IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Will You Be Giving Your Child The Swine Flu Jab ?, Proven to cause immunotoxicity, neurotoxicity, sterility and cancer
Jason_Tame
post Nov 30 2009, 04:22 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 29-September 09
Member No.: 373



Every Physician, Nurse or medical personnel who administers the H1N1 vaccine (or any vaccine) should be asking themselves why they are injecting the following ingredients into patients that have been scientifically proven to cause immunotoxicity, neurotoxicity, sterility and cancer.......

Novartis Focetria Adjuvanted H1N1
Influenza Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Polysorbate 80: Sterilie Agent
Potassium Chloride: Neurotoxin
Squalene: Neurotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

Novartis H1N1 Monovalent Influenza Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Beta-Propiolactone: Carcinogen
Polymyxin: Neurotoxin
Neomycin: Immunotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

GlaxoSmithKline Arepanrix Adjuvanted
H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Formaldehyde : Carcinogen
Polysorbate 80: Sterilie Agent
Sodium Deoxycholate: Immunotoxin
Squalene: Neurotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

GlaxoSmithKline Pandemrix Adjuvanted
H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Octoxynol 10: Immunotoxin
Polysorbate 80: Sterilie Agent
Potassium Chloride: Neurotoxin
Sodium Deoxycholate: Immunotoxin
Squalene: Neurotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

GlaxoSmithKline Fluarix 2009-2010
Formula Ingredients/Toxicity
Formaldehyde : Carcinogen
Octoxynol 10: Immunotoxin
Polysorbate 80: Sterilie Agent
Sodium Deoxycholate: Immunotoxin

Sanofi-Pasteur H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Formaldehyde : Carcinogen
Polyethylene Glycol: Systemic Toxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

MedImmune H1N1 Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Monosodium Glutamate: Neurotoxin
Gentamicin Sulfate: Nephrotoxic
Monobasic Potassium Phosphate: Immunotoxin

FLUARIX 2009 Latest Package Insert Ingredients/Toxicity
Formaldehyde : Carcinogen
Gentamicin Sulfate: Nephrotoxic
Polysorbate 80: Sterilie Agent
Sodium Deoxycholate: Immunotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

CSL PANVAX H1N1 Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Beta-Propiolactone: Carcinogen
Neomycin: Immunotoxin
Sodium Taurodeoxycholate: Carcinogen/Immunotoxin
Polymyxin: Neurotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

CSL Afluria H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Beta-Propiolactone: Carcinogen
Neomycin Sulfate: Immunotoxin
Polymyxin B: Neurotoxin
Potassium Chloride: Neurotoxin
Sodium Taurodeoxycholate: Carcinogen/Immunotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin


Serious adverse reactions are as follows:

* Pain

* Redness

* Swelling

* Fatigue

* Headaches

* Arthralgia (joint inflammation)

* Myalgia (muscle inflammation)

* Shivering

* Sweating

* Swollen lymph nodes

* Fever

* Vomiting

* Tingling or numbness of the hands or feet

* Shortness of breath

* Vasculitis (inflammation of the blood vessels)

Serious adverse reactions are as follows:

* Blood and lymphatic system disorders (lymphadenopathy)

* Psychiatric disorders (insomnia)

* Nervous system disorders (dizziness, paraesthesia, inflammation of the central nervous system, inflammation of nerves, autoimmune disorders affecting myelin sheaths of nerves such as Guillain-Barré Syndrome)

* Ear and labyrinth disorders (vertigo)

* Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (dyspnoea)

* Gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting, dyspepsia, stomach discomfort)

* Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (pruritus, rash)

* Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (back pain, musculoskeletal stiffness, neck pain, muscle spasms, pain in extremity)

* General disorders and administration site conditions (bruising, asthenia, chest pain, malaise)

http://preventdisease.com/news/09/103009_v...otoxicity.shtml
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Bill1_*
post Nov 30 2009, 04:57 PM
Post #2





Guests






Twice?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TallDarkAndHands...
post Nov 30 2009, 05:00 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,032
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60



Nothing like a good bit of Scaremongering. wink.gif

We are all doomed! Doomed I tells ya.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason_Tame
post Nov 30 2009, 05:03 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 29-September 09
Member No.: 373



I'm just letting you all know what is inside the Vaccine. Sorry about the double post, I don't know what happened smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rose8
post Nov 30 2009, 05:07 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 104



I understand whats trying to be said here. But taking almost any medication gives a risk of all 'POSSIBLE' side effects. Each person has to weigh up the pro's and con's and decide for themselves. I dont have VERY YOUNG children, so i wouldn't be giving this to my children. I also don't come under any 'at risk' category ie asthmatic / pregnant etc so i wouldnt be offered it. I would rather 'ride the storm' and hopefully get over it. But thats just me :-)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason_Tame
post Nov 30 2009, 05:12 PM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 29-September 09
Member No.: 373



The MedImmune H1N1 Vaccine has Monosodium Glutamate inside it ?

MSG ?

Nobody cares, No one cares whats inside the Vaccines smile.gif

Even if it had Mercury inside, people still would not Care smile.gif ............................................................Thimerosal smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rose8
post Nov 30 2009, 05:16 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 104



Its scary what they put into these drugs and then what we will possibly (if we chose to take it) then put in our bodies. Women have been taking the pill for years now, they have reduced certain chemicals in them as the years have gone on, but my worry is, no-one knows the long term future effects and again, this is the same for any drugs. And again, one to be decided by the individual. I do think we all need to know the advantages / dis-advantages etc of anything that we take. Its a hard decision.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeven
post Nov 30 2009, 07:57 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 19-November 09
Member No.: 498



Most drugs are as bad as this sadly. Still, I wouldn't want it, or recommend it unless the person was considered at risk through job, age, health conditions etc
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chesapeake
post Dec 1 2009, 09:00 AM
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 274
Joined: 19-July 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 205



I am considered at risk, so I have just had the Flu jab and the Swine Flu jab, one in each arm. I had no side effects apart from a slight bruised feeling in one arm for a day. I would rather that than risk leaving my children without a mother. My son is still very young, under five and so should also have the swine flu jab but they are not rolling out the jab to under fives untill January. He will be having it as he suffers from asthma. Again I would rather do everything in my power to keep him safe than risk him becoming one of the statistical dead. Thousands of people have died.

If we look at all the ingredients in everything we use (shampoos, soaps, clothes etc.etc.) we would go back to living like cavemen. We wouldn't drive cars, we wouldn't read/use newspapers, we wouldn't have home insulation, duvets, sofas, beds. I could go on and on as nearly everything has man made chemicals in it. In the main the world is a better place and we nearly all enjoy the benefits of this progress. I wonder if the original poster can honestly claim that he doesn't also enjoy these benefits?

This sort of scare-mongering makes me cross! It does more damage than good!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Dec 1 2009, 10:48 AM
Post #10


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (Chesapeake @ Dec 1 2009, 09:00 AM) *
This sort of scare-mongering makes me cross! It does more damage than good!

Hear, hear. It smacks of the MMR thing - kids getting measles which can be life-threatening because parents were scared off the vaccine by bad science.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Dec 1 2009, 11:07 AM
Post #11


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (JeffG @ Dec 1 2009, 10:48 AM) *
Hear, hear. It smacks of the MMR thing - kids getting measles which can be life-threatening because parents were scared off the vaccine by bad science.

True, but when the PM won't own up to using it (for his children) then some people might smell something fishy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Dec 1 2009, 11:34 AM
Post #12


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (Iommi @ Dec 1 2009, 11:07 AM) *
True, but when the PM won't own up to using it (for his children) then some people might smell something fishy.

Private family decisions like that should be kept private and not in the public domain. They are nothing to do with politics. Otherwise you get the ridiculous thing with John Gummer feeding beefburgers to his daughter. He was ridiculed for that, so damned if you do and damned if you don't.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Dec 1 2009, 12:38 PM
Post #13


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (JeffG @ Dec 1 2009, 11:34 AM) *
Private family decisions like that should be kept private and not in the public domain. They are nothing to do with politics. Otherwise you get the ridiculous thing with John Gummer feeding beefburgers to his daughter. He was ridiculed for that, so damned if you do and damned if you don't.

I think they have everything to do with politics. At least Gummer stood by the strength of his convictions, but Mr Blair didn't. I can't see what is so sensitive to state whether one used an MMR or not, it is not like one's medical condition is being publicised. Mr Blair could have stood up and said, it is safe, my children have had it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sarah
post Dec 1 2009, 01:47 PM
Post #14


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 12-July 09
Member No.: 191



QUOTE (JeffG @ Dec 1 2009, 10:48 AM) *
Hear, hear. It smacks of the MMR thing - kids getting measles which can be life-threatening because parents were scared off the vaccine by bad science.


I think you'll find that many of the parents who were concerned about the MMR vaccine, went to great lengths to check out all available information, including the opinions of doctors both for and against.

Many of those who opted out went on and paid for their children to have single vaccines.

I don't think it's unreasonable for parents to be concerned and it's quite understandable that they don't want to go ahead with anything that might harm their child, nor is it unreasonable to expect the PM to show how much he actually believes/supports his government's advice, by saying whether or not he had agreed to his children having the vaccine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy
post Dec 1 2009, 02:04 PM
Post #15


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 318
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 26



QUOTE (Iommi @ Dec 1 2009, 12:38 PM) *
I think they have everything to do with politics. At least Gummer stood by the strength of his convictions, but Mr Blair didn't. I can't see what is so sensitive to state whether one used an MMR or not, it is not like one's medical condition is being publicised. Mr Blair could have stood up and said, it is safe, my children have had it.


Don't agree at all. His choice should not influence anybody else in their decision and that's exactly why it's a sensitive issue.

What Blair or any other public, or private for that matter, individual does with private health decisions is theirs and theirs alone and should have no bearing or influence on anybody else.

If, for example, he openly stated his children did not have the jab and you followed suit with yours, then your child died of measles. Is then Blair's fault? No, but you'd blame him!!! I for one am more than capable of making my own informed decisions on these matters.

And that is also exactly why this OP is dangerous and I personally think should be removed.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason_Tame
post Dec 1 2009, 02:07 PM
Post #16


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 29-September 09
Member No.: 373



Doctors I know, don't take Vaccines smile.gif and neither do there children smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Dec 1 2009, 02:38 PM
Post #17


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (Andy @ Dec 1 2009, 02:04 PM) *
Don't agree at all. His choice should not influence anybody else in their decision and that's exactly why it's a sensitive issue.

His government said it was safe and good. If he chooses to have the vaccines any other way, then he is possibly showing concern about the veracity of his government policy.

QUOTE (Andy @ Dec 1 2009, 02:04 PM) *
What Blair or any other public, or private for that matter, individual does with private health decisions is theirs and theirs alone and should have no bearing or influence on anybody else.

If that were the case, then we wouldn't have celebrities encouraging people to improve their health and wellbeing (think Pele).

QUOTE (Andy @ Dec 1 2009, 02:04 PM) *
If, for example, he openly stated his children did not have the jab and you followed suit with yours, then your child died of measles. Is then Blair's fault? No, but you'd blame him!!! I for one am more than capable of making my own informed decisions on these matters.

Of course I wouldn't blame him, this isn't the issue, the issue is of MMR or individually, or not. If he says it is safe, but blowed if I'm going to do it, what message does that send?

QUOTE (Andy @ Dec 1 2009, 02:04 PM) *
And that is also exactly why this OP is dangerous and I personally think should be removed.

People should take advice of their Doctor and not of politicians or websites.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chesapeake
post Dec 1 2009, 02:39 PM
Post #18


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 274
Joined: 19-July 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 205



QUOTE (Jason_Tame @ Dec 1 2009, 02:07 PM) *
Doctors I know, don't take Vaccines smile.gif and neither do there children smile.gif


How could we honestly believe the rantings of someone who doesn't even know the difference between "there" and "their".

Your comments are far too generalistic. You may very well know this about a doctor or two but what sort of "doctor"? Don't put all doctors into the same group, they're all individuals with a right to their own opinions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason_Tame
post Dec 1 2009, 02:54 PM
Post #19


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 29-September 09
Member No.: 373



QUOTE (Chesapeake @ Dec 1 2009, 03:39 PM) *
How could we honestly believe the rantings of someone who doesn't even know the difference between "there" and "their".

Your comments are far too generalistic. You may very well know this about a doctor or two but what sort of "doctor"? Don't put all doctors into the same group, they're all individuals with a right to their own opinions.


Wow Chesapeake, I wish I was you!

So I can correct everyone on there bad English, and make myself look really cool.

O hang on............

Their bad English!

ahehe I just posted the ingredients of the Vaccines, don't believe me, go find out for yourself.

whilst you are at it can you spell check for me again ? cheers
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy
post Dec 1 2009, 03:01 PM
Post #20


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 318
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 26



QUOTE (Iommi @ Dec 1 2009, 02:38 PM) *
His government said it was safe and good. If he chooses to have the vaccines any other way, then he is possibly showing concern about the veracity of his government policy.

The government just pass on the advice from the medical profession and then roll it out as they are best placed to run the logistics of that roll out. They state it is safe, because that is the medical advice, they do not force anyone or everyone to have it.

QUOTE (Iommi @ Dec 1 2009, 02:38 PM) *
If that were the case, then we wouldn't have celebrities encouraging people to improve their health and well being, think Pele.

Hardly the same..Erection problems and a potential life saving vaccine. Plus, I'm sure Pfizer reimburse him hansomly for his time.

QUOTE (Iommi @ Dec 1 2009, 02:38 PM) *
Of course I wouldn't blame him, this isn't the issue, the issue is of MMR or individually, or not. If he says it is safe, but blowed if I'm going to do it, what message does that send?

But others just might, which is exactly why an individuals choice should influence others unless a medical professional.

QUOTE (Iommi @ Dec 1 2009, 02:38 PM) *
People should take advice of their Doctor and not of politicians or websites.

Doesn't this just contradict what you've been arguing for? That's exactly what I've stated from the beginning.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th December 2019 - 05:07 AM