IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> A339 between Robin Hood and Sainsburys, is it now a 30?????
motormad
post Apr 14 2016, 08:25 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,970
Joined: 29-December 09
From: Dogging in a car park somewhere
Member No.: 592



So for all the years I've been on the road (8 or 9 now!) this road has been a 40mph limit.
Coming home yesterday I noticed that it's now a 30 limit right up until the Sainsburys Roundabout (if heading towards Newbury Retail Park).
I know they are doing roadworks and wondered if it was just temporary but there are 30mph electronic signs on the lamp posts and I'm thinking that they wouldn't pay for one of those if it was only temporary.. ?


--------------------
:p
Grammar: the difference between knowing your poop and knowing you're poop.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Berkshirelad
post Apr 14 2016, 08:33 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 810
Joined: 13-August 09
Member No.: 271



QUOTE (motormad @ Apr 14 2016, 08:25 AM) *
So for all the years I've been on the road (8 or 9 now!) this road has been a 40mph limit.
Coming home yesterday I noticed that it's now a 30 limit right up until the Sainsburys Roundabout (if heading towards Newbury Retail Park).
I know they are doing roadworks and wondered if it was just temporary but there are 30mph electronic signs on the lamp posts and I'm thinking that they wouldn't pay for one of those if it was only temporary.. ?


It's a temporary limit whilst the roadworks are carried out. Currently, it may well not be necessary but once work starts on the carriageways it will be needed for safety

The electronic signs are the first (and cheapest) step of enforcement. If these fail to slow the traffic then I am guessing that speed cameras will be next.

In my travels on this stretch of road, the 30 limit is more honoured in the breach (although it seems to have slowed most of the traffic to 40 rather than the 50-60 I used to see)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
motormad
post Apr 14 2016, 10:43 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,970
Joined: 29-December 09
From: Dogging in a car park somewhere
Member No.: 592



I can't see how they can justify the 30mph limit though, it wasn't like it earlier in the week? Haha.
Usually they would have the 30mph big signs up but it's not normal to install electronic signs in temporary speed limits?

I fear they are going to reduce the speed limit permanently to 30mph. Which won't be abided by anyway. I've not seen any accidents on this road.


--------------------
:p
Grammar: the difference between knowing your poop and knowing you're poop.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Turin Machine
post Apr 14 2016, 11:31 AM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,682
Joined: 23-September 10
From: In the lower 40
Member No.: 1,104



MM, any idea where I can buy iron x locally?


--------------------
Gammon. And proud!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blackdog
post Apr 14 2016, 02:57 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,945
Joined: 5-June 09
Member No.: 130



QUOTE (motormad @ Apr 14 2016, 11:43 AM) *
I can't see how they can justify the 30mph limit though, it wasn't like it earlier in the week? Haha.
Usually they would have the 30mph big signs up but it's not normal to install electronic signs in temporary speed limits?

I fear they are going to reduce the speed limit permanently to 30mph. Which won't be abided by anyway. I've not seen any accidents on this road.

Pedestrian died crossing there a couple of years back, some would be Lewis Hamilton coming off the roundabout as if his life depended on hitting 70 before he got to the bridge. However, it was not his life that was at stake.

30mph is perfectly reasonable while the roadworks are ongoing - and the sign probably has a switch to change it to 40 after they are finished.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Apr 14 2016, 03:11 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



I thought 30mph was standard practice while road works are taking place; that or big concrete blocks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cognosco
post Apr 14 2016, 06:41 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



QUOTE (blackdog @ Apr 14 2016, 03:57 PM) *
Pedestrian died crossing there a couple of years back, some would be Lewis Hamilton coming off the roundabout as if his life depended on hitting 70 before he got to the bridge. However, it was not his life that was at stake.

30mph is perfectly reasonable while the roadworks are ongoing - and the sign probably has a switch to change it to 40 after they are finished.


I do believe that when the roadworks are finished that doing 30 mph would be wishful thinking? rolleyes.gif


--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
spartacus
post Apr 14 2016, 10:54 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 09
Member No.: 221



QUOTE (motormad @ Apr 14 2016, 09:25 AM) *
but there are 30mph electronic signs on the lamp posts and I'm thinking that they wouldn't pay for one of those if it was only temporary.. ?

A small box built in China, strapped to a lamp column which displays some LED lights at fast cars can be bought for next to nothing. Compared to the costs involved if there was to be a speed related accident in the middle of the roadworks which injured or killed one of the workforce it is peanuts. If it does the job while work on the highway is taking place and there are no incidents then it would be money (small amount) well spent and could be virtually given away or taken to the next site.

QUOTE (Berkshirelad @ Apr 14 2016, 09:33 AM) *
The electronic signs are the first (and cheapest) step of enforcement. If these fail to slow the traffic then I am guessing that speed cameras will be next.

Laws related to installation of new speed cameras still require there to be an accident history involving serious personal injury or death. Apart from the bloke who ran across the road at the canal end instead of using the subway and got hit, and the woman at the Robin Hood end who unfortunately had a epileptic fit while walking on the footpath and fell onto the carriageway and was hit by a passing truck the fatality record and personal injury record on this length of road is very low for an A Class. Speed cameras can't just be set up to make money (although most of us question whether that is true as it doesn't feel like it)

What they could do instead is set up a small tower within the police station grounds, chop back some of the trees alongside and send a young copper up there with a speed device every now and then to photo capture passing speeders.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Berkshirelad
post Apr 15 2016, 08:52 AM
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 810
Joined: 13-August 09
Member No.: 271



QUOTE (spartacus @ Apr 14 2016, 11:54 PM) *
Laws related to installation of new speed cameras still require there to be an accident history involving serious personal injury or death. Apart from the bloke who ran across the road at the canal end instead of using the subway and got hit, and the woman at the Robin Hood end who unfortunately had a epileptic fit while walking on the footpath and fell onto the carriageway and was hit by a passing truck the fatality record and personal injury record on this length of road is very low for an A Class. Speed cameras can't just be set up to make money (although most of us question whether that is true as it doesn't feel like it)



The same restrictions do not apply to the use of SPECS average speed cameras for roadworks - they seem to be the first thing installed for motorway 50mph works limits these days.

Actually, it's always fun to watch people braking for SPECS cameras. Too late you pillock, they face the front of the vehicle usually and calculate AVERAGE speed between the cameras.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Apr 15 2016, 10:39 AM
Post #10


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



I have to say, it is as Spart. says, very cheap and very effective. Even at quiet times, it's not particularly sensible to do much more than 30 along the temporary road surface. Frankly, what has been done there whilst the works are going on is all pretty sensible and does actually keep things moving.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Apr 15 2016, 06:17 PM
Post #11


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (Berkshirelad @ Apr 15 2016, 09:52 AM) *
Actually, it's always fun to watch people braking for SPECS cameras. Too late you pillock, they face the front of the vehicle usually and calculate AVERAGE speed between the cameras.

Do those things actually work or are they just a deterrent banking on people not knowing?
They must surely have to use a fairly sophisticated ANPR system linked to a timer in order to do so?
I have yet to hear of, or know anyone who has been prosecuted using them although I'm sure someone on here will produce an example.

PS If they face the front then my bikes and nearly all other's aint got no front plates!! tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nerc
post Apr 15 2016, 07:15 PM
Post #12


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 148
Joined: 23-November 11
Member No.: 8,319



QUOTE (motormad @ Apr 14 2016, 11:43 AM) *
I can't see how they can justify the 30mph limit though, it wasn't like it earlier in the week? Haha.
Usually they would have the 30mph big signs up but it's not normal to install electronic signs in temporary speed limits?

I fear they are going to reduce the speed limit permanently to 30mph. Which won't be abided by anyway. I've not seen any accidents on this road.


The 30 mph has been there for at least the last 3 weeks (unless you drive with your eyes closed).
There have been at least 3 fatal accidents on the section of road in the past 2 years so i think 30 mph is what it should be kept at.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Apr 15 2016, 08:28 PM
Post #13


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Apr 15 2016, 07:17 PM) *
Do those things actually work or are they just a deterrent banking on people not knowing?
They must surely have to use a fairly sophisticated ANPR system linked to a timer in order to do so?
I have yet to hear of, or know anyone who has been prosecuted using them although I'm sure someone on here will produce an example.

PS If they face the front then my bikes and nearly all other's aint got no front plates!! tongue.gif


No sophistication as far as I know; just a warning, no more, no less. A bit like some burglar alarm cases with a blinking red light; theves don't know if it's fake or real. Most take some notice.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Apr 15 2016, 08:51 PM
Post #14


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (nerc @ Apr 15 2016, 08:15 PM) *
The 30 mph has been there for at least the last 3 weeks (unless you drive with your eyes closed).
There have been at least 3 fatal accidents on the section of road in the past 2 years so i think 30 mph is what it should be kept at.

Two of those (I don't remember the third) were pedestrians in the road: one was crossing the road at what I would call an ill advised position at a busy time of day and while a driver was racing. The other pedestrian unfortunately collapsed into the road while walking on the path next to the road. I'm not sure that justifies a 30.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Apr 15 2016, 09:37 PM
Post #15


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,597
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



Yeah, but, so long as it generates some revenue.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Exhausted
post Apr 15 2016, 10:03 PM
Post #16


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,722
Joined: 4-September 09
Member No.: 320



The centre lanes have been well narrowed and HGV's are not allowed in them which makes for some interesting maneuvers when they get back into the correct lane to go up to the M4 at the Robin Hood.
The real reason for the speed restriction as far as I can see is that there is a great potential for a 'head on' now that the crash barriers have been removed. Even so, two vehicles doing 30mph when they meet will be significant. Two meeting at 40mph or more would be disastrous. I always feel a bit apprehensive trundling down the middle just in case a driver gets pushed or drifts into the oncoming.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
spartacus
post Apr 18 2016, 06:26 PM
Post #17


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 09
Member No.: 221



QUOTE (Exhausted @ Apr 15 2016, 11:03 PM) *
Even so, two vehicles doing 30mph when they meet will be significant. Two meeting at 40mph or more would be disastrous. I always feel a bit apprehensive trundling down the middle just in case a driver gets pushed or drifts into the oncoming.
Even more so than the potential for you to have a 'head-on' on ANY other road? How do you feel when you travel to Hungerford for instance? National speed limit applies (which means quite a few zip along at 80mph)...yet there never has been a central barrier to prevent cars drifting into the opposing lane. Now THAT would be disastrous I agree. The A339 through the road works is pretty mild and if you get twitchy about that then I don't see how you can be confident driving anywhere..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
motormad
post Apr 19 2016, 10:00 AM
Post #18


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,970
Joined: 29-December 09
From: Dogging in a car park somewhere
Member No.: 592



QUOTE (Turin Machine @ Apr 14 2016, 12:31 PM) *
MM, any idea where I can buy iron x locally?


Sorry for delayed response.
Pop down to Nick at DMC - Mention that Jay sent you . smile.gif


--------------------
:p
Grammar: the difference between knowing your poop and knowing you're poop.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Turin Machine
post Apr 19 2016, 10:07 AM
Post #19


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,682
Joined: 23-September 10
From: In the lower 40
Member No.: 1,104



[quote name='motormad' post='109345' date='Apr 19 2016, 11:00 AM']Sorry for delayed response.
Pop down to Nick at DMC - Mention that Jay sent you . smile.gif[/quote
Ah, they do retail sales?


--------------------
Gammon. And proud!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Turin Machine
post Apr 19 2016, 10:11 AM
Post #20


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,682
Joined: 23-September 10
From: In the lower 40
Member No.: 1,104



Cheers MM (Jay)


--------------------
Gammon. And proud!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 11:44 PM