 Driver banned for a year after “dangerous” barrier dodge |
  |
 Aug 20 2014, 07:37 PM
Post
#61
|
|
|
Advanced Member  Group: Members Posts: 1,840 Joined: 24-July 09 Member No.: 221  |
QUOTE (On the edge @ Aug 20 2014, 08:01 PM)  ............ why bother you can always trot this stuff out, collect a nice salary and pension for a stress and thought free career. You missed out 'job for life'.... oh and crap loads of holiday.... yeah if it wasn't for having to deal with you numbnut members of public it would be a great job... 
|
 |
 
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 07:43 PM
Post
#62
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 5,064 Joined: 26-May 09 Member No.: 103 |
As I believe has been said before, it's no use just bridging the crossing. That would not alleviate the problem much and instead create even more traffic on that road.
It would have to be part of a complete new Eastern ring road or by-pass.  (Sorry, couldn't help laughing, it's just that's what should have been built in the first place!) Need a complete new road to link the A4 to the A339. |
|
|
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 08:32 PM
Post
#63
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 7,847 Joined: 23-May 09 From: Newbury Member No.: 98 |
QUOTE (Biker1 @ Aug 20 2014, 08:43 PM) As I believe has been said before, it's no use just bridging the crossing. That would not alleviate the problem much and instead create even more traffic on that road. It would have to be part of a complete new Eastern ring road or by-pass. (Sorry, couldn't help laughing, it's just that's what should have been built in the first place!) Need a complete new road to link the A4 to the A339. Depends what problem you are trying to alleviate, as far as the railway is concerned, it eliminates a level crossing, just like little used Ufton....which I seem to remember was originally also said to be 'to hard and too costly'. -------------------- Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 08:38 PM
Post
#64
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 11,902 Joined: 3-September 09 Member No.: 317 |
And as most of us know, the current by-pass was created to alleviate North/South traffic.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 20 2014, 08:53 PM
Post
#65
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 936 Joined: 16-June 12 Member No.: 8,755 |
QUOTE (spartacus @ Aug 20 2014, 08:37 PM) yeah if it wasn't for having to deal with you numbnut members of public it would be a great job... What a lovely attitude - lets hope all those that don't give a stuff about the public are top of the redundancy list. |
|
|
|
|
Aug 21 2014, 05:10 AM
Post
#66
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 5,064 Joined: 26-May 09 Member No.: 103 |
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 20 2014, 09:38 PM) And as most of us know, the current by-pass was created to alleviate North/South traffic. Which is what Thornford road is. Two birds with one stone?? |
|
|
|
|
Aug 21 2014, 09:29 AM
Post
#67
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 11,902 Joined: 3-September 09 Member No.: 317 |
QUOTE (Biker1 @ Aug 21 2014, 06:10 AM) Which is what Thornford road is.Two birds with one stone?? Agreed, but the remit of the by-pass wasn't to alleviate traffic in that area. |
|
|
|
|
Aug 21 2014, 03:55 PM
Post
#68
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 5,064 Joined: 26-May 09 Member No.: 103 |
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 21 2014, 10:29 AM) Agreed, but the remit of the by-pass wasn't to alleviate traffic in that area. Agreed............but it SHOULD have been!! 
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th April 2024 - 10:03 AM |