Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Newbury News
|
|
Investigation into Election vote count. |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2015, 09:47 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 151
Joined: 28-June 12
Member No.: 8,763
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Sep 17 2015, 05:09 PM) This week's NWN reported that the investigation has been held and in summary, WBC's Chief Executive admits there were major problems. This was put down to poor supervision, lack of numeracy skills, tiredness and (of course) a computer system failure! Yes, the Thatcham North result is wrong. Anyway, nothing can be done about it as it would need a High Court challenge.
Phew, that's ok then! Good old Dave Goff's tin of whitewash will be empty soon....
(Just a couple of thoughts.
1 If our democracy is really so precious, wouldn't it be a right gesture if the Thatcham North incumbent simply resigned and the correct candidate appointed instead?
2. I trust we won't hear about any 'UK' observers wittering on about such issues in other parts of the World.) Whilst the 'rules' might not allow automatic appointment of the correct candidate, I completely agree that the Thatcham North incumbent should resign and there should be another election. I also feel that this result requires a more thorough independent investigation. I thought that was what the Electoral Commission was for, but it appears that yet again this is a part of Government that is self regulated. Here is the Electoral Commission report: http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__da...-2015-polls.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 08:39 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 151
Joined: 28-June 12
Member No.: 8,763
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Sep 20 2015, 08:04 AM) I think this is an absolute travesty and does call into question our democratic process. It also calls into serious question the management of the Council.
By the way, have we heard anything from the Lord Lieutenant of Berkshire who is the Returning Officer? Or is that just another 'ceremonial' role? The Returning Officer for West Berkshire is Nick Carter, the Chief Executive of West Berkshire a Council - a non elected, paid for position: http://decisionmaking.westberks.gov.uk/doc...%20Appendix.pdfI believe the Lord Lieutenant of Berkshire is a ceremonial position, although I imagine it carries some political clout.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 11:17 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011
|
QUOTE (Exhausted @ Sep 20 2015, 08:41 AM) You got a bug on your keyboard No, it's these new teeth...
--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 11:29 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (Lolly @ Sep 20 2015, 09:39 AM) The Returning Officer for West Berkshire is Nick Carter, the Chief Executive of West Berkshire a Council - a non elected, paid for position: http://decisionmaking.westberks.gov.uk/doc...%20Appendix.pdfI believe the Lord Lieutenant of Berkshire is a ceremonial position, although I imagine it carries some political clout. Yes, I stand corrected. The appointment is made by the Secretary of State where the constituency crosses district boundaries. I'd say that demonstrates we'd be even more justified in getting rid of the 'lets pretend' ceremonial roles like Mayor and Lord Lieutenant etc. Way back, when I was involved in an election in the 1970s and a minor blip occurred, the Sheriff of the County explained that our Constituency's returning officer was actually 'acting'. Acting on behalf of the Sovereign's representative, the Lord Lieutenant. This was a deliberate separation of powers so that the co duct of an election was the responsibility of the Crown rather than the Government.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 06:52 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Sep 20 2015, 12:29 PM) Way back, when I was involved in an election in the 1970s I thought you were involved in the last election, as a candidate?
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 08:28 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (user23 @ Sep 20 2015, 07:52 PM) I thought you were involved in the last election, as a candidate? Yes, but there have been a good few before then. Does this mean that like our innumerate WBC you hadn't appreciated that we have had many elections previously.....even some on the same day! Still, mustn't criticise, or we'll be on a fizzer before Givernance and Ethics. Shame really, because given the admitted performance, start to finish, I can find plenty of other suitable words not necessarily beginning with n. Yes, I did go to the count and yes where appropriate saw and pointed out errors. Having actually been involved in counts myself in other places I must admit I was surprised by the relaxed and almost amateur approach. I will save other observations for those who need them.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 21 2015, 09:06 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,970
Joined: 29-December 09
From: Dogging in a car park somewhere
Member No.: 592
|
QUOTE (MontyPython @ Sep 20 2015, 09:06 PM) Lovely snide remark from the WBC web manager I love our council so, so much . I don't love the weather today though, it's a little chilly this morning
--------------------
:p Grammar: the difference between knowing your poop and knowing you're poop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|