Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Random Rants
|
|
NWN and the English language |
|
|
|
Dec 5 2012, 03:08 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56
|
QUOTE (CBW137Y @ Dec 5 2012, 12:09 PM) The one thing which annoys me whilst trying to read some of the online reports is the lack of understanding what a paragraph is! It rather distracts from the lack of ability to spell somewhat. One hope there is some training on offer to brush up there English skills. QUOTE (CBW137Y @ Dec 5 2012, 12:10 PM) Of course, I am now waiting for the person for whom the penny doesn't drop to reply Ah, you mean the four errors in your post were deliberate? Nearly caught me there!
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 5 2012, 08:39 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,605
Joined: 25-November 09
Member No.: 511
|
QUOTE (CBW137Y @ Dec 5 2012, 04:32 PM) In all seriousness though, I really don't understand the need for single line spacing. Have the reporters never heard of paragraphs? The whole site is a mess. Why no dates on 'related posts'? Who is interested in stuff three years old for example. Another simple mistake now. 'AN eighty-four man was left with life threatening injuries after being hit by a car in Cold Ash on Friday. '
--------------------
There their, loose loser!
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 5 2012, 08:45 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (x2lls @ Dec 5 2012, 08:39 PM) The whole site is a mess. Why no dates on 'related posts'? Who is interested in stuff three years old for example. While I think a date is a good idea, I do sometimes like to (re)familiarise myself with old stories.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 01:09 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 300
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 48
|
A POLICE pursuit through a quite West Berkshire village last night (Weds) ended with four men being placed in police custody. Quite what is the question. Quite noisy could be an answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 01:35 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392
|
QUOTE (James_Trinder @ Dec 13 2012, 01:09 PM) A POLICE pursuit through a quite West Berkshire village last night (Weds) ended with four men being placed in police custody. Quite what is the question. Quite noisy could be an answer. Could have been worse, could have " custardy" that would have meant they had met a sticky end.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 02:12 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,970
Joined: 29-December 09
From: Dogging in a car park somewhere
Member No.: 592
|
QUOTE (Penelope @ Dec 13 2012, 01:35 PM) Could have been worse, could have " custardy" that would have meant they had met a sticky end. Haha
--------------------
:p Grammar: the difference between knowing your poop and knowing you're poop.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 05:04 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,722
Joined: 4-September 09
Member No.: 320
|
QUOTE (Baffers100 @ Dec 13 2012, 04:32 PM) I made the mistake of sending a shirty mail to the "Chief reporter" flagging up his rubbish English in an article. He responded the same day, flagging up the one error in my email. (Admitedly, given the nature of the email I should have double-checked!).
That said, I found it rather frustrating that he found the time to send a terse email, but did not actually change the published article. Spelling mistakes and grammatical errors are forgiveable, but this site totally lacks any attention to detail. I doubt half of the articles on here are proof-read. It makes me wonder why these people bother being in this profession if they can only be arsed to to do half a job? Can't really see the importance. Did you understand the text was it ambiguous because of the grammatical error. Probably not so what's the big deal. Admitedly.....Admittedly We have too many people whinging about the odd mistake but some of the posts on here beggar belief sometimes. But, usually they make sense (Except dear old "Nothing Much") so why stress about it, especially feeling the need to send an email. Sad really.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 05:24 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 187
Joined: 13-March 12
Member No.: 8,653
|
QUOTE (Exhausted @ Dec 13 2012, 05:04 PM) Can't really see the importance. Did you understand the text was it ambiguous because of the grammatical error. Probably not so what's the big deal.
Admitedly.....Admittedly
We have too many people whinging about the odd mistake but some of the posts on here beggar belief sometimes. But, usually they make sense (Except dear old "Nothing Much") so why stress about it, especially feeling the need to send an email. Sad really. I knew I would get called up on something (but won't comment too much about the capital E you used at the start of the parenthesis!) I hear your point, but I don't make a living out of my writing- and I doubt the vast majority on here do. If I did, I would not feel quite so relaxed making the errors in published, paid for work, as I do on a local 'news' forum. If you witness a 'professional' driver driving dangerously, do you turn a blind eye? Maybe some do, but I don't. I really don't see why poor quality work should be tolerated. There are plenty of other people who would take their jobs and use the spell-check function. The importance, was that the article was rather close to home as it was about a young teenager who lost his life in a glider accident. It is because of the picture that I clicked on the article. I understood it perfectly, but found the lack of proof-reading not only lazy, but also disrespectful. They even spelt the name of his school wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 05:50 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (Baffers100 @ Dec 13 2012, 05:24 PM) I hear your point, but I don't make a living out of my writing..... Actually, NWN doesn't either; its main income comes from selling advertising.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 06:58 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (Baffers100 @ Dec 13 2012, 05:24 PM) The importance, was that the article was rather close to home as it was about a young teenager who lost his life in a glider accident. It is because of the picture that I clicked on the article. I understood it perfectly, but found the lack of proof-reading not only lazy, but also disrespectful. They even spelt the name of his school wrong. I agree; in the wrong place it can look disrespectful. As an example, I'm reminded of Gordon Brown's letter to a bereaved parent.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 08:00 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 180
Joined: 4-September 12
Member No.: 8,832
|
QUOTE (blackdog @ Nov 12 2012, 10:03 AM) A thread to let of a little steam about bad English in the NWN or NewburyToday.
Here is the first - a headline on NewburyToday today:
Walrus, horseshoe, handlebars? Gentleman opt for the musketeer moustache for Movember
Gentlemen opt, a gentleman opts. Hopefully just a typo ... This is not just the NWN but endemic throughout the newspaper industry. Standards have decline over the last 30 years. In fact the whole Newspaper industry has declined.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 09:29 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Dec 13 2012, 07:28 PM) On the Brown affair, I must admit to wondering who had the worst manners. I don't think it is a matter of manners. more courtesy - at least get the name right. The point is, it looks rushed, and therefore careless.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 09:40 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Dec 13 2012, 09:29 PM) I don't think it is a matter of manners. more courtesy - at least get the name right. The point is, it looks rushed, and therefore careless. And should never have been made public; that's where manners come in.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 User(s) are reading this topic (5 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|