Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Newbury News
|
|
20 Years Ago |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 11:56 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 12 2012, 12:37 PM) Cold war - would we have been a target if we didn't have US missiles in the country. Err no or few, we are not a strong military force and no serious threat to the former USSR. We had our own nuclear capability AND significant atomic weapons research and manufacturing establishments on our door step, so to think the UK, let alone Newbury, would have been unharmed in a 'nuclear exchange' is in my view naive.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 02:50 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Sep 12 2012, 12:56 PM) We had our own nuclear capability AND significant atomic weapons research and manufacturing establishments on our door step, so to think the UK, let alone Newbury, would have been unharmed in a 'nuclear exchange' is in my view naive. 1958 US-UK Mutual Defence AgreementQuote: CIA proliferation assessment noted that "In many cases [Britain's sensitive technology in nuclear and missile fields] is based on technology received from the U.S. and could not legitimately be passed on without U.S. permission." We were just an enslaved puppy to the US, supplying valuable plutonium from our Magnox reactors. They needed us as a control point for Europe and a first line of defence against USSR aggression.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 03:06 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 507
Joined: 19-May 09
Member No.: 75
|
QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 12 2012, 03:50 PM) 1958 US-UK Mutual Defence AgreementQuote: CIA proliferation assessment noted that "In many cases [Britain's sensitive technology in nuclear and missile fields] is based on technology received from the U.S. and could not legitimately be passed on without U.S. permission." We were just an enslaved puppy to the US, supplying valuable plutonium from our Magnox reactors. They needed us as a control point for Europe and a first line of defence against USSR aggression. And Wikipedia is clearly the gospel according to Adrian Hollister. Well if we were the first line of defence against the evil empire, clearly that was a valid choice as one side collapsed and the other was victorious. We held the line. No country is perfect, but I know which side of the Berlin wall I wanted to be on.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 03:43 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 12 2012, 03:50 PM) 1958 US-UK Mutual Defence AgreementQuote: CIA proliferation assessment noted that "In many cases [Britain's sensitive technology in nuclear and missile fields] is based on technology received from the U.S. and could not legitimately be passed on without U.S. permission." We were just an enslaved puppy to the US, supplying valuable plutonium from our Magnox reactors. They needed us as a control point for Europe and a first line of defence against USSR aggression. But this is exactly my point. You said having the bombs at Greenham made Newbury vulnerable to a nuclear attack. I'm saying that we were vulnerable regardless of Greenham due to our close proximity to Aldermaston, Burghfield and Harwell. QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 11 2012, 06:33 PM) It's bad enough that we were economically conquered by the US, but being occupied as well... bout time they all went home. All Greenham did was put Newbury on target with almost every nuclear attack strategy from the USSR. We would have been hit with up to 2 x 200kt ground level bursts and 2 x 350kt 5750ft bursts. Enough to render unsurvivable from as far north as Oxford, South as Basingstoke, and East to Heathrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 04:21 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392
|
QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 12 2012, 03:50 PM) 1958 US-UK Mutual Defence AgreementQuote: CIA proliferation assessment noted that "In many cases [Britain's sensitive technology in nuclear and missile fields] is based on technology received from the U.S. and could not legitimately be passed on without U.S. permission." We were just an enslaved puppy to the US, supplying valuable plutonium from our Magnox reactors. They needed us as a control point for Europe and a first line of defence against USSR aggression. Whilst the green parties take on the defence of the realm goes, "we intend to safeguard the United Kingdom by planting a big prickly hedge around the coast, and in time of war we intend to stop pruning it"
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 04:42 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Sep 12 2012, 05:39 PM) No, there would be no war at all with the Greens. And hunger would be non existent and all the cars would run on magic moonbeams.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 04:46 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (Penelope @ Sep 12 2012, 05:42 PM) And hunger would be non existent and all the cars would run on magic moonbeams. You believe in magic?
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 04:47 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Sep 12 2012, 05:46 PM) You believe in magic? More than I believe in the greens.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 04:57 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (Penelope @ Sep 12 2012, 05:47 PM) More than I believe in the greens. So given a choice between the Greens & the Magic Circle, you'd be voting for the Great Soprendo. Odd given that they have been quite successful in Germany for several years.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 05:05 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Sep 12 2012, 05:57 PM) So given a choice between the Greens & the Magic Circle, you'd be voting for the Great Soprendo.
Odd given that they have been quite successful in Germany for several years. Look, I just think they are an irrelevance. However this is not the thread to go into this in depth. We risk having the forum police sending us to the naughty thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 06:27 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (Penelope @ Sep 12 2012, 05:21 PM) Whilst the green parties take on the defence of the realm goes, "we intend to safeguard the United Kingdom by planting a big prickly hedge around the coast, and in time of war we intend to stop pruning it" Probably needs another thread and I'll probably be hung for even saying the following - which by the way does NOT imply any disrespect to members past or present of the armed forces. However, do we really need such a large armed force? What would be wrong with handing defence wholly to the EU and contributing on a per capita basis with the other members? Strikes me that we simply rush in, whenever another World power wants to intervene. The British Empire is no more.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 07:01 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613
|
QUOTE (Blake @ Sep 12 2012, 04:06 PM) And Wikipedia is clearly the gospel according to Adrian Hollister. Easily recognisable reference point and doesn't require you to buy books on the subject.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 07:04 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613
|
QUOTE (Penelope @ Sep 12 2012, 05:21 PM) Whilst the green parties take on the defence of the realm goes, "we intend to safeguard the United Kingdom by planting a big prickly hedge around the coast, and in time of war we intend to stop pruning it" The Tory/Labour policy seems to be grovel to the US and beg for help. Not sure selling out to the US is the best defence strategy when they go about frivolously invading for their desperate greed for oil. Best to have an honestly independent force of our own.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 07:15 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 56
Joined: 12-March 12
Member No.: 8,652
|
QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 12 2012, 08:04 PM) The Tory/Labour policy seems to be grovel to the US and beg for help. Not sure selling out to the US is the best defence strategy when they go about frivolously invading for their desperate greed for oil. Best to have an honestly independent force of our own. I agree. We have far too much reliance upon the USA and have too little focus on making our own force an independent deterrant. I have no confidence in the Labour party after getting involved in Iraq and torture. I have even less confidence in the Conservatives who seem to be buying more and more american stuff and less from the UK or EU.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 07:18 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392
|
QUOTE (Adrian Hollister @ Sep 12 2012, 08:04 PM) The Tory/Labour policy seems to be grovel to the US and beg for help. Not sure selling out to the US is the best defence strategy when they go about frivolously invading for their desperate greed for oil. Best to have an honestly independent force of our own. As we did in the last two world wars, hmm, worked really well then didn't it.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2012, 07:25 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 299
Joined: 6-January 10
Member No.: 613
|
QUOTE (Penelope @ Sep 12 2012, 08:18 PM) As we did in the last two world wars, hmm, worked really well then didn't it. There is a difference between imperialistic intentions and peaceful ones. No matter how much the Tories would like to believe it, we are not a superpower any more. We were economically conquered. Get over it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|