



QUOTE (gel @ Nov 30 2016, 07:24 AM) *
A34 from Chieveley North to be considered for upgrade to Expressway:

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/14936453....dge_Expressway/


What is an 'expressway'? What sort of standard of road are they suggesting?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gel
post Nov 30 2016, 06:47 PM
Post #166


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 948
Joined: 11-September 09
From: Thames Valley
Member No.: 337



QUOTE (blackdog @ Nov 30 2016, 02:33 PM) *
What is an 'expressway'? What sort of standard of road are they suggesting?

Presumably not the road in Newbury where the dairy is!
see:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/565364/Mi...echnology-Wi-Fi
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post Nov 30 2016, 07:22 PM
Post #167


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (gel @ Nov 30 2016, 06:47 PM) *
Presumably not the road in Newbury where the dairy is!
see:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/565364/Mi...echnology-Wi-Fi
That article is getting on for two years ago.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blackdog
post Dec 1 2016, 12:40 AM
Post #168


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,945
Joined: 5-June 09
Member No.: 130



QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 30 2016, 07:22 PM) *
That article is getting on for two years ago.


But interesting nonetheless - I don't suppose the concept of an expressway has changed much in two years.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gel
post Dec 5 2016, 03:07 PM
Post #169


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 948
Joined: 11-September 09
From: Thames Valley
Member No.: 337



Driving Standards The Issue:

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/14946246....ref=mr&lp=3
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Dec 5 2016, 06:26 PM
Post #170


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



Sgt Chris Appleby, I couldn't agree with you more.
Went up to Birmingham last Friday via "dangerous" A34.
Queue of traffic in outside lane behind slow overtaking juggernaut.
Another one pulls up alongside me on the inside and then starts to indicate right as his lane was then blocked.
Panic but what could I do so I stood my ground and he dropped back and then pulled over behind me.
This obviously p'd him off because he then spent an nerve racking 3 minutes or so about 1 metre behind me at about 60mph until the lane cleared ahead and I could pull away.
Dangerous road?
Dangerous twats more like!! angry.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Dec 5 2016, 08:28 PM
Post #171


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Dec 5 2016, 06:26 PM) *
Sgt Chris Appleby, I couldn't agree with you more.
Went up to Birmingham last Friday via "dangerous" A34.
Queue of traffic in outside lane behind slow overtaking juggernaut.
Another one pulls up alongside me on the inside and then starts to indicate right as his lane was then blocked.
Panic but what could I do so I stood my ground and he dropped back and then pulled over behind me.
This obviously p'd him off because he then spent an nerve racking 3 minutes or so about 1 metre behind me at about 60mph until the lane cleared ahead and I could pull away.
Dangerous road?
Dangerous twats more like!! angry.gif

I've had similar events, including being boxed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Turin Machine
post Dec 17 2016, 07:30 PM
Post #172


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,682
Joined: 23-September 10
From: In the lower 40
Member No.: 1,104



This might be part of the answer

"Mobile phones could soon be blocked from working while cars are being driven to deter people from using them at the wheel.
Almost one in three motorists admitted they have used their phone while driving and 17,500 people were taken to court last year.
The Department for Transport will have an 'exploratory meeting' with mobile phone companies and network providers early next year to discuss the new technology. "

If it's true, and if it works, great!!



--------------------
Gammon. And proud!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Dec 17 2016, 07:52 PM
Post #173


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (Turin Machine @ Dec 17 2016, 07:30 PM) *
This might be part of the answer

"Mobile phones could soon be blocked from working while cars are being driven to deter people from using them at the wheel.
Almost one in three motorists admitted they have used their phone while driving and 17,500 people were taken to court last year.
The Department for Transport will have an 'exploratory meeting' with mobile phone companies and network providers early next year to discuss the new technology. "

If it's true, and if it works, great!!

Once again the few spoiling it for the many who have proper in-built hands-free equipment.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Dec 17 2016, 08:10 PM
Post #174


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



Interesting development. The safety people have never been convinced that hands free makes much of a difference, apparently it was only left out of the banning legislation because the Police felt it would be too difficult to enforce. A technical solution to what is an endemic major issue can't be a bad thing.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Turin Machine
post Dec 17 2016, 08:28 PM
Post #175


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,682
Joined: 23-September 10
From: In the lower 40
Member No.: 1,104



Now, if they can now come up with a software solution that stops mums from turning around to talk to the kids on the back seat it would be a start!


--------------------
Gammon. And proud!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Dec 17 2016, 09:18 PM
Post #176


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Turin Machine @ Dec 17 2016, 08:28 PM) *
Now, if they can now come up with a software solution that stops mums from turning around to talk to the kids on the back seat it would be a start!


Your wish is our command.....driverless vehicles are in production test right now.

Personally, I'd say that's the ideal solution and I can't wait!


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Turin Machine
post Dec 18 2016, 12:30 AM
Post #177


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,682
Joined: 23-September 10
From: In the lower 40
Member No.: 1,104



You may have to, it will require amended law sets. Plus while semi autonomous cars have been here for a while there are certain problems.


--------------------
Gammon. And proud!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Dec 18 2016, 06:49 AM
Post #178


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Turin Machine @ Dec 18 2016, 12:30 AM) *
You may have to, it will require amended law sets. Plus while semi autonomous cars have been here for a while there are certain problems.


True of every innovation; bring it on!


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Dec 18 2016, 12:03 PM
Post #179


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (On the edge @ Dec 17 2016, 08:10 PM) *
Interesting development. The safety people have never been convinced that hands free makes much of a difference, apparently it was only left out of the banning legislation because the Police felt it would be too difficult to enforce. A technical solution to what is an endemic major issue can't be a bad thing.

Is there much difference between using a hands free phone and listening to Radio 4 where you have to think about what's being said, or talking to a passenger? Incidentally, I prefer silence when I'm driving on my own and rarely have the radio on.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Dec 18 2016, 05:14 PM
Post #180


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (JeffG @ Dec 18 2016, 12:03 PM) *
Is there much difference between using a hands free phone and listening to Radio 4 where you have to think about what's being said, or talking to a passenger? Incidentally, I prefer silence when I'm driving on my own and rarely have the radio on.


Not at all sure, but certainly the safety tyros and Police claim it is. A couple of firms I deal with have 'banned' hands free in their vehicles. It's probably me, but I'd much rather be doing something else than having to look at the angry expressions and gestures from other drivers when you make some breach of the traffic code. One the other day was so bad, he almost made drop my hot pasty.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

12 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 11 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 11:37 AM