IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 20 Years Ago
Andy Capp
post Sep 12 2012, 11:56 AM
Post #41


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 12 2012, 12:37 PM) *
Cold war - would we have been a target if we didn't have US missiles in the country. Err no or few, we are not a strong military force and no serious threat to the former USSR.

We had our own nuclear capability AND significant atomic weapons research and manufacturing establishments on our door step, so to think the UK, let alone Newbury, would have been unharmed in a 'nuclear exchange' is in my view naive.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nothing Much
post Sep 12 2012, 01:59 PM
Post #42


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,690
Joined: 16-July 11
Member No.: 6,171



Sorry Adrian Hollister. We were a hostile force to Stalin.

There are websites that may not exist anymore that describe overflights
of USSR regions in specially adapted Spitfires with English Pilots, (maybe American funding.)Late 1945s .

The USAF bought the Canberra because it had a darn good camera facility.
A poster on another forum (now shut) sent me a snap taken whilst over the Isle of Wight
of the morning rush hour over Westminster bridge.
You could read the newspapers clasped under the arm not holding the brolly.

I think we were still a problem for the Kremlin.

I met up with Mrs NM for lunch the day after " Protect and Survive" was published.
We never got the leaflet about taking doors off hinges,making bunkers with mattresses.
I still live within walking distance of Westminster. I guess the leaflets never came our way.
You are seriously stuffed. After a couple of pints in Victoria we carried on with life.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adrian Hollister
post Sep 12 2012, 02:50 PM
Post #43


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Sep 12 2012, 12:56 PM) *
We had our own nuclear capability AND significant atomic weapons research and manufacturing establishments on our door step, so to think the UK, let alone Newbury, would have been unharmed in a 'nuclear exchange' is in my view naive.

1958 US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement

Quote: CIA proliferation assessment noted that "In many cases [Britain's sensitive technology in nuclear and missile fields] is based on technology received from the U.S. and could not legitimately be passed on without U.S. permission."

We were just an enslaved puppy to the US, supplying valuable plutonium from our Magnox reactors. They needed us as a control point for Europe and a first line of defence against USSR aggression.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Blake
post Sep 12 2012, 03:06 PM
Post #44


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 507
Joined: 19-May 09
Member No.: 75



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 12 2012, 03:50 PM) *
1958 US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement

Quote: CIA proliferation assessment noted that "In many cases [Britain's sensitive technology in nuclear and missile fields] is based on technology received from the U.S. and could not legitimately be passed on without U.S. permission."

We were just an enslaved puppy to the US, supplying valuable plutonium from our Magnox reactors. They needed us as a control point for Europe and a first line of defence against USSR aggression.


And Wikipedia is clearly the gospel according to Adrian Hollister.

Well if we were the first line of defence against the evil empire, clearly that was a valid choice as one side collapsed and the other was victorious. We held the line.

No country is perfect, but I know which side of the Berlin wall I wanted to be on.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post Sep 12 2012, 03:17 PM
Post #45


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



People used to travel to surrounding areas to eat and shop, and to be honest there is nothing spectacular about the choices here. It's like someone took another market town and plonked it where Newbury used to be. The market itself is nowhere like it used to be

So are you saying when the USAF were up at Greenham there was better shopping & places to eat in Newbury & that was thanks to them?
I know we got a McDomald's early because of the Base, but that is about it......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Sep 12 2012, 03:43 PM
Post #46


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 12 2012, 03:50 PM) *
1958 US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement

Quote: CIA proliferation assessment noted that "In many cases [Britain's sensitive technology in nuclear and missile fields] is based on technology received from the U.S. and could not legitimately be passed on without U.S. permission."

We were just an enslaved puppy to the US, supplying valuable plutonium from our Magnox reactors. They needed us as a control point for Europe and a first line of defence against USSR aggression.

But this is exactly my point. You said having the bombs at Greenham made Newbury vulnerable to a nuclear attack. I'm saying that we were vulnerable regardless of Greenham due to our close proximity to Aldermaston, Burghfield and Harwell.


QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 11 2012, 06:33 PM) *
It's bad enough that we were economically conquered by the US, but being occupied as well... bout time they all went home. All Greenham did was put Newbury on target with almost every nuclear attack strategy from the USSR. We would have been hit with up to 2 x 200kt ground level bursts and 2 x 350kt 5750ft bursts. Enough to render unsurvivable from as far north as Oxford, South as Basingstoke, and East to Heathrow.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penelope
post Sep 12 2012, 04:21 PM
Post #47


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 12 2012, 03:50 PM) *
1958 US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement

Quote: CIA proliferation assessment noted that "In many cases [Britain's sensitive technology in nuclear and missile fields] is based on technology received from the U.S. and could not legitimately be passed on without U.S. permission."

We were just an enslaved puppy to the US, supplying valuable plutonium from our Magnox reactors. They needed us as a control point for Europe and a first line of defence against USSR aggression.



Whilst the green parties take on the defence of the realm goes, "we intend to safeguard the United Kingdom by planting a big prickly hedge around the coast, and in time of war we intend to stop pruning it"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hugh Saskin
post Sep 12 2012, 04:27 PM
Post #48


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 560
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 37



QUOTE (Blake @ Sep 12 2012, 04:06 PM) *
No country is perfect, but I know which side of the Berlin wall I wanted to be on.


and how old exactly were you when the wall came down, Jonathan? laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post Sep 12 2012, 04:39 PM
Post #49


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



No, there would be no war at all with the Greens.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penelope
post Sep 12 2012, 04:42 PM
Post #50


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392



QUOTE (dannyboy @ Sep 12 2012, 05:39 PM) *
No, there would be no war at all with the Greens.


And hunger would be non existent and all the cars would run on magic moonbeams.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post Sep 12 2012, 04:46 PM
Post #51


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (Penelope @ Sep 12 2012, 05:42 PM) *
And hunger would be non existent and all the cars would run on magic moonbeams.

You believe in magic?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penelope
post Sep 12 2012, 04:47 PM
Post #52


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392



QUOTE (dannyboy @ Sep 12 2012, 05:46 PM) *
You believe in magic?


More than I believe in the greens.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post Sep 12 2012, 04:57 PM
Post #53


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (Penelope @ Sep 12 2012, 05:47 PM) *
More than I believe in the greens.



So given a choice between the Greens & the Magic Circle, you'd be voting for the Great Soprendo.


Odd given that they have been quite successful in Germany for several years.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penelope
post Sep 12 2012, 05:05 PM
Post #54


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392



QUOTE (dannyboy @ Sep 12 2012, 05:57 PM) *
So given a choice between the Greens & the Magic Circle, you'd be voting for the Great Soprendo.


Odd given that they have been quite successful in Germany for several years.


Look, I just think they are an irrelevance. However this is not the thread to go into this in depth. We risk having the forum police sending us to the naughty thread.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Sep 12 2012, 06:27 PM
Post #55


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Penelope @ Sep 12 2012, 05:21 PM) *
Whilst the green parties take on the defence of the realm goes, "we intend to safeguard the United Kingdom by planting a big prickly hedge around the coast, and in time of war we intend to stop pruning it"


Probably needs another thread and I'll probably be hung for even saying the following - which by the way does NOT imply any disrespect to members past or present of the armed forces. However, do we really need such a large armed force? What would be wrong with handing defence wholly to the EU and contributing on a per capita basis with the other members? Strikes me that we simply rush in, whenever another World power wants to intervene. The British Empire is no more.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adrian Hollister
post Sep 12 2012, 07:01 PM
Post #56


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613



QUOTE (Blake @ Sep 12 2012, 04:06 PM) *
And Wikipedia is clearly the gospel according to Adrian Hollister.

Easily recognisable reference point and doesn't require you to buy books on the subject.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adrian Hollister
post Sep 12 2012, 07:04 PM
Post #57


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613



QUOTE (Penelope @ Sep 12 2012, 05:21 PM) *
Whilst the green parties take on the defence of the realm goes, "we intend to safeguard the United Kingdom by planting a big prickly hedge around the coast, and in time of war we intend to stop pruning it"

The Tory/Labour policy seems to be grovel to the US and beg for help. Not sure selling out to the US is the best defence strategy when they go about frivolously invading for their desperate greed for oil. Best to have an honestly independent force of our own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jo Pepper
post Sep 12 2012, 07:15 PM
Post #58


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 56
Joined: 12-March 12
Member No.: 8,652



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 12 2012, 08:04 PM) *
The Tory/Labour policy seems to be grovel to the US and beg for help. Not sure selling out to the US is the best defence strategy when they go about frivolously invading for their desperate greed for oil. Best to have an honestly independent force of our own.

I agree. We have far too much reliance upon the USA and have too little focus on making our own force an independent deterrant. I have no confidence in the Labour party after getting involved in Iraq and torture. I have even less confidence in the Conservatives who seem to be buying more and more american stuff and less from the UK or EU.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penelope
post Sep 12 2012, 07:18 PM
Post #59


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392



QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 12 2012, 08:04 PM) *
The Tory/Labour policy seems to be grovel to the US and beg for help. Not sure selling out to the US is the best defence strategy when they go about frivolously invading for their desperate greed for oil. Best to have an honestly independent force of our own.



As we did in the last two world wars, hmm, worked really well then didn't it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adrian Hollister
post Sep 12 2012, 07:25 PM
Post #60


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613



QUOTE (Penelope @ Sep 12 2012, 08:18 PM) *
As we did in the last two world wars, hmm, worked really well then didn't it.

There is a difference between imperialistic intentions and peaceful ones. No matter how much the Tories would like to believe it, we are not a superpower any more. We were economically conquered. Get over it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 03:13 AM