IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  « < 7 8 9  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Baby Peter disclosure today
Rachel
post Aug 21 2009, 12:18 PM
Post #161


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 151
Joined: 7-August 09
Member No.: 258



Any one see the program about the murder of Lesley Molseed? Good job Stefan Kiszko wasn't sent to the gallows, eh?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Aug 21 2009, 01:35 PM
Post #162


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Rachel @ Aug 21 2009, 01:18 PM) *
Any one see the program about the murder of Lesley Molseed? Good job Stefan Kiszko wasn't sent to the gallows, eh?



First of all I agree (about Kiszko etc). Secondly; people like you bring up the same old argument. Who said that if we had the death penalty again it would be with the same flaws? This is an old trick that is used by anti-death-penalty PC's; force people to look at the past, show the faults etc. For a start who said it would play that way if we brought it back? I wouldn't accept the death penalty brought back under the same old lines. There would have to be safe guards.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sarah
post Aug 21 2009, 02:37 PM
Post #163


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 12-July 09
Member No.: 191



QUOTE (GMR @ Aug 21 2009, 02:35 PM) *
First of all I agree (about Kiszko etc). Secondly; people like you bring up the same old argument. Who said that if we had the death penalty again it would be with the same flaws? This is an old trick that is used by anti-death-penalty PC's; force people to look at the past, show the faults etc. For a start who said it would play that way if we brought it back? I wouldn't accept the death penalty brought back under the same old lines. There would have to be safe guards.


I think it is a very valid point, and I'd be interested to hear your ideas on safeguards that could be guaranteed 100% fool proof.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Aug 21 2009, 02:48 PM
Post #164


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Sarah @ Aug 21 2009, 03:37 PM) *
I think it is a very valid point, and I'd be interested to hear your ideas on safeguards that could be guaranteed 100% fool proof.



Well we have cases already that we are 100% sure of: Moor's etc. The ones you mentioned where there was doubt and therefore they should be just put into jail.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Aug 21 2009, 02:51 PM
Post #165


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (GMR @ Aug 21 2009, 03:48 PM) *
Well we have cases already that we are 100% sure of: Moor's etc. The ones you mentioned where there was doubt and therefore they should be just put into jail.

There is always doubt, including sanity. All you would get are cleverer lawyers. I also resent your phrase 'trick'. We use no tricks, we simply refer to the past as a reference. The future will do the same to us.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Aug 21 2009, 02:56 PM
Post #166


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Iommi @ Aug 21 2009, 03:51 PM) *
There is always doubt, including sanity. All you would get are cleverer lawyers. I also resent your phrase 'trick'. We use no tricks, we simply refer to the past as a reference. The future will do the same to us.



Maybe not a trick by you, but by some who like playing semantics.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sarah
post Aug 21 2009, 02:56 PM
Post #167


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 12-July 09
Member No.: 191



QUOTE (GMR @ Aug 21 2009, 03:48 PM) *
Well we have cases already that we are 100% sure of: Moor's etc. The ones you mentioned where there was doubt and therefore they should be just put into jail.



As I thought, you haven't really given the subject much thought.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Aug 21 2009, 02:58 PM
Post #168


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Sarah @ Aug 21 2009, 03:56 PM) *
As I thought, you haven't really given the subject much thought.



I have actually... but if it ever happens it won't be me who decides... or even you.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sarah
post Aug 21 2009, 03:01 PM
Post #169


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 12-July 09
Member No.: 191



QUOTE (GMR @ Aug 21 2009, 03:58 PM) *
I have actually... but if it ever happens it won't be me who decides... or even you.


Thank goodness for that, I had the impression that you thought we should.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Newbury Expat_*
post Aug 21 2009, 03:02 PM
Post #170





Guests






QUOTE (Sarah @ Aug 21 2009, 07:37 AM) *
I think it is a very valid point, and I'd be interested to hear your ideas on safeguards that could be guaranteed 100% fool proof.


Agreed Sarah, a valid point from Rachel.

It could equally be said that it is a common 'trick' (hate that term but it's been used so I'll go with it) of proponents of the death penalty to say "well that's the old system, of course the new one would be better".

Um, how exactly? The penalty is a consequence of a trial and conviction which, being part of the British justice system is not 100%. Safeguards are never completely safe.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Aug 21 2009, 03:03 PM
Post #171


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Newbury Expat @ Aug 21 2009, 04:02 PM) *
Agreed Sarah, a valid point from Rachel.

It could equally be said that it is a common 'trick' (hate that term but it's been used so I'll go with it) of proponents of the death penalty to say "well that's the old system, of course the new one would be better".

Um, how exactly? The penalty is a consequence of a trial and conviction which, being part of the British justice system is not 100%. Safeguards are never completely safe.



But that isn't a good enough reason not to do anything.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Aug 21 2009, 03:07 PM
Post #172


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (GMR @ Aug 21 2009, 04:03 PM) *
But that isn't a good enough reason not to do anything.

But it is good enough (for me) to not have the DP.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Newbury Expat_*
post Aug 21 2009, 03:11 PM
Post #173





Guests






QUOTE (GMR @ Aug 21 2009, 08:03 AM) *
But that isn't a good enough reason not to do anything.


The something I would do is life means life. 'Anything' isn't limited to the death penalty but as that was what was being discussed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Aug 21 2009, 03:20 PM
Post #174


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Iommi @ Aug 21 2009, 04:07 PM) *
But it is good enough (for me) to not have the DP.



But as we have all different views then shouldn't there be a way to allow the majority to decide? And if you voted against it - believing it was wrong - but the majority said yes and we had it at least your conscience would be clear.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Aug 21 2009, 03:21 PM
Post #175


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Newbury Expat @ Aug 21 2009, 04:11 PM) *
The something I would do is life means life. 'Anything' isn't limited to the death penalty but as that was what was being discussed.



I agree life should mean life and that life sentence shouldn't be a soft one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rachel
post Aug 21 2009, 08:37 PM
Post #176


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 151
Joined: 7-August 09
Member No.: 258



Ha ha! I type 21 words, light the touch paper, stand well back & wait for for the fireworks! Now THAT'S wot I call playing Devil's advocate, GMR!!!!!!!!!! But then that's what 'People like me' do tongue.gif I'm sorry, GMR, was too tempting x
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Aug 21 2009, 08:51 PM
Post #177


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Rachel @ Aug 21 2009, 09:37 PM) *
Ha ha! I type 21 words, light the touch paper, stand well back & wait for for the fireworks! Now THAT'S wot I call playing Devil's advocate, GMR!!!!!!!!!! But then that's what 'People like me' do tongue.gif I'm sorry, GMR, was too tempting x



But I agree... and call me Glenn... it is better than saying GMR. There are many ways of playing the Devil's Advocate and your way is just as good as anybody's; but the main point is to see if people bite, as that is the way we judge. Of course such tactics are not everybody's cup of tea and if they don't like your style they usually sulk... but then again if I could please everybody I would be charging myself out to the highest bidder (even better, if I could please User I would be considered a Warlock; i.e. a caster of magical spells) tongue.gif wink.gif

Live long and prosper my friend biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Aug 21 2009, 09:02 PM
Post #178


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (GMR @ Aug 21 2009, 09:51 PM) *
a caster of magical spells) tongue.gif wink.gif

Wasn't that John Wellington Wells?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sarah
post Aug 21 2009, 09:11 PM
Post #179


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 12-July 09
Member No.: 191



QUOTE (Rachel @ Aug 21 2009, 09:37 PM) *
Ha ha! I type 21 words, light the touch paper, stand well back & wait for for the fireworks! Now THAT'S wot I call playing Devil's advocate, GMR!!!!!!!!!! But then that's what 'People like me' do tongue.gif I'm sorry, GMR, was too tempting x


That's why he's no good at it, he can't restrict himself to 21 words. wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Aug 21 2009, 09:20 PM
Post #180


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (JeffG @ Aug 21 2009, 10:02 PM) *
Wasn't that John Wellington Wells?



The sorcerer in the Gilbert & Sullivan’s comic Opera; we are connoisseur my friend... nice to meet a literary mind. wink.gif

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  « < 7 8 9
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 08:24 PM