QUOTE (Newbelly @ May 17 2012, 04:31 PM)
I have previously thought whether the crossing should be moved a little towards the rail station to take it a bit away from the junction.
They put crossings in places where there is an obvious 'desire line' to account for the fact that humans are bone idle and can be very dimwitted. If the crossing had been built 20m away from the junction (and even if there had been railings in place which guided people to the crossing and prevented you from just stepping into the road) you would
STILL get far too many who couldn't be bothered with the extra 20m walk and would just climb over the railing so they could go in a straight line to their destination.
On the A4 in Thatcham you have a pedestrian crossing at the junction with Stoney Lane, which leads to Kennet School. At the other end and within 200m (approx?) you have another pedestrian crossing at the Floral Way roundabout which also helps you to get to Francis Baily school... But EVERY school day you get parents parking in the Texaco garage and pulling their kids across the road into the path of moving traffic (and hoping someone will stop) because they can't be bothered with the fag of walking up to the crossing then walking back....
"It's an accident waiting to happen I tell you!"
QUOTE (Berkshirelad @ May 17 2012, 05:16 PM)
What this heavily-used roundabout actually needs - money allowing - is a North-South single lane in each direction bridge for light vehicles. (a bit like the Chiswick flyover).
Why not have a tunnel instead? They could use the pedestrian subways that pedestrians are too scared to use....