IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> dangerous taxi driver
spartacus
post Aug 7 2009, 08:13 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 09
Member No.: 221



Amongst the news this week I see that the taxi driver who was run over and killed after stepping in front of a motorist who had dared to park in the Hungerford taxi rank is back amongst the living.... rolleyes.gif (page 20 NWN)

QUOTE
Mark Townsend may need an operation on his back following a parking dispute last month.
"I stood on the rank in front of his car. He started to edge his vehicle slowly towards me..... I was talking to the emergency operator when the man got out of the car and pushed me."
He said he was hit by the man's car and was sent flying over the bonnet before landing on his back in the road.

Ambulance, police , first responders and the fire service (WHY?) all attended the scene blocking off the High Street.

Is Mr Townsend a Premiership footballer? All this over the top reaction, rolling about nonsense..... huh.gif Into amateur dramatics? Wants to be the centre of attention then?

"Flying over the bonnet"!! rolleyes.gif

And THEN it goes on to say that he's allergic to painkillers, in constant pain, has trouble moving his leg and is still receiving medical treatment. BUT...he is STILL WORKING!

This fella is still taxi-ing people round on our roads when he's on death's doorstep.... Surely he's a danger and shouldn't be ferrying people round while he's in such terrible shape. The Taxi Driver Association should be telling him to take himself out of service until he's improved. Or the WBC taxi licensing chap should be telling him he can't operate.

What if he was to have an accident and injured his passengers because he got a 'back spasm'?

This is someone who is waiting surgery on a very serious back injury.... It's a DISGRACE!!

signed
Disgusted of Newbury


(Then again.... it may be someone just trying on the compensation route... wink.gif )
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Strafin
post Aug 8 2009, 11:10 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 55



I just read this and it would seem that the Taxi driver wanted the car to move out of the rank, and then tried to stop it from doing so, so as far as I am concerned he deserves everything he gets. I had a couple of Taxi drivers go mental at me once because I parked in front of (not in) their rank, because one of them was parked across the gates to my office, I moved because I feared the situation was going to get me my head kicked in.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roost
post Aug 8 2009, 03:32 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 360
Joined: 13-May 09
Member No.: 31



One word to describe Mr T from this article. 4 letters, starts and ends in 'T' and has 'WA' in the middle followed by as many exclamation marks as deemed appropriate. If a car is driving towards you, common sense (yes, you remember that, don't you?) would suggest GETTING OUT OF THE WAY.....! angry.gif


--------------------
Roost

Welcome to the jungle....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lordtup
post Aug 8 2009, 03:38 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 554
Joined: 27-June 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 164



At the risk of upsetting every taxi driver between here and Vladivostok , I concur that they are collectively the worst drivers on the planet. If you think the 4 wheel drive fraternity are bad then take time out to watch your local cabbie. He either dawdles along as though he has all the time in the world or drives like a lunatic with little or no respect for his fellow drivers.
I know they have at times a difficult job, but they are licenced to drive cars for hire,not to kill.


--------------------
Rem tene verba sequentur
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
regor
post Aug 8 2009, 03:48 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 113
Joined: 29-July 09
From: Thatcham
Member No.: 236



So my mate said to me "I've got the most fantastic bit of kit for my car. It makes it go faster and it helps me get in front of other traffic. I can park anywhere and I never get any speeding tickets any more. It is really magic. You should get one. Here I have a spare, give me £100 and its yours."

So I gave him the money and he handed me.........


An illuminated TAXI sign.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Aug 8 2009, 06:12 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



Seeing as Taxi drivers are so highly respected and your recommendations are of the highest order; where do I sign up to be a taxi driver? wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Aug 8 2009, 06:30 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



They don't wear seat belts either do they?

One question - Why?

(Yes I know the law lets then get away with it - or has it changed?)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Aug 8 2009, 06:56 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



Is there still a law that says London cabbies must carry a bale of hay in the front for the horse? I know there used to be one on the statute books until fairly recently.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Strafin
post Aug 8 2009, 07:04 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 55



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Aug 8 2009, 07:30 PM) *
They don't wear seat belts either do they?

One question - Why?

(Yes I know the law lets then get away with it - or has it changed?)

They're still exempt as far as I can work out
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Strafin
post Aug 8 2009, 07:06 PM
Post #10


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 55



QUOTE (JeffG @ Aug 8 2009, 07:56 PM) *
Is there still a law that says London cabbies must carry a bale of hay in the front for the horse? I know there used to be one on the statute books until fairly recently.

The law was repealed in 1976, so long after the horses were replaced with cars, but not that recent though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GMR
post Aug 8 2009, 08:14 PM
Post #11


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,085
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury, Berkshire.
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Aug 8 2009, 07:30 PM) *
They don't wear seat belts either do they?

One question - Why?

(Yes I know the law lets then get away with it - or has it changed?)



As theory has it; they have to keep getting in and out of the car - but not when it is moving wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Aug 9 2009, 04:37 PM
Post #12


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (Strafin @ Aug 8 2009, 08:04 PM) *
They're still exempt as far as I can work out



Does this mean they are exempt from being seriously hurt in a crash?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Aug 9 2009, 10:31 PM
Post #13


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Aug 9 2009, 05:37 PM) *
Does this mean they are exempt from being seriously hurt in a crash?

It is so they can quickly get out of the vehicle if attacked by passengers. I think they are meant to wear one when not carrying a passenger.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darren
post Aug 10 2009, 08:54 AM
Post #14


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,251
Joined: 15-May 09
Member No.: 61



More at risk of making up-close and personal contact with the windscreen than anything else.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Aug 10 2009, 09:14 AM
Post #15


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (Darren @ Aug 10 2009, 09:54 AM) *
More at risk of making up-close and personal contact with the windscreen than anything else.

Statistically untrue I understand.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Instigator
post Aug 10 2009, 11:19 AM
Post #16


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 7-July 09
From: Berkshire
Member No.: 179



QUOTE (Iommi @ Aug 9 2009, 11:31 PM) *
It is so they can quickly get out of the vehicle if attacked by passengers. I think they are meant to wear one when not carrying a passenger.



That's also the understanding I have.


--------------------
INSTIGATOR
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Aug 10 2009, 11:38 AM
Post #17


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (Darren @ Aug 10 2009, 09:54 AM) *
More at risk of making up-close and personal contact with the windscreen than anything else.



I've seen them not wearing one with an 80 year old granny in the back!

Perhaps she'll hit then with her umbrella. tongue.gif

Lets face it.
They should be made to wear one like the rest of us.
It doesn't take long to unclick a seat belt.

If you and I need to wear one to protect ourselves from injury then so do they.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Aug 10 2009, 11:48 AM
Post #18


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Aug 10 2009, 12:38 PM) *
Lets face it. They should be made to wear one like the rest of us. It doesn't take long to unclick a seat belt. If you and I need to wear one to protect ourselves from injury then so do they.

Are you a taxi driver?

When one is being attacked, the first thing you do is hold your hands up to protect yourself, not fiddle with a seatbelt.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Aug 10 2009, 01:47 PM
Post #19


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (Iommi @ Aug 10 2009, 12:48 PM) *
Are you a taxi driver?

When one is being attacked, the first thing you do is hold your hands up to protect yourself, not fiddle with a seatbelt.


So you're driving along and someone attacks you and the first thing you do is hold your hands up?

In that case you're definitely going to need a seat belt! ohmy.gif

And the answer to your question is no, obviously not.
But I am a driver and I am forced by law to wear a belt for my own protection.
(And a crash helmet when biking). YOU KNOW IT MAKES SENSE!

Anyone can make excuses for not wearing one.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Iommi
post Aug 10 2009, 02:04 PM
Post #20


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 13-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 20



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Aug 10 2009, 02:47 PM) *
So you're driving along and someone attacks you and the first thing you do is hold your hands up?

I don't know, because, like you, I haven't been a taxi driver, nor have I been attacked.

They don't have to, by law, wear one when taking a fare paying passenger. So it makes diddlysquat difference what you or I think. Taxi drivers argued to be excused and legislation was passed to permit this, so I would imagine they argued a reasonable case to get this.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 03:18 AM