Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Newbury News
|
|
WBC parking con |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2015, 12:42 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50
|
QUOTE (spartacus @ Feb 21 2015, 12:40 PM) If only you'd waited 24 hours you would have saved us from your conspiracy theory nonsense
They're out to get you 24 hours after someone reported something was wrong they've fixed it? On a Saturday? Sounds like great service to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2015, 12:46 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33
|
QUOTE (spartacus @ Feb 21 2015, 12:40 PM) If only you'd waited 24 hours you could have saved us from reading all your conspiracy theory nonsense They're out to get you And who is saying it is "nonsense"? A WBC employee put on this forum to cover their backs? What I said was factual. Those signs were reported last year; reported to Traffic wardens and WBC itself. If they were concerned about misleading signs then why didn't they do something about it last year? They only decided now because a member of the public exposed what they were doing. If anybody is out to get anybody then it is people like you defending WBC.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2015, 12:58 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,722
Joined: 4-September 09
Member No.: 320
|
QUOTE (user23 @ Feb 21 2015, 12:42 PM) 24 hours after someone reported something was wrong they've fixed it? On a Saturday? Sounds like great service to me. Sorry, sounds like a "Sh!te boys, we've been caught with our pants down again, hope this doesn't make the Daily Wail like our other screw ups. Someone sort it today and we'll pretend it was done months ago. Those photos could have been taken last year so we're OK. Get one of our abusive councillors to front this one. Our Newbury Today spokesperson is already on the case"
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2015, 01:03 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 936
Joined: 16-June 12
Member No.: 8,755
|
QUOTE (user23 @ Feb 21 2015, 12:42 PM) 24 hours after someone reported something was wrong they've fixed it? On a Saturday?
Sounds like great service to me. It would be if it were so - but as usual you twist the facts to try and make WBC look efficient. GMR states that he reported it last year which in my book is nearer 3 months at the least if he reported it on the last day of the year! It may be 24 hours since it went on here but nobody of any worth from WBC reads these forums we are repeatedly told.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2015, 01:07 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (user23 @ Feb 21 2015, 12:42 PM) 24 hours after someone reported something was wrong they've fixed it? On a Saturday?
Sounds like great service to me. I think we should apologise, you clearly don't work for WBC....FGW maybe
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 26 2015, 07:12 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33
|
It seems that a story has been generated by a Newbury Weekly News journalist concerning this thread. Dan Cooper is the Newbury Weekly News reporter. http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/2015/council...ng-parking-signThe Journalist article is below QUOTE WEST Berkshire Council has denied that it delayed replacing parking signs in Newbury to gain extra revenue from unsuspecting motorists.
When the council introduced on street parking charges on July 28 2014, it erected signs informing people that they were due to be implemented.
One of the signs, at Old Bath Road, tells motorists that charges are going to come into effect on July 28 – but doesn't specify which year.
One disgruntled motorist says that keeping the sign up for six months after the charges were introduced has let people people park there in the belief that charges don't come into effect until July 28 2015.
Glenn Renshaw claims he notified the council of the "misleading and unclear" signs in September 2014. However, this week the council said it could find no record of his complaint.
Mr Renshaw, who uses the road every day said: "People in Newbury will probably know that on street parking came in last year, but what about people coming in from outside the area?
"From my understanding, quite a few people have been booked. I think they (the council) should pay back anybody who was booked within that time as a result of the signage.
"Why did it take them until February 2015 to replace the sign?
"There have been many complaints about parking recently and it feels like the council is abusing its position."
Mr Renshaw put a picture of the sign on the NewburyToday forum last week and within 18 hours it was replaced.
A spokeswoman for the council, Peta Stoddart-Crompton, said: "There is no nefarious reason for a year not being shown.
"It was always the intention that the signs would remain in place after the introduction of the parking restrictions and be amended with all reference to the date being removed after about six months.
"The signs were not taken down, as they still serve as a warning of the parking restrictions in place.
"The reference to dates has however been removed from the signs. This was on our task list prior to the forum post so no, it wasn't due to that."
The council said it did not agree with Mr Renshaw's views that the signs were misleading or confusing to motorists and said it would not be compensating motorists who received a ticket.
However, it said all motorists had the right to appeal to the Independent Traffic Penalty Tribunal.
Speaking to the NWN in 2013, a spokeswoman for the Department of Transport, Melanie Purkiss, said: "The Department provides clear guidelines to councils to help them produce signs that comply with the regulations."
"It is not for central Government to police council's traffic signs – this rightly falls to elected local politicians who are accountable to their residents and communities."
The council has come under fire recently after it was revealed that some of its parking bays were smaller than government guidelines.
Last week, the NWN also revealed that the council had not received hundreds of thousands of pounds owed to them in parking revenue from Parkway developer Standard Life Investments.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 26 2015, 09:19 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 1,722
Joined: 4-September 09
Member No.: 320
|
QUOTE (Cognosco @ Feb 26 2015, 08:07 PM) It is truly worrying how the Council are unable to grasp just why the signage should have been replaced with a new appropriate sign as soon as the charging had come into force? Just when you thought our local Authorities had reached new lows of incompetence they amaze you with even more feats of idiotic incompetence! The worry here is that these are visible signs of the council's lack of care and their belligerent attitude but what about the things that we, the electorate, don't and can't see. Once again, a simple sorry chaps would have done and perhaps a little contriteness by offering to review the parking fines which had been issued would have been nice. A few quid handed back is an insignificant amount compared with the Parkway giveaway.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2015, 05:02 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33
|
QUOTE One of the signs, at Old Bath Road, tells motorists that charges are going to come into effect on July 28 – but doesn't specify which year. And the reason? The reason being is to mislead those that park there in the belief that it is free until July 28th. Putting a year date on the signs would have informed the public better, thus no extra charges for not having a paid ticket. But doing that would miss the point of the councils objectives; and that is to get more money, by hook or by crook. QUOTE A spokeswoman for the council, Peta Stoddart-Crompton, said: "There is no nefarious reason for a year not being shown. Whether that is true or not, it still was misleading and a misleading sign could/ and has gained them extra monies in fines. QUOTE "It was always the intention that the signs would remain in place after the introduction of the parking restrictions and be amended with all reference to the date being removed after about six months. Six months in the case of being found out, however, if it had been year when it was brought to the councils attention then the above would have read "…removed after one year". They must pay somebody to have an answer for every occasion. Probably lawyers. QUOTE "The signs were not taken down, as they still serve as a warning of the parking restrictions in place. Nothing wrong with that statement, other than it also added a date that was long gone by and with no year date on it. This misled people into parking in that area on the understanding that they could park there free – of this year – until 28 July. QUOTE "The reference to dates has however been removed from the signs. This was on our task list prior to the forum post so no, it wasn't due to that." And I was just psychic. Of course, if I had mentioned it on the forum in a year's time, then they would have said the same. QUOTE The council said it did not agree with Mr Renshaw's views that the signs were misleading or confusing to motorists… Unless of course you happen to be the motorist. However, if it wasn't misleading to the motorist then explain how you managed to get people to park there under the belief that they could park there free until July 28. QUOTE …and said it would not be compensating motorists who received a ticket. Of course not; the whole point of the misleading signs is to make more money so that you can justify taking even more money when the wages discussions comes around again. QUOTE However, it said all motorists had the right to appeal to the Independent Traffic Penalty Tribunal. For misleading signs? But how do they/ or would they know that they were misleading until somebody brings it up? Not everybody buys the NWN or lives in the area. So shouldn't the council inform those that were misled so that they can take action? QUOTE Speaking to the NWN in 2013, a spokeswoman for the Department of Transport, Melanie Purkiss, said: "The Department provides clear guidelines to councils to help them produce signs that comply with the regulations." And in this case they broke it by misleading the motorist into not getting a ticket to park in that place. QUOTE "It is not for central Government to police council's traffic signs – this rightly falls to elected local politicians who are accountable to their residents and communities." Yes; but what happens when the politicians are of the same party of those that work in the council? Look at the latest scandals, such as cash payments etc.; so are our politicians the right people to overlook the councillors?
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 28 2015, 09:09 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56
|
QUOTE (GMR @ Feb 27 2015, 05:02 PM) And the reason? The reason being is to mislead those that park there in the belief that it is free until July 28th. Putting a year date on the signs would have informed the public better, thus no extra charges for not having a paid ticket. But doing that would miss the point of the councils objectives; and that is to get more money, by hook or by crook. That is absolute nonsense and you know it. Even the strongest council detractors here would not say anything so stupid (or possibly actionable, if the council could be bothered).
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 28 2015, 11:42 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (JeffG @ Feb 28 2015, 09:09 AM) That is absolute nonsense and you know it. Even the strongest council detractors here would not say anything so stupid (or possibly actionable, if the council could be bothered). I don't see anything actionable. I don't think it is that stupid either. Or at least no less stupid that an sign that displays things like 'wef'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|