IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Sad indictment of Newbury people.
newres
post Nov 22 2017, 04:16 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,549
Joined: 27-November 12
Member No.: 8,961



https://www.newburytoday.co.uk/news/home/22...ntre-plans.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SirWilliam
post Nov 22 2017, 05:29 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 6-March 14
From: West Berks
Member No.: 10,341



Once again a large question mark hangs over the appellation "civilised" as applied to the human race . This is the very attitude that gives oxygen to the fundamentalist's position and can only harden the already widening gulf .


--------------------
Si non prius succederent.......... relinquere
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Nov 23 2017, 07:54 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,819
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



Surely any anonymous response should have been dropped straight in the bin without even reading it? As for the others, they should have been published, with full details, just like any other, hiding them is not the answer. Only defamatory or otherwise considered illegal communications should have been withheld and those put before the Courts. I see this not necessarily an indictment against our society, more a significant failure in our education system, where we now have significant numbers unable to express themselves, let alone think, in a reasonable manner


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TallDarkAndHands...
post Nov 23 2017, 10:03 AM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,165
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (On the edge @ Nov 23 2017, 07:54 AM) *
Surely any anonymous response should have been dropped straight in the bin without even reading it? As for the others, they should have been published, with full details, just like any other, hiding them is not the answer. Only defamatory or otherwise considered illegal communications should have been withheld and those put before the Courts. I see this not necessarily an indictment against our society, more a significant failure in our education system, where we now have significant numbers unable to express themselves, let alone think, in a reasonable manner


Do you mean think in a manner that you find acceptable? People have the right to protest as long as it is legal. Protesting that the area does not have enough parking is not in any way a bad thing.

I would suggest to you as well that most people would not want the establishment next door to them because it would be busy and noisy.
Would you? And be honest...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
newres
post Nov 23 2017, 12:06 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,549
Joined: 27-November 12
Member No.: 8,961



QUOTE (TallDarkAndHandsome @ Nov 23 2017, 10:03 AM) *
Do you mean think in a manner that you find acceptable? People have the right to protest as long as it is legal. Protesting that the area does not have enough parking is not in any way a bad thing.

I would suggest to you as well that most people would not want the establishment next door to them because it would be busy and noisy.
Would you? And be honest...

That's not the issue though. The issue is the language the objectors used.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Nov 23 2017, 01:29 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,819
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (TallDarkAndHandsome @ Nov 23 2017, 10:03 AM) *
Do you mean think in a manner that you find acceptable? People have the right to protest as long as it is legal. Protesting that the area does not have enough parking is not in any way a bad thing.

I would suggest to you as well that most people would not want the establishment next door to them because it would be busy and noisy.
Would you? And be honest...


Yes, of course people have the right to protest BUT if they break the law then they should be prosecuted. We seem to agree on that then.

It is also blindingly obvious to most, that unless a protest is effective, then it's wasted and likely to create the reverse effect.

Your contention that 'most people would not want the establishment next door' is simply ungrounded. I could well argue that only a violently voiciferous (from their communications) poorly educated (from their demonstrable written debating) element would agree with that.

Personally? There are many other noisome ventures I'd not want next door. That includes busy pubs, late service takeaway food shops, people running their own business and using their home as a depot, business premises with garish signage and or illumination. Etc.etc.

So, I wholly agree, if is clear that there will be a significant increase in traffic and parking problems that is certainly worthy of protest. Can you imagine what people would think if I protested against a proposed busy pub venture in the manner suggested here?


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Nov 23 2017, 01:30 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,819
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (newres @ Nov 23 2017, 12:06 PM) *
That's not the issue though. The issue is the language the objectors used.


Spot on.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TallDarkAndHands...
post Nov 23 2017, 08:34 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,165
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (newres @ Nov 23 2017, 12:06 PM) *
That's not the issue though. The issue is the language the objectors used.


I have no qualms about that. If scum don't even put there name to "letters" and then proceed to be islamophobic then a big bonfire should be in order. I would not want pc plod though spending stupid amounts of money trying to track down the said culprits of this "hate crime". Most likely they are either uneducated kids or drunk racists.

I would "hope" that WBC got involved properly with this and granted the rights to build such a said establishment in an undeveloped area where the religious could do what need to in peace without interfering with non believers who want to park.😉
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Nov 23 2017, 10:39 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,728
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (newres @ Nov 23 2017, 12:06 PM) *
That's not the issue though. The issue is the language the objectors used.

But we don't know what was written though. People find the strangest things to get upset about, point in question, headteachers have been told not to call female pupils 'girls' or 'ladies' as it might cause anxiety. Seriously?


--------------------
Like a Boss!! 😎
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TallDarkAndHands...
post Nov 23 2017, 11:29 PM
Post #10


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,165
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (je suis Charlie @ Nov 23 2017, 10:39 PM) *
But we don't know what was written though. People find the strangest things to get upset about, point in question, headteachers have been told not to call female pupils 'girls' or 'ladies' as it might cause anxiety. Seriously?


Femiphobe. I just made a new word up... Or I thought I had.. Not heard it before but it is a word.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Nov 23 2017, 11:41 PM
Post #11


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,728
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (TallDarkAndHandsome @ Nov 23 2017, 11:29 PM) *
Femiphobe. I just made a new word up... Or I thought I had.. Not heard it before but it is a word.

You're actually thinking of genderphobia, it's a new Libtard cause.


--------------------
Like a Boss!! 😎
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
newres
post Nov 24 2017, 05:19 AM
Post #12


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,549
Joined: 27-November 12
Member No.: 8,961



QUOTE (je suis Charlie @ Nov 23 2017, 11:41 PM) *
You're actually thinking of genderphobia, it's a new Libtard cause.

Although its the right wing that have been scientifically shown to be thick so perhaps it should be reactard.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Nov 24 2017, 05:59 AM
Post #13


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,728
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (newres @ Nov 24 2017, 05:19 AM) *
Although its the right wing that have been scientifically shown to be thick so perhaps it should be reactard.

Ahh, or fakescienceaphobia. You really are "Speshul" aren't you. And you think the right are thick, my lord!


--------------------
Like a Boss!! 😎
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Nov 24 2017, 06:12 AM
Post #14


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,890
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (newres @ Nov 24 2017, 07:19 AM) *
Although its the right wing that have been scientifically shown to be thick so perhaps it should be reactard.

Could you direct us to that enlightening piece of research please?
Particularly interested to see if it uses the word "thick".
Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Nov 24 2017, 06:16 AM
Post #15


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,728
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Nov 24 2017, 06:12 AM) *
Could you direct us to that enlightening piece of research please?
Particularly interested to see if it uses the word "thick".
Thanks.

Duh, my name's newres, and I'm Speshul!


--------------------
Like a Boss!! 😎
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
newres
post Nov 24 2017, 06:17 AM
Post #16


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,549
Joined: 27-November 12
Member No.: 8,961



QUOTE (Biker1 @ Nov 24 2017, 06:12 AM) *
Could you direct us to that enlightening piece of research please?
Particularly interested to see if it uses the word "thick".
Thanks.

Its called a synonym. Google it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
newres
post Nov 24 2017, 06:18 AM
Post #17


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,549
Joined: 27-November 12
Member No.: 8,961



QUOTE (je suis Charlie @ Nov 24 2017, 06:16 AM) *
Duh, my name's newres, and I'm Speshul!

Adult.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
je suis Charlie
post Nov 24 2017, 06:25 AM
Post #18


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,728
Joined: 10-January 15
Member No.: 10,530



QUOTE (newres @ Nov 24 2017, 06:18 AM) *
Adult.

"Speshul"


--------------------
Like a Boss!! 😎
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
newres
post Nov 24 2017, 07:44 AM
Post #19


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,549
Joined: 27-November 12
Member No.: 8,961



QUOTE (je suis Charlie @ Nov 24 2017, 06:25 AM) *
"Speshul"

Captain of industry my ****. laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TallDarkAndHands...
post Nov 24 2017, 07:58 AM
Post #20


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,165
Joined: 15-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (newres @ Nov 24 2017, 05:19 AM) *
Although it’s the right wing that have been scientifically shown to be thick so perhaps it should be reactard.

The newres view of the world is simples.

If you don't agree with me you are thick.

Its a bit sad really.

And in other news sleeping beauty is to be banned... As you guessed it the Prince did not obtain permission before kissing her. Sex pest.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th August 2018 - 04:37 AM