Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Newbury News
NTC CEO |
|
|
|
Jun 30 2015, 09:14 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (Strafin @ Jun 30 2015, 07:12 PM) Funny how the forums hero RUP didn't mention this.... I would have thought that as it's an ongoing case and (if British justice still exists) RUP should be a key witness, therefore can't comment at the moment.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 1 2015, 07:53 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011
|
QUOTE (gel @ Jun 30 2015, 10:32 AM) If he wins a settlement, Newbury's taxpayers will be stumping up yet more £cash£. This is an interesting case from Kent.The significant points are that - Clerk resigns, alleging bullying as the cause, claiming constructive unfair dismissal
- Clerk wins £80,000
- Judge finds that actually she wasn't bullied
- But finds that the Council's handling of her grievance was inept
So even though the Clerk wasn't actually bullied she won her case because the Council mis-managed her complaint. It's notable that RUP wasn't called by either side to account for what is alleged to have happened so I'm guessing that both sides felt that they would serve their interests best by not allowing RUP to refute their version of events. In the Kent case the Council says the majority of that £80,000 payout will come from their insurers - so it's a reasonable question to ask whether or not NTC has made a claim on its insurers.
--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 2 2015, 10:08 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 810
Joined: 13-August 09
Member No.: 271
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Jul 1 2015, 08:24 AM) I suppose going to a tribunal is just in the gift of the resigned CEO. So whatever the logic of doing so, as its not going to cost him, Not quite, claimants now have to pay to bring a case. Although I guess this is waived if the claimant wins. This was started to stop frivolous/specious cases being raised at considerable cost for the defendant with no redress is the case was thrown out
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 2 2015, 10:14 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (Berkshirelad @ Jul 2 2015, 11:08 AM) Not quite, claimants now have to pay to bring a case.
Although I guess this is waived if the claimant wins.
This was started to stop frivolous/specious cases being raised at considerable cost for the defendant with no redress is the case was thrown out Perhaps I should have worded that better. The fees are pretty minimal - particularly in something like this. I don't think the looser pays the other side's costs either. So, the cost is next to nothing; odds still better than a few quid at Ladbrookes.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 3 2015, 01:33 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212
|
QUOTE (Exhausted @ Jul 2 2015, 10:12 PM) I don't know where making demands on well paid staff and giving them a hard time if they fail to meet standards that would be expected of them becomes bullying. I believe that we have become too soft in our approach to management of staff if we allow a person to fail so badly in their work that they cost the company financial losses due to their ineptness without some serious discipline. However the problem with parish councils, as we have seen around our own area, not only Newbury, is that the whole management system is run by amateurs who have little experience or else see themselves as country squires. In this particular case and I can only judge by the information that has come to light, The leader of the council has not applied the appropriate discipline to a paid employee and has then allowed one of his council members to take up the case and who, possibly, went a bit over the top. RUP comes from a disciplined work ethic not dissimilar to that which would be applied in HM Forces and when he realised that the whole episode had been swept under the carpet it was perhaps outside his work ethic to accept what he saw as mismanagement. We can only wait to see what the tribunal think and trust that the legal expenses paid out by the NTC save us from a massive payout. Come on do keep up you know full well the standard operating procedure? A Town Councillor opens their mouth, burps or *arts and it costs us precept payers a wedge! I do wish you would not denigrate amateurs by stating they are as inept as our Town Councillors!
--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 28 2015, 11:35 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 390
Joined: 26-August 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 303
|
QUOTE (Exhausted @ Jul 3 2015, 06:54 PM) Yes, a bit remiss of me, a pity that a couple of key witnesses were not called, RUP and perhaps Simon to put the boot on the other foot so to speak. Which side would have called me as I image that neither would wish me to speak? There is the dilemma! Apparently I have to sit back and have exceptionally negative things said about me without any opportunity for redress! When will the people of Newbury demand to know what has happened? Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera Liberal Democrat Activist and former 'Whistle Blowing Councillor'
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|