IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

15 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What do the LibDems actjually stand for?, Is it simply power at any cost?
Richard Garvie
post Oct 22 2012, 08:31 AM
Post #41


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,974
Joined: 8-September 10
Member No.: 1,076



He claims he was asked to not stand candidates in labour target wards. What actually was suggested is that labour didn't stand candidates against people like the greens and independents so we weren't competing in the same wards. There are forum posts on this subject too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adrian Hollister
post Oct 22 2012, 08:35 AM
Post #42


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613



QUOTE (Richard Garvie @ Oct 22 2012, 03:36 AM) *
Not quite true Adrian. I appoached all the independents and smaller parties to try and work together to avoid competing for same seats. I suppose you should maybe go and read the emails we exchanged at the time and correct your post.

Ok, it's worse, you suggested that you wouldn't stand in other parties key areas either.

Such is the desperation of some to force themselves on other people.

The goal of 'power' does seem to flirt immortality at all levels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adrian Hollister
post Oct 22 2012, 08:37 AM
Post #43


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613



QUOTE (GMR @ Oct 21 2012, 08:24 PM) *
Actually you should read back to what I said. I didn't say it is what I believe in but the nature of our political system. Actually I am against PR as it causes the problems that have been highlighted. Coalition is just another form of PR (created by circumstances).

I stand corrected smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NWNREADER
post Oct 22 2012, 08:58 AM
Post #44


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265



QUOTE (Richard Garvie @ Oct 22 2012, 09:31 AM) *
He claims he was asked to not stand candidates in labour target wards. What actually was suggested is that labour didn't stand candidates against people like the greens and independents so we weren't competing in the same wards. There are forum posts on this subject too.

Any 'agreement' about where to put forward candidates is corrupting.

Part of the reason for your suggestion is you had too few candidates to go round?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adrian Hollister
post Oct 22 2012, 09:08 AM
Post #45


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613



QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Oct 22 2012, 09:58 AM) *
Any 'agreement' about where to put forward candidates is corrupting.

Agree

QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Oct 22 2012, 09:58 AM) *
Part of the reason for your suggestion is you had too few candidates to go round?

That was not discussed, quite the opposite.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jo Pepper
post Oct 22 2012, 10:47 AM
Post #46


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 56
Joined: 12-March 12
Member No.: 8,652



QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Oct 22 2012, 09:58 AM) *
Any 'agreement' about where to put forward candidates is corrupting.

Are there no rules to prevent this? It sounds very dodgy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blackdog
post Oct 22 2012, 04:18 PM
Post #47


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,945
Joined: 5-June 09
Member No.: 130



QUOTE (Jo Pepper @ Oct 22 2012, 11:47 AM) *
Are there no rules to prevent this? It sounds very dodgy.

Party politics is dodgy full stop. If you think about it, the idea of like minded people agreeing not to compete for a seat is what political parties are all about.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NWNREADER
post Oct 22 2012, 06:53 PM
Post #48


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Oct 22 2012, 10:08 AM) *
That was not discussed, quite the opposite.

'Twas a question , and aimed at RG
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jo Pepper
post Oct 23 2012, 08:50 PM
Post #49


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 56
Joined: 12-March 12
Member No.: 8,652



Looks like RG has retreated, perhaps embarassed by his dodgy politics. Lib Dems seem desperate around here, so I'm sure they will be happy to take on damaged goods.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Richard Garvie
post Oct 24 2012, 01:29 PM
Post #50


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,974
Joined: 8-September 10
Member No.: 1,076



Far from it. Just been busy the last few days, and observing the posts.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ruwan Uduwerage-...
post Oct 24 2012, 01:53 PM
Post #51


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 390
Joined: 26-August 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 303



QUOTE
Lib Dems seem desperate around here


What would make anyone think this?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cognosco
post Oct 24 2012, 06:21 PM
Post #52


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



QUOTE (Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera @ Oct 24 2012, 02:53 PM) *
What would make anyone think this?


Not only round here but nationally - by getting into bed with the Conservatives and enabling the decimation of our NHS and reneging on most of their manifesto policies I would like to think they will be decimated in any future elections.
The only problem is the average voter has no other party to vote for. All politicians are now held in such low esteem I seriously worry for our future unless there is a rapid change of thinking on the political front.


--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Oct 24 2012, 07:44 PM
Post #53


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Ruwan Uduwerage-Perera @ Oct 24 2012, 02:53 PM) *
What would make anyone think this?


Err last week's NWN - apparently in discussion with arch socialist Richard G to change his spots and stand in their interest at next general election?

Dave R saying he's stepping down as candidate because he couldn't stand for both Council and Parliament. Presumably, couldn't be spared from Council if by some miracle he was elected MP again. So little talent locally he can't be spared then!

In a bit of a pickle aren't they, no satisfactory parliamentary candidate and no adequate succession plan for Mr R, - who is now touching retirement age. Then nationally, coalition clearly ain't going well and not worth repeating. As ably demonstrated by dear old Vince making up to the young Milliband.

Yesterday's party!


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Oct 27 2012, 06:57 PM
Post #54


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



Have just read this weeks NWN. Loved the whitewash! Apparently there wasn't a plot to unseat Dave - everyone had that wrong. Plot? what plot - no one had mentioned a plot up 'till now. Anyway, they couldn't have made Richard G the candidate because its against the rules. So that's all right then. Such nice people - Garvey is better off on his own!


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jo Pepper
post Oct 28 2012, 02:35 PM
Post #55


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 56
Joined: 12-March 12
Member No.: 8,652



Sounds like RG has been playing the politics and is desperate for attention. First off corruption putting forward candidates and trying to rig an election and now he looks like he involved flirting with another political party.

Who know's what on earth he is standing for or about (oh hang on - it's all about himself and raw power).

Labour in West Berks is a tiny party but they all must be very embarrased. This is the sort of dodgy stuff that gives politics a bad name.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spider
post Oct 28 2012, 04:57 PM
Post #56


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 180
Joined: 4-September 12
Member No.: 8,832



I have thought about voting Lib Dem's but I am not too sure now. Living in Newbury you've only got the Lib Dems and the Tories.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Oct 28 2012, 05:25 PM
Post #57


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Jo Pepper @ Oct 28 2012, 03:35 PM) *
Sounds like RG has been playing the politics and is desperate for attention. First off corruption putting forward candidates and trying to rig an election and now he looks like he involved flirting with another political party.

Who know's what on earth he is standing for or about (oh hang on - it's all about himself and raw power).

Labour in West Berks is a tiny party but they all must be very embarrased. This is the sort of dodgy stuff that gives politics a bad name.


The press reports suggest it was the LibDems who made the overtures in the first place. Granted, they may have the story wrong. That he didn't play and made it all public does seem to have embarrassed the loveable LibDems and their erstwhile MP!

Dodgy politics, interesting one that, they often forget some of us have very long memories.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cognosco
post Oct 28 2012, 05:27 PM
Post #58


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



QUOTE (Spider @ Oct 28 2012, 04:57 PM) *
I have thought about voting Lib Dem's but I am not too sure now. Living in Newbury you've only got the Lib Dems and the Tories.


Exactly! As I have stated before people only vote to keep the worst one out of power not because they want the other one necessarily?

It's a case of do you want to be shafted by A or B really! rolleyes.gif


--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adrian Hollister
post Oct 28 2012, 06:30 PM
Post #59


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613



QUOTE (Spider @ Oct 28 2012, 05:57 PM) *
I have thought about voting Lib Dem's but I am not too sure now. Living in Newbury you've only got the Lib Dems and the Tories.

Don't bet on it - the Greens are as large if not larger in Berkshire than New Labour. If your fed up with the blue and yellow Tories then just vote green!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NWNREADER
post Oct 28 2012, 06:37 PM
Post #60


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Oct 28 2012, 07:30 PM) *
Don't bet on it - the Greens are as large if not larger in Berkshire than New Labour. If your fed up with the blue and yellow Tories then just vote green!


Is that a sound reason to vote for a political party?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

15 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 08:47 PM