IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> suggestions regarding council cuts
Cognosco
post Mar 7 2016, 02:31 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



Oh dear oh deary me! Letting the plebs get involved with council business?
Far too dangerous where will it all end?
Come on User get posting to counteract these ridiculous ideas!
Petra will need tranquilizers if this is allowed, it needs a very high pay grade indeed, and many cups of coffee at very many meetings attended by highly skilled and responsible councillors and officers to brainstorm this problem of funding shortage.
No the plebs must be told it is far too complicated for the likes of them to try and meddle with this serious business of councilling! rolleyes.gif

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/news/home/17...ternatives.html


--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
spartacus
post Mar 7 2016, 06:41 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 09
Member No.: 221



"Sell gas and electricity to make profits for the council"... eh? If that list of 30 suggestions is what they've come up with then good luck..... "Hold a referendum to see if people want to pay more council tax to retain services" NOBODY wants to pay MORE rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cognosco
post Mar 7 2016, 07:49 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



QUOTE (spartacus @ Mar 7 2016, 06:41 PM) *
"Sell gas and electricity to make profits for the council"... eh? If that list of 30 suggestions is what they've come up with then good luck..... "Hold a referendum to see if people want to pay more council tax to retain services" NOBODY wants to pay MORE rolleyes.gif


Well I assume as services are being cut then our precept will reduce surely? rolleyes.gif


--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post Mar 7 2016, 08:26 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



QUOTE (spartacus @ Mar 7 2016, 06:41 PM) *
"Sell gas and electricity to make profits for the council"... eh? If that list of 30 suggestions is what they've come up with then good luck..... "Hold a referendum to see if people want to pay more council tax to retain services" NOBODY wants to pay MORE rolleyes.gif

The selling gas option was bizarre, but a referrendum on the option of paying more tax or a selection of which services people actually want is a decent enough idea, and there are plenty of people who really do want a full range of public services and expect to pay for them, though I condede that it's likely to create a tyranny of the majority with more people than not choosing to keep their money.


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Mar 7 2016, 10:11 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



There were other options sent in and not published, such as abolishing the town / parish councils, significantly reducing the number of Councillors, make the management structure flatter.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Mar 7 2016, 10:27 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (spartacus @ Mar 7 2016, 06:41 PM) *
"Sell gas and electricity to make profits for the council"... eh? If that list of 30 suggestions is what they've come up with then good luck..... "Hold a referendum to see if people want to pay more council tax to retain services" NOBODY wants to pay MORE rolleyes.gif


Yes, pretty dumb, but actually returning pre 1945 municipal arrangements would actually bring independent profit streams and provide a substantial base of productive work. That would also be an impetus for innovative and dynamic management. Not just electricity and gas, but telecoms, broadband, public transport, (dare I say) housing etc.

I used to be able to agree with you that nobody wants to pay more, but after what's been happening, more and more would do just that, if asked.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
spartacus
post Mar 7 2016, 11:18 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 09
Member No.: 221



QUOTE (On the edge @ Mar 7 2016, 06:41 PM) *
I used to be able to agree with you that nobody wants to pay more, but after what's been happening, more and more would do just that, if asked.

I'm not so sure the majority are actually prepared to be that charitable and would rather cherry pick what they pay for. If someone asked me if I wanted to be a philanthropist I'd decline the offer to help paying to bus kids to school who lived within walking distance for instance. It turns out that I'm not that altruistic and as I haven't used the library for years I'd cross that one off too....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
spartacus
post Mar 7 2016, 11:34 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 09
Member No.: 221



The problem is, we're going to be made to pay more for less anyway, as services are being removed yet council tax is going up. Asking if we'd be willing to pay a little more on top to help keep some of those services is going to be difficult to manage I suspect.

There's no doubt many of us are compassionate enough to understand why some of the social support for the disabled should be retained. I wouldn't however support chipping in if that money was continuing to subsidise buses to outlying villages. That's just giving money to bus companies to help them stay profitable.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Mar 8 2016, 01:04 AM
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



I'd pay £50.00 a year for a library card and consider it good value.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Mar 8 2016, 01:34 AM
Post #10


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



My concern, although I have only used it once decades ago is CAB. Paradoxically, I would imagine there will be greater need for it now than before.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Mar 8 2016, 08:22 AM
Post #11


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (spartacus @ Mar 7 2016, 11:18 PM) *
I'm not so sure the majority are actually prepared to be that charitable and would rather cherry pick what they pay for. If someone asked me if I wanted to be a philanthropist I'd decline the offer to help paying to bus kids to school who lived within walking distance for instance. It turns out that I'm not that altruistic and as I haven't used the library for years I'd cross that one off too....

You are quite right, but arguably that's not a refusal, just a different funding model. I'd also argue that the NHS has exactly the same dilemma; and some are quite willing to pay extra for certain services. The debate then turns to what really are the 'essential services'? Schools are a case in point; I would be willing, and indeed did, pay additional transport costs to send my off spring to the school of choice. What this also opens up is real political difference at local level; real choice.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post Mar 8 2016, 09:59 AM
Post #12


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



QUOTE (On the edge @ Mar 7 2016, 10:11 PM) *
There were other options sent in and not published, such as abolishing the town / parish councils, significantly reducing the number of Councillors, make the management structure flatter.

Things are not always as they seem. A protest against cuts is not always a protest against cuts, sometimes it's and opportunity for one aspiring faction of local-government parasites to bad-mouth another faction of parasites in the hope of displacing them - you'll get some mild criticism of the "cuts are bad" kind, but they're never going to suggest anything as radical as culling the town council or even anything as obvious as dropping the mayor, losing the market, self-managing the allotments, and abandoning the town hall, not if their intentions are self-serving and parasitic at any rate, because these for them are the prize, it's this empire of busy-work and the prestige of managing it that all these parasites crave. It's quite the litmus test for it really.


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post Mar 8 2016, 10:17 AM
Post #13


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



I don't want to be taxed to pay for fox-furred robes, chains of office, and assorted othet ceremonial niff-naff and flummary. I don't object to being taxed, but I would like that £100k that is currently spent on the Mayor and other Town Council cetemonial civic flummery to be spent on something more deserving like libraries and social services.

Likewise that £100k that keeps the Town Council in the Town Hall. It's just a parish council, so let them manage the parks from an office in a community hall and spend that money on something more deserving.

Likewise allotments. If it didn't come with a fight the town's allotmenteers would gladly manage their own service, so another £50k to be spent on something more deserving.

Ditto the market. There are other shops, we don't need our Town Council spending £10k on this moribund performance. Spend the money on essential services.

When it comes down to it half of the Town Council's £1,000,000 precept is spent on vanity projects and busy work. It's not that painful being taxed for it, but it should be spent on public services.


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TallDarkAndHands...
post Mar 8 2016, 08:48 PM
Post #14


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60



A local lottery with a twist is the answer.

The loser forfeits house and all assets.
Only those with a net worth of £1 million plus are entered.

Will bring down house prices and only one poor bugger loses out. laugh.gif

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Turin Machine
post Mar 8 2016, 10:32 PM
Post #15


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,682
Joined: 23-September 10
From: In the lower 40
Member No.: 1,104



Its getting so bad I almost feel like cancelling the order for the new Bently! Hmm, may just cut down on the Moet for a teensy bit instead. There! I feel better already, doing my bit you know? Doing my bit. laugh.gif


--------------------
Gammon. And proud!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Mar 9 2016, 08:11 AM
Post #16


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Simon Kirby @ Mar 8 2016, 09:59 AM) *
Things are not always as they seem. A protest against cuts is not always a protest against cuts, sometimes it's and opportunity for one aspiring faction of local-government parasites to bad-mouth another faction of parasites in the hope of displacing them - you'll get some mild criticism of the "cuts are bad" kind, but they're never going to suggest anything as radical as culling the town council or even anything as obvious as dropping the mayor, losing the market, self-managing the allotments, and abandoning the town hall, not if their intentions are self-serving and parasitic at any rate, because these for them are the prize, it's this empire of busy-work and the prestige of managing it that all these parasites crave. It's quite the litmus test for it really.


Yes, I think you are absolutely right.

The malaise is institutionalised. Let's look back, when Berkshire was abolished, we still retained the ceremonial flummery. So we now have a Constitutional Monarch represented by a Ceremonial Lord Lieutenant for a non existent County, to whom our Ceremonial Mayor, wearing his non historic chain pays homage on behalf of a powerless Parish Council, who work from a building deemed not fit for purpose by other local government officers.

....and Britian has the skills and knowledge to exist on its own!


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Mar 9 2016, 10:55 AM
Post #17


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (Turin Machine @ Mar 8 2016, 10:32 PM) *
Its getting so bad I almost feel like cancelling the order for the new Bently! Hmm, may just cut down on the Moet for a teensy bit instead. There! I feel better already, doing my bit you know? Doing my bit. laugh.gif

Channelling the spirit of Petra are you?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Mar 9 2016, 10:56 AM
Post #18


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (On the edge @ Mar 9 2016, 08:11 AM) *
Yes, I think you are absolutely right.

The malaise is institutionalised. Let's look back, when Berkshire was abolished, we still retained the ceremonial flummery. So we now have a Constitutional Monarch represented by a Ceremonial Lord Lieutenant for a non existent County, to whom our Ceremonial Mayor, wearing his non historic chain pays homage on behalf of a powerless Parish Council, who work from a building deemed not fit for purpose by other local government officers.

....and Britian has the skills and knowledge to exist on its own!

To be fair, we do get another flagpole. I mean, come on.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cognosco
post Mar 9 2016, 11:41 AM
Post #19


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



QUOTE (je suis Charlie @ Mar 9 2016, 10:56 AM) *
To be fair, we do get another flagpole. I mean, come on.


Well a flagpole is important you know? Only trouble is the last time I walked through the market place I was the only one there! Apparently the market place is a very underused part of town on most days so really not a good place to have a flagpole anyway? rolleyes.gif

I think a better site for the flagpoles would be on the bridge over the Kennet on the A339 more people would see it and it would give people stuck in the traffic something to distract them. rolleyes.gif


--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Mar 9 2016, 11:42 AM
Post #20


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (je suis Charlie @ Mar 9 2016, 10:56 AM) *
To be fair, we do get another flagpole. I mean, come on.


Yeah! Ironically, just so they can run up their home made just pretend flag when they have to fly a real one.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 04:16 PM