Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Newbury News
|
|
Blatenet Pro-Hunting Reporting by the NWN |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2011, 11:38 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Dec 30 2011, 10:54 AM) I'd like to see how Biker1 would have reported the event. He probably wouldn't have given it the oxygen of publicity.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2011, 11:41 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (JeffG @ Dec 30 2011, 11:38 AM) He probably wouldn't have given it the oxygen of publicity. Censorship is in itself a bias report.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2011, 02:32 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212
|
QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Dec 30 2011, 12:05 PM) 'Not reported' is not the same as 'ignored', let alone censorship.
If no-one tells NWN an event is taking place (so they may send a reporter or invite a report) or sends in a report independently, it is hard to say the event has been ignored or censored. The editors role - alongside the commercial responsibility - is to ensure a broad spread of local flavour, content is legal and of genuine interest. While not perfect, the NWN has steered a path through many local events of national significance over the last 30-odd years, often being far more balanced than the nationals. Also, they have ruffled 'establishment' feathers. There always appear to be two sides of interest? Ensured they sat on the fence? I must have missed an issue that time? Naughty NWN!
--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2011, 02:39 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (JeffG @ Dec 30 2011, 11:56 AM) Hmm. Is ignoring something the same as censorship? I'm sure a lot of other stuff goes on that doesn't get reported. In my view, a paper wilfully ignoring something to deny that event 'oxygen of publicity', is censoring that event.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2011, 03:20 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Dec 30 2011, 02:39 PM) In my view, a paper wilfully ignoring something to deny that event 'oxygen of publicity', is censoring that event. I would agree, but when has it happened?
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2011, 03:26 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,414
Joined: 20-November 10
Member No.: 1,265
|
QUOTE (Cognosco @ Dec 30 2011, 02:32 PM) There always appear to be two sides of interest? Agreed, and if enough people believe the alternative perspective has not been put forward then the opportunity exists to seek a follow-up.Ensured they sat on the fence? Look back to the Greenham protests, the By-pass, Michael Ryan and the like. NWN did not sit on the fence, just reported what happened and were very mindful of the local needs. Having witnessed the behaviour of 'serious' national journalists post-Hungerford I suggest locals should be proud of the way the NWN handled matters.I must have missed an issue that time? Naughty NWN! NWN and WBC were (are) almost at war for many years. The opacity of our council is largely due (I feel) to the reluctance to let the NWN know anything.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2011, 03:56 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Dec 30 2011, 03:20 PM) I would agree, but when has it happened? I'm not saying it has, I'm commenting on JeffG's suggestion that Biker1 wouldn't give the event the 'oxygen of publicity', which in my view is another way of being biased, which is what Biker1 is accusing the NWN of in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2 2012, 08:23 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 4-May 10
Member No.: 877
|
QUOTE (Biker1 @ Dec 28 2010, 01:27 PM) May I start by stating quite categorically here that I DO NOT want to start a debate about Fox Hunting. It is banned and that is that. What I am highlighting here is the blatant pro-hunting reporting that we have every year by the NWN as shown here and will, no doubt, be repeated in the newspaper. Presumably you are not concerned at the blatant pro-motorcycling reporting by the NWN?
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2 2012, 10:43 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103
|
QUOTE (oldharry @ Jan 2 2012, 09:23 AM) Presumably you are not concerned at the blatant pro-motorcycling reporting by the NWN? T wat! I think I am going to have to change my moniker on here because otherwise every time I enter a debate it will be turned into a motorcycling argument by this idiot!!
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2 2012, 11:07 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 4-May 10
Member No.: 877
|
QUOTE (Biker1 @ Jan 2 2012, 10:43 AM) T wat! I think I am going to have to change my moniker on here because otherwise every time I enter a debate it will be turned into a motorcycling argument by this idiot!! I asked a perfectly reasonable question. Why was it necessary for you to resort to abuse?
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2 2012, 11:17 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (oldharry @ Jan 2 2012, 11:07 AM) I asked a perfectly reasonable question. Why was it necessary for you to resort to abuse? Yes, Biker1 is guilty of double standards sometimes.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2 2012, 11:27 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Jan 2 2012, 01:17 PM) Yes, Biker1 is guilty of double standards sometimes. As I said in another thread, Andy, I have tried over the years to be civil on this forum but others do not reciprocate. Yourself being the main culprit. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em!
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|