IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Repealing of Laws, Which laws would you have repealed or amended??
x2lls
post Jul 1 2010, 03:12 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,605
Joined: 25-November 09
Member No.: 511



Here's one I would most definately get shot of.

Squatters rights? what about ours?

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/Article...articleID=13804


--------------------
There their, loose loser!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jayjay
post Jul 1 2010, 04:08 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,012
Joined: 22-September 09
Member No.: 357



QUOTE (x2lls @ Jul 1 2010, 04:12 PM) *
Here's one I would most definately get shot of.

Squatters rights? what about ours?

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/Article...articleID=13804


I have a very long list, but my top one would be all the ethnic minority laws. The type that allow 'travellers' to build static homes on non dwelling land.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TallDarkAndHands...
post Jul 1 2010, 04:14 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (Jayjay @ Jul 1 2010, 05:08 PM) *
I have a very long list, but my top one would be all the ethnic minority laws. The type that allow 'travellers' to build static homes on non dwelling land.


The Human Rights Act. People are always using it as an excuse for their actions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Jul 1 2010, 04:41 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



Womens' suffrage, clueless, the lot of them!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Jul 1 2010, 04:49 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



Taking pictures in public places... that is a stupid law. We are not an East Germany country yet run by the Stasi.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
x2lls
post Jul 1 2010, 05:47 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,605
Joined: 25-November 09
Member No.: 511



QUOTE (GMR @ Jul 1 2010, 05:49 PM) *
Taking pictures in public places... that is a stupid law. We are not an East Germany country yet run by the Stasi.




Good one, considering that very subject is already in focus on the selfish driver topic.


cool.gif


--------------------
There their, loose loser!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Strafin
post Jul 1 2010, 05:51 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 55



What law are you talking about?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Jul 1 2010, 05:54 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (GMR @ Jul 1 2010, 05:49 PM) *
Taking pictures in public places... that is a stupid law. We are not an East Germany country yet run by the Stasi.
QUOTE (x2lls @ Jul 1 2010, 06:47 PM) *
Good one, considering that very subject is already in focus on the selfish driver topic. cool.gif

As far as I can tell, there is no law about taking photos in public places.

Or do you mean anti terrorism Laws? I understand that it is an offence to take pictures that would assist in a terrorist attack. It would seem that some police officers have been over-zealous in using that act to prevent photographers taking pictures of buildings, police and armed forces.

However, for those who resent the HRA, one might be careful what they wish for.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Jul 1 2010, 06:52 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Iommi @ Jul 1 2010, 06:54 PM) *
As far as I can tell, there is no law about taking photos in public places.

Or do you mean anti terrorism Laws? I understand that it is an offence to take pictures that would assist in a terrorist attack. It would seem that some police officers have been over-zealous in using that act to prevent photographers taking pictures of buildings, police and armed forces.

However, for those who resent the HRA, one might be careful what they wish for.


Exactly 'over zealous'. And here lies most of our problems.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roost
post Jul 1 2010, 07:54 PM
Post #10


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 360
Joined: 13-May 09
Member No.: 31



Over zealous or under zealous GMR? On one thread they do too much, on another too little. Come on son, which is it??! Or are you just happy police bashing no matter what the subject or actions?

Basically too critical and not enough action.


--------------------
Roost

Welcome to the jungle....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rosewinelover
post Jul 1 2010, 07:57 PM
Post #11


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 444
Joined: 25-June 10
From: Newbury
Member No.: 966





A law against prisoners being able to play the lottery, making ridiculous personal injury claims, and plastic surgery on the nhs (non medical)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Jul 1 2010, 08:17 PM
Post #12


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Roost @ Jul 1 2010, 08:54 PM) *
Over zealous or under zealous GMR? On one thread they do too much, on another too little. Come on son, which is it??! Or are you just happy police bashing no matter what the subject or actions?

Basically too critical and not enough action.


I think we are critical when it is necessary and complimentary when need be (of course when that day comes we'll put the bunting out and have street parties wink.gif ).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pinkfluffyclouds
post Jul 1 2010, 09:40 PM
Post #13


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 6-May 10
Member No.: 881



QUOTE (Rosewinelover @ Jul 1 2010, 11:27 AM) *
Object all you like, I do think your ignorant to think that. Of course people will disagree with me, wouldn't be nothing to discuss if we all thought the same. Like I said, I know people do drink all day but not everyone. Giving food vouchers instead of money effects everybody in the catergory. Again, I ask you if you were on benefits for whatever reason (you lost your home, job, family broke up etc) and you were told YOU were now receiveing food vouchers because of certain piss heads about - i'm sure you would feel victimised.

CONFUSED so you think it is okay for these people to be out drinking all day purchasing their booze "probably" with benefits and being abusive to passers by and not receive food vouchers in case they feel victimised BUT
QUOTE (Rosewinelover @ Jul 1 2010, 08:57 PM) *
A law against prisoners being able to play the lottery, making ridiculous personal injury claims, and plastic surgery on the nhs (non medical)

you don't think it is okay for prisoners to be allowed to play the lottery??? Bit of a double edged sword there..
QUOTE (Rosewinelover @ Jul 1 2010, 11:13 AM) *
Not all the people your referring to are 'down and out's. I think it is ignorant to tar everyone with the same brush. How would you feel if you were trying your best to sort your life out, was not drinking on the streets, struggling on what the government give you, to be then told you were having food vouchers. Yes, some people do abuse the system and drink all day - what else can they do if society has let them down. It is only a small minority who just buy booze, and we should be trying to solve the problem not scrutinising everyone.

"I think it is ignorant to tar everyone with the same brush" - people in prison are not all in there for comitting the same crime so aren't you doing exactly that with your brush.....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rosewinelover
post Jul 1 2010, 09:46 PM
Post #14


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 444
Joined: 25-June 10
From: Newbury
Member No.: 966



QUOTE (pinkfluffyclouds @ Jul 1 2010, 10:40 PM) *
CONFUSED so you think it is okay for these people to be out drinking all day purchasing their booze "probably" with benefits and being abusive to passers by and not receive food vouchers in case they feel victimised BUT
you don't think it is okay for prisoners to be allowed to play the lottery??? Bit of a double edged sword there..
"I think it is ignorant to tar everyone with the same brush" - people in prison are not all in there for comitting the same crime so aren't you doing exactly that with your brush.....


No, I don't think it is okay for them to do that, but I don't think the answer is the reasons I quoted. I personally have never been abbused by them.

I should of explained myself clearer - when I meant prisoners in my mind I meant peados/rapists/lifers for serious crimes. So no,I do not think they should be able to play the lottery and win loads of money (like Iorworth Hoare did, convicted of sex crimes) and I do not think they should be allowed free plastic surgery on the NHS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pinkfluffyclouds
post Jul 1 2010, 09:49 PM
Post #15


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 6-May 10
Member No.: 881



QUOTE (Rosewinelover @ Jul 1 2010, 10:46 PM) *
No, I don't think it is okay for them to do that, but I don't think the answer is the reasons I quoted. I personally have never been abbused by them.

I should of explained myself clearer - when I meant prisoners in my mind I meant peados/rapists/lifers for serious crimes. So no,I do not think they should be able to play the lottery and win loads of money (like Iorworth Hoare did, convicted of sex crimes) and I do not think they should be allowed free plastic surgery on the NHS

Who prisoners getting free plastic surgery or Joe Public?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rosewinelover
post Jul 1 2010, 09:50 PM
Post #16


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 444
Joined: 25-June 10
From: Newbury
Member No.: 966



QUOTE (pinkfluffyclouds @ Jul 1 2010, 10:49 PM) *
Who prisoners getting free plastic surgery or Joe Public?


Prisoners, the type i mentioned.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pinkfluffyclouds
post Jul 1 2010, 09:51 PM
Post #17


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 6-May 10
Member No.: 881



QUOTE (Rosewinelover @ Jul 1 2010, 10:50 PM) *
Prisoners, the type i mentioned.

Could be quite interesting going in with one face and coming out with another !! OR going in as one sex and coming out the other.... ohmy.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rosewinelover
post Jul 1 2010, 09:54 PM
Post #18


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 444
Joined: 25-June 10
From: Newbury
Member No.: 966



QUOTE (pinkfluffyclouds @ Jul 1 2010, 10:51 PM) *
Could be quite interesting going in with one face and coming out with another !! OR going in as one sex and coming out the other.... ohmy.gif


Quite a few of them do come out a woman!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bloggo
post Jul 2 2010, 08:15 AM
Post #19


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,863
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 41



I'd support the re-instatement of capital and corporal punishment for certain crimes.
Corporal for ASB and capital for sex crimes against children, child murderers, police killers and serial killers to name a few.


--------------------
Bloggo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Jul 2 2010, 09:08 AM
Post #20


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



Repeal drug laws. Everyone uses them anyway.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 03:43 PM