IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Replacing street lights. Where's the 'saving'?
CrackerJack
post Apr 28 2015, 05:27 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 115
Joined: 2-March 15
Member No.: 10,554



I see WBC are going to be spending £7.24m on replacing the street lights with LED lamps over the next couple of years.

Street light replacement

All well and good and I thought that it was obviously a 'spend now to save in the long term' kind of project. However if this article is to be believed it seems that £7.24m is being spent in order to make savings of £4.87m over the next 25 YEARS! Surely it's more cost effective to just keep the one's we have going if that's the economic basis of this project?

And this is at a time where Councils are increasingly looking at energy savings and floating the prospect of turning street lights off in future years as our ailing power stations struggle to cope.

I know it's probably down to Never look a Gifthorse in the Mouth, but I don't quite get the logic. It's a bloody expensive way of going about making efficiency improvements.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gel
post Apr 28 2015, 05:48 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 948
Joined: 11-September 09
From: Thames Valley
Member No.: 337



Yes Labour Party would call such expenditure an "Investment" of course, but the ROI (Return on Investment) numbers don't stack up.
But they know best and some Chinese LED manufacturer will be most grateful sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MontyPython
post Apr 28 2015, 06:27 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 936
Joined: 16-June 12
Member No.: 8,755



The published returns do appear to be lower than I would have expected.

One of the benefits is supposed to be longer bulb life. My experience of the low energy home bulbs is the claims are grossly exaggerated - and of course the guarantee will not be long and the salesmen will be long gone when we realise that they have not lasted as anticipated!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CrackerJack
post Apr 28 2015, 07:25 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 115
Joined: 2-March 15
Member No.: 10,554



QUOTE (MontyPython @ Apr 28 2015, 07:27 PM) *
One of the benefits is supposed to be longer bulb life. My experience of the low energy home bulbs is the claims are grossly exaggerated - and of course the guarantee will not be long and the salesmen will be long gone when we realise that they have not lasted as anticipated!

Indeed. And if cost benefits are truly being looked at over a 25 year cycle then it's a given that within ten years there will be a new type of lamp column, or lamp unit, or all-singing all-dancing method of lighting streets which make this £7.24m 'investment' entirely redundant.

Another scenario of course is that within ten years Putin or his successors will have turned off our gas supplies and there won't be so much as a spark from our dead power stations to light these expensive bulbs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Apr 28 2015, 08:45 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (MontyPython @ Apr 28 2015, 07:27 PM) *
The published returns do appear to be lower than I would have expected.

One of the benefits is supposed to be longer bulb life. My experience of the low energy home bulbs is the claims are grossly exaggerated - and of course the guarantee will not be long and the salesmen will be long gone when we realise that they have not lasted as anticipated!

Not confusing LED's with CFL's are you MP?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MontyPython
post Apr 28 2015, 09:49 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 936
Joined: 16-June 12
Member No.: 8,755



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Apr 28 2015, 09:45 PM) *
Not confusing LED's with CFL's are you MP?


The lights at home are indeed CFL's - but do we believe that the LEDs will last as long as promised?


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Apr 29 2015, 06:05 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



Sadly, the 'energy saving light bulbs' were sold against a cynical sales claim. The glass bit does indeed last as long, if not longer than the advertised claim. The other bit - which makes it work, doesn't. Mind, they do save a fair amount of energy - so there was no real reason to start the myth. LED light is actually better. However, as you rightly say, in comparitor terms, the cost difference is marginal.

Having lighting, inside and out that operates directly at low voltages is far more useful in that it can make use of local sustainable and stored energy. If you have that sort of infrastructure / equipment in place, there is the advantage of very low operating cost and freedom from the grid. In the meantime, proper switching systems are now avaliable quite economically which enable much finer control of on/off times and permit dimming or switch outs where appropriate - this cuts energy use even more.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gazzadp
post Apr 29 2015, 07:17 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 198
Joined: 29-March 12
Member No.: 8,684



Living beside the A4 in Speen, we have found that the energy saving factors of those LED street lights are quite considerable, as we very rarely need to have any lights on in the back rooms of our property, before this lights were changed I was thinking of installing a security light in our back garden, but we do not need one of them either.

The only downside is that those LED street lights are so bright, I have forgotten what stars in the night sky look like!


--------------------
Obnoxious possiby, VEXATIOUS definitely not.

*****

www.notellingyou.not
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CrackerJack
post Apr 29 2015, 09:06 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 115
Joined: 2-March 15
Member No.: 10,554



Speak to the Council as they can attach a shield to the lamp unit to control the spread of light if it's spilling too much, too strongly into private property.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 01:13 AM