QUOTE (On the edge @ Dec 29 2010, 05:55 PM)
Actually, I'd vote 1. I'm pretty sure the whole of the cash doesn't go on supporting tha Mayor personally. Equally, and I'm sure I'll get shot down, but I suspect there are very very few poverty stricken 'over 50's' these days. That is taking the Rowntree definition of poverty and not the trendy wendy 'can't afford Reebok trainers' one.
On the other hand, there is nothing wrong with giving some proper civic dignity to the old office of Mayor. Again, although a different Council, I applauded WBC for replacing the Sovereign's portrait in the Council Chamber at Market Place and made it look less like the infant school hall appearence the previous administration thought fit for Council meetings.
The '50' was Biker1's hopeful edit, my suggestion was actually '80'. I wanted to illustrate the amount the Council spend on their civic budget which buys nothing of benefit and just gives our establishment worthies an opportunity to dress up in public. I think I'd just as well keep the tax myself and spend it how I like.