IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Cracks start to show in Victoria Park story, Media blamed for extracting too many stories from town park
Iommi
post Nov 8 2010, 05:42 PM
Post #21


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



So why are they dewatering when it is meant to have been switched off?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post Nov 8 2010, 07:08 PM
Post #22


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Iommi @ Nov 8 2010, 05:42 PM) *
So why are they dewatering when it is meant to have been switched off?
Where did you read they were meant to have finished dewatering?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HJD
post Nov 8 2010, 07:45 PM
Post #23


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 420
Joined: 5-September 09
Member No.: 322



QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 8 2010, 07:08 PM) *
Where did you read they were meant to have finished dewatering?


http://newburytoday.co.uk/News/Article.aspx?articleID=15019

Costain have told the media that pumping has stopped.

Wake up at the back laugh.gif.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post Nov 8 2010, 08:10 PM
Post #24


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (HJD @ Nov 8 2010, 07:45 PM) *


http://newburytoday.co.uk/News/Article.aspx?articleID=15019

Costain have told the media that pumping has stopped.

Wake up at the back laugh.gif.
It doesn't say that in the article you posted.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Nov 8 2010, 08:22 PM
Post #25


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 8 2010, 07:08 PM) *
Where did you read they were meant to have finished dewatering?

From the article above it says:"The underground work which necessitated the water being abstracted has now finished and the pipes have been shut off. "
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post Nov 8 2010, 08:27 PM
Post #26


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Iommi @ Nov 8 2010, 08:22 PM) *
From the article aboce it says:"The underground work which necessitated the water being abstracted has now finished and the pipes have been shut off. "
But they haven't have they, so it looks like the NWN have got it wrong.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Nov 8 2010, 08:30 PM
Post #27


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 8 2010, 08:27 PM) *
But they haven't, have they, so it looks like the NWN have got it wrong.

Which is why I asked the question, but it seems strange that they would continue to dewater if the work that necessitated it has been finished.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post Nov 8 2010, 08:34 PM
Post #28


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Iommi @ Nov 8 2010, 08:30 PM) *
Which is why I asked the question, but it seems strange that they would continue to dewater if the work that necessitated it has been finished.
I haven't seen it reported that this work has finished, where did you see it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Nov 8 2010, 08:36 PM
Post #29


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 8 2010, 08:34 PM) *
I haven't seen it reported that this work has finished, where did you see it?

From the article above it says:"The underground work which necessitated the water being abstracted has now finished and the pipes have been shut off. "
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post Nov 8 2010, 08:44 PM
Post #30


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Iommi @ Nov 8 2010, 08:36 PM) *
From the article above it says:"The underground work which necessitated the water being abstracted has now finished and the pipes have been shut off. "
Again no source. Basically the NWN just made it up didn't they, which goes back to what the original poster was saying. laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Nov 8 2010, 08:50 PM
Post #31


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 8 2010, 08:44 PM) *
Again no source. Basically the NWN just made it up, didn't they which goes back to what the original poster was saying. laugh.gif

They might have made it up, but they could have been lied to. Perhaps Cllr Allen could clear this up; to some here it looks suspicious.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Richard Garvie
post Nov 8 2010, 08:53 PM
Post #32


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,974
Joined: 8-September 10
Member No.: 1,076



"The underground work which necessitated the water being abstracted has now finished and the pipes have been shut off."

- Quote from Newbury News
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post Nov 8 2010, 08:53 PM
Post #33


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Iommi @ Nov 8 2010, 08:50 PM) *
They might have made it up, but they could have been lied to. Perhaps Mr Allen could clear this up, as to some here it looks suspicious.
I'd go with the former as there's no source credited to the statements.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Nov 8 2010, 08:54 PM
Post #34


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (Richard Garvie @ Nov 8 2010, 08:53 PM) *
"The underground work which necessitated the water being abstracted has now finished and the pipes have been shut off."

- Quote from Newbury News

ER, yes...we've already been down this one! wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Nov 8 2010, 08:55 PM
Post #35


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (user23 @ Nov 8 2010, 08:53 PM) *
I'd go with the former as there's no source credited to the statements.

You may speculate, but I have read it in good faith and it seems a strange thing to report. BTW - the dewatering was scheduled to finish in November.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post Nov 8 2010, 09:06 PM
Post #36


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Iommi @ Nov 8 2010, 08:55 PM) *
You may speculate, but I have read it in good faith and it seems a strange thing to report. BTW - the dewatering was scheduled to finish in November.
Perhaps they should have sent someone down to check given the whole thing seems to be behind schedule.

It is after all, five minutes walk from their HQ.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
David Allen
post Nov 8 2010, 10:56 PM
Post #37


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 34
Joined: 20-December 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 571



QUOTE (Iommi @ Nov 8 2010, 08:50 PM) *
They might have made it up, but they could have been lied to. Perhaps Cllr Allen could clear this up; to some here it looks suspicious.


Anything to oblige. The water pumping cannot simply be shut off; it needs to be gradually shut-down in an orderly fashion. Althought I agree the conflicting news and reports are a bit frustrating.

I've asked for an update from Costain tomorrow (9/11) and I'll post any reply I get.

Regards
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Nov 8 2010, 11:20 PM
Post #38


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (David Allen @ Nov 8 2010, 10:56 PM) *
Anything to oblige. The water pumping cannot simply be shut off; it needs to be gradually shut-down in an orderly fashion. Althought I agree the conflicting news and reports are a bit frustrating. I've asked for an update from Costain tomorrow (9/11) and I'll post any reply I get. Regards


Thank you Cllr Allen, a voice of calm in a sea of chaos! biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bofem
post Nov 9 2010, 11:56 AM
Post #39


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 485
Joined: 28-May 10
From: Newbury
Member No.: 924



Hey User. Do you still rent out your house in Park Terrace? Maybe you are in a better position to update us all.


--------------------
Newbury's #1 ill-informed internet poster
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post Nov 9 2010, 01:11 PM
Post #40


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



I have some questions the Council might like to answer:

Does the Council not insure against damage to the park's walls and buildings?
Does NTC have a repairing obligation to all of the affected buildings - even the toilet block?
Do any of the Friends of Victoria Park own property affected by the supposed subsidance?
Is the damage to the walls and buildings not a result of tree root damage and collapse after felling?
Couldn't you just have repaired the football pitches with a couple of dumpy bags of topsoil?
How much exactly is the survey costing?
Why is the survey delayed?


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 02:16 AM