IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

15 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What do the LibDems actjually stand for?, Is it simply power at any cost?
On the edge
post Oct 20 2012, 07:08 AM
Post #21


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Oct 19 2012, 11:06 PM) *
GMR ... I stand up an applaud your posts. Bang on. And I say this without being your biggest fan nor a devotee of the Lib Dems. If what is said is true about RG, then he is making a common sense decision taking into account of the conditions before him.


Saying all that, I will never vote for any councillor that hung Simon Kirby like the Newbury Council did. All parties.


Totally agree with your comment about Simon Kirby. That just about put the final on my view of the LibDems.

However, if its right what you say about RG - we might as well forget any political debate, forget any principles or visions, on election day, just go with the biggest gob. Locally, it would eventually mean party politics are ended and so just a society of friends run the show. I suppose that's the European way; look at Italy. One way to run a country; not sure I'd like it .


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Oct 20 2012, 09:49 AM
Post #22


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (On the edge @ Oct 20 2012, 08:08 AM) *
Totally agree with your comment about Simon Kirby. That just about put the final on my view of the LibDems.

However, if its right what you say about RG - we might as well forget any political debate, forget any principles or visions, on election day, just go with the biggest gob. Locally, it would eventually mean party politics are ended and so just a society of friends run the show. I suppose that's the European way; look at Italy. One way to run a country; not sure I'd like it .

I'm not sure that party politics has any meaning at local level. Indeed, at national level they are all very close.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Oct 20 2012, 10:24 AM
Post #23


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Oct 20 2012, 10:49 AM) *
I'm not sure that party politics has any meaning at local level. Indeed, at national level they are all very close.


Certainly that's exactly how it seems today - which is why the posturing is so time wasting and pointless. That being so, why does anyone these days stand for election? What is their motivation? Regrettably in most cases it's the personal pursuit of power - simply I know best and I want to be in charge.

The system to get you there is simply to appeal to enough voters at a point in time - so of course, I'll be whatever you want. That's it for five years, and we go round again. Truly an elected dictatorship.

At local level, its not even elected. The paid officials run the Council against criteria set by central government. No room for any other input whatsoever. In reality, we don't elect councillors, rather amateur social workers.

Sad its come to this, but not really surprising.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Oct 20 2012, 10:38 AM
Post #24


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



I totally agree. The only power they seem to have is to persecute individuals that stand up for themselves.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NWNREADER
post Oct 20 2012, 01:14 PM
Post #25


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265



QUOTE (On the edge @ Oct 20 2012, 11:24 AM) *
Certainly that's exactly how it seems today - which is why the posturing is so time wasting and pointless. That being so, why does anyone these days stand for election? What is their motivation? Regrettably in most cases it's the personal pursuit of power - simply I know best and I want to be in charge.

The system to get you there is simply to appeal to enough voters at a point in time - so of course, I'll be whatever you want. That's it for five years, and we go round again. Truly an elected dictatorship.

At local level, its not even elected. The paid officials run the Council against criteria set by central government. No room for any other input whatsoever. In reality, we don't elect councillors, rather amateur social workers.

Sad its come to this, but not really surprising.


ADMIN - can we have a 'LIKE' button?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cognosco
post Oct 20 2012, 07:06 PM
Post #26


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



QUOTE (GMR @ Oct 19 2012, 08:58 PM) *
They didn't mislead the electorate. The electorate were/ are too thick to understand politics.

The Lib Dems said that if they win the election no tuition frees would go up. They came third thus making their manifesto null and void. Therefore they had to barter their policies with another party; which is PR.

The problem here is that you don't know how politics works
.


Well I do realise that politics is not for the ordinary pleb only for the likes of your good self who understand it. But that is the problem! Why should politicians promise the earth just before an election and then completely renege on it after the election. What is the point of having a manifesto and millions spent on party conferences and then just doing the opposite when they get into power? Even you must have a niggling feeling this is not quite right? rolleyes.gif


--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adrian Hollister
post Oct 21 2012, 09:27 AM
Post #27


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613



QUOTE (Cognosco @ Oct 20 2012, 08:06 PM) *
Well I do realise that politics is not for the ordinary pleb only for the likes of your good self who understand it. But that is the problem! Why should politicians promise the earth just before an election and then completely renege on it after the election. What is the point of having a manifesto and millions spent on party conferences and then just doing the opposite when they get into power? Even you must have a niggling feeling this is not quite right? rolleyes.gif

Agree. Shameful.

As for RG playing the politics and releasing the story, perhaps it would be good to remind him that in the last council elections he approached the Greens and others and asked them not to stand in Labour target areas. Go democracy go...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Oct 21 2012, 03:32 PM
Post #28


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Oct 19 2012, 11:06 PM) *
GMR ... I stand up an applaud your posts. Bang on. And I say this without being your biggest fan nor a devotee of the Lib Dems. If what is said is true about RG, then he is making a common sense decision taking into account of the conditions before him.


Saying all that, I will never vote for any councillor that hung Simon Kirby like the Newbury Council did. All parties.




Thank you; I do have my moments occasionally..... but don't expect too much of me wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Oct 21 2012, 03:33 PM
Post #29


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Squelchy @ Oct 20 2012, 08:01 AM) *
Wasn't it also UKIP policy to support the AV vote?




Yes; and?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Oct 21 2012, 03:44 PM
Post #30


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Cognosco @ Oct 20 2012, 08:06 PM) *
Well I do realise that politics is not for the ordinary pleb only for the likes of your good self who understand it. But that is the problem! Why should politicians promise the earth just before an election and then completely renege on it after the election. What is the point of having a manifesto and millions spent on party conferences and then just doing the opposite when they get into power? Even you must have a niggling feeling this is not quite right? rolleyes.gif




A manifesto is what any party would do if they were elected torun the country on their own. The Tories failed, along with the other partiesso the next step is either call another election or try to form a coalitiongovernment with another party. When the Lib Dems agreed to work together is waspretty bloody obvious that they both couldn't use everything they said in theirmanifestos so they had to compromise. Most if not all European countries have aform of PR and therefore have to form coalitions with one or more parties. Thatmeans compromise.

I don't have a "niggling feeling" because I know how politics works.I agree I don't like PR and I see the difficulties of coalitions but if thatwas agreed then compromise is the order of the day.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Oct 21 2012, 03:49 PM
Post #31


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Oct 21 2012, 10:27 AM) *
Agree. Shameful.


How can it be "shameful" when it has always been that way; it is the same throughout the world. If you've got no out right winner then there is only the option of another election or coalition. Another election might not create a clear majority and would cost a lot of money. That is how it has always been throughout history.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cognosco
post Oct 21 2012, 04:28 PM
Post #32


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



QUOTE (GMR @ Oct 21 2012, 04:44 PM) *

A manifesto is what any party would do if they were elected torun the country on their own. The Tories failed, along with the other partiesso the next step is either call another election or try to form a coalitiongovernment with another party. When the Lib Dems agreed to work together is waspretty bloody obvious that they both couldn't use everything they said in theirmanifestos so they had to compromise. Most if not all European countries have aform of PR and therefore have to form coalitions with one or more parties. Thatmeans compromise.

I don't have a "niggling feeling" because I know how politics works.I agree I don't like PR and I see the difficulties of coalitions but if thatwas agreed then compromise is the order of the day.


That also means that politicians can act exactly like dodgy second hand car dealers and get away with anything they promise before the election as they know they will not have to abide by anything after the election if they form coalitions.

it also makes it very difficult for voters who, as I think this may apply to the majority of voters, vote not for who they want but vote for who they want to keep out? Voters like me who have no party they want to govern as there is no party that has policies that represent what I stand for. I am sure I am not alone in my thinking especially living in Newbury! rolleyes.gif


--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adrian Hollister
post Oct 21 2012, 04:51 PM
Post #33


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613



QUOTE (GMR @ Oct 21 2012, 04:49 PM) *
How can it be "shameful" when it has always been that way; it is the same throughout the world. If you've got no out right winner then there is only the option of another election or coalition. Another election might not create a clear majority and would cost a lot of money. That is how it has always been throughout history.

As said previously, it's the red line items that must not be compromised. This is what you stand for and believe in.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NWNREADER
post Oct 21 2012, 06:21 PM
Post #34


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Oct 21 2012, 10:27 AM) *
Agree. Shameful.

As for RG playing the politics and releasing the story, perhaps it would be good to remind him that in the last council elections he approached the Greens and others and asked them not to stand in Labour target areas. Go democracy go...


He never told us that!!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NWNREADER
post Oct 21 2012, 06:28 PM
Post #35


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Oct 21 2012, 05:51 PM) *
As said previously, it's the red line items that must not be compromised. This is what you stand for and believe in.


No such thing as a 'red line' item. The manifesto is always constructed that a party can say afterwards it cannot be done because of what they found when they took over.......
Most should be cut into 6" squares, but those printed on gloss paper can slip when used
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cognosco
post Oct 21 2012, 06:30 PM
Post #36


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Oct 21 2012, 07:21 PM) *
He never told us that!!!!


Looks as if he will make good politician material then? rolleyes.gif

But there again what would I know I don't understand politics perhaps Exhausted would to to explain it to us poor Plebs? rolleyes.gif


--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Oct 21 2012, 07:21 PM
Post #37


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Cognosco @ Oct 21 2012, 05:28 PM) *
That also means that politicians can act exactly like dodgy second hand car dealers and get away with anything they promise before the election as they know they will not have to abide by anything after the election if they form coalitions.


But that is up to the people. If they vote for a certain party and give them a majority then the manifesto will be carried out... If not then you've got compromise.

QUOTE
it also makes it very difficult for voters who, as I think this may apply to the majority of voters, vote not for who they want but vote for who they want to keep out? Voters like me who have no party they want to govern as there is no party that has policies that represent what I stand for. I am sure I am not alone in my thinking especially living in Newbury! rolleyes.gif



But that is our system. The only other system is PR which means we can only have compromise.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Oct 21 2012, 07:24 PM
Post #38


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Oct 21 2012, 05:51 PM) *
As said previously, it's the red line items that must not be compromised. This is what you stand for and believe in.




Actually you should read back to what I said. I didn't say it is what I believe in but the nature of our political system. Actually I am against PR as it causes the problems that have been highlighted. Coalition is just another form of PR (created by circumstances).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Richard Garvie
post Oct 22 2012, 02:36 AM
Post #39


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,974
Joined: 8-September 10
Member No.: 1,076



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Oct 21 2012, 09:27 AM) *
Agree. Shameful.

As for RG playing the politics and releasing the story, perhaps it would be good to remind him that in the last council elections he approached the Greens and others and asked them not to stand in Labour target areas. Go democracy go...

Not quite true Adrian. I appoached all the independents and smaller parties to try and work together to avoid competing for same seats. I suppose you should maybe go and read the emails we exchanged at the time and correct your post.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NWNREADER
post Oct 22 2012, 05:40 AM
Post #40


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265



I see no difference in the Hollister claim and the Garvie denial.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

15 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 07:34 AM