IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Victoria Park is Good to Go
dannyboy
post May 31 2013, 05:01 PM
Post #21


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (On the edge @ May 31 2013, 05:53 PM) *
laugh.gif

Aaah thanks for that illuminating response! Most of the meat in my Tesco burger was beef!

Any thoughts on what kept the vast majority away from the polling station? Give you a clue, they aren't all over the moon with NDC,



LOL, sure......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MontyPython
post May 31 2013, 05:56 PM
Post #22


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 936
Joined: 16-June 12
Member No.: 8,755



Unfortunately which ever way we vote you we get people (a la Carter and User23) who seem to give no value to public opinion and are keen to fiddle the figures and quotes to justify their personal aims. They also have a tendency to try and undermine anyone who highlights their many failings.

Hence the low turnout at elections.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post May 31 2013, 05:57 PM
Post #23


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (user23 @ May 31 2013, 05:38 PM) *
That's right, whilst the party of the most vocal critic was pushed down to an embarrassing fourth place and last place.

You think it was embarrassing? And to be 'pushed down' would suggest that their position has been higher. I am certain that had those two stood for the two main parties with exactly the same manifesto, they would have come in higher. It's a moot point anyway as most people don't care.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post May 31 2013, 06:25 PM
Post #24


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ May 31 2013, 06:57 PM) *
You think it was embarrassing? And to be 'pushed down' would suggest that their position has been higher. I am certain that had those two stood for the two main parties with exactly the same manifesto, they would have come in higher. It's a moot point anyway as most people don't care.
They were third before, they came fourth in the latest election. That's a drop of one place, to last.

Yiu should probably post something about a straw man next.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post May 31 2013, 06:38 PM
Post #25


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (user23 @ May 31 2013, 07:25 PM) *
Yiu should probably post something about a straw man next.

Only if you post something with your almost customary user23 'twist of the truth'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post May 31 2013, 06:44 PM
Post #26


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



QUOTE (user23 @ May 31 2013, 05:38 PM) *
That's right, whilst the party of the most vocal critic was pushed down to an embarrassing fourth place and last place.

You've lost me. Are you talking about the Victoria ward election just gone? I don't remember Labour saying much at all to criticise the Town Council, though I may be mistaken, and Labour finished sixth and last, it was a Tory who came in fourth.



--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post May 31 2013, 06:49 PM
Post #27


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



QUOTE (dannyboy @ May 31 2013, 12:31 PM) *
Not to mention the significant sum spent in Goldwell Park.

You're usually pretty good with things like this - but isn't Goldwell Park owned and managed by WBC and not NTC? And not that it has any bearing, but isn't the work going on in Goldwell Park to do with the Newbury Flood Alleviation Scheme, so mainly funded by the Environment Agency and nothing to do with amenity and leisure?


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post May 31 2013, 06:54 PM
Post #28


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (Simon Kirby @ May 31 2013, 07:49 PM) *
You're usually pretty good with things like this - but isn't Goldwell Park owned and managed by WBC and not NTC? And not that it has any bearing, but isn't the work going on in Goldwell Park to do with the Newbury Flood Alleviation Scheme, so mainly funded by the Environment Agency and nothing to do with amenity and leisure?

I don't care who runs the park. As you are so keen to point out NTC get their cash via WBC....

At the end of the day the local 'powers that be' have completely replaced the kids / todlers play area adjacent to the recreation centre. They even replaced the fence around it. That last little tit bit alone should have had the nay sayers champing at the bit.

The flood alleviation work in the park is at a standstill because, err, the water levels have been to high. But I notice that the EA has dumped about 200 tonnes of imported cobbles into the Kennet just by the Sally Army charity shop in the last week. Looks superb. Not.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post May 31 2013, 06:58 PM
Post #29


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



QUOTE (dannyboy @ May 31 2013, 07:54 PM) *
I don't care who runs the park. As you are so keen to point out NTC get their cash from WBC, so it is all the same cash.

At the end of the day the local 'powers that be' have completely replaced the kids / todlers play area adjacent to the recreation centre. They even replaced the fence around it. That last little tit bit alone should have had the nay sayers champing at the bit.

The flood alleviation work in the park is at a standstill because, err, the water levels have been to high. But I notice that the EA has dumped about 200 tonnes of imported cobbles into the Kennet just by the Sally Army charity shop in the last week. Looks superb. Not.

I hear your pain, but I don't see what any of that has to do with the potential maladministration of the cracks snafu.

On the Kennet thing - I understand the cobbles are temporary just to provide a working platform, though I may be wrong.


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post May 31 2013, 07:02 PM
Post #30


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (Simon Kirby @ May 31 2013, 07:58 PM) *
I hear your pain, but I don't see what any of that has to do with the potential maladministration of the cracks snafu.

On the Kennet thing - I understand the cobbles are temporary just to provide a working platform, though I may be wrong.

nothing at all to do with your op. to post anything in reply to that would be futile. you know best.



it does have to do with other posts made after though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post May 31 2013, 07:08 PM
Post #31


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Simon Kirby @ May 31 2013, 07:44 PM) *
You've lost me. Are you talking about the Victoria ward election just gone? I don't remember Labour saying much at all to criticise the Town Council, though I may be mistaken, and Labour finished sixth and last, it was a Tory who came in fourth.

I suspect user23 now is busy dreaming up some distorted truth to back up his claim.

This is how I understand the last two elections went in Victoria. Getting information is a little tricky from our rather dour local websites. It would seem that the winners of the 2013 election received roughly half the votes of the out-going councillors.

2013
PAYTON, Alexander (Lib Dem) – 335 votes – Elected
UDUWERAGE-PERERA, Ruwan (Lib Dem) – 315 votes – Elected
BOWLER, Malcolm (Con) – 292 votes
FAIRBROTHER, Stuart (Con) – 279 votes
FARROW Charlie (Apolitical) 158 votes
BUTLER, Kate (Lab) – 148 votes
YATES, David (Apolitical) 136 votes
PUFFETT, Gary (Lab) 130 votes


2011
ALLEN David Liberal Democrats ELECTED 696
BANSAL Mukesh Liberal Democrats ELECTED 621
SALTER Liz Liberal Democrats ELECTED 600
O'KEEFFE Elizabeth Liberal Democrats ELECTED 589
BASTIEN Pauline Conservatives NOT ELECTED 516
MOFFAT David Conservative NOT ELECTED 512
HANCOCK Pearl Conservatives NOT ELECTED 442
SMITHSON June Conservatives NOT ELECTED 437
SEMPLE Sean Robert Labour Party NOT ELECTED 184
REID David Apolitical Democrats NOT ELECTED 140
WALLACE Iain Robert Michael Apolitical Democrats NOT ELECTED 107
BELL Aaron Kristopher Apolitical Democrats NOT ELECTED 98
FARROW Alexander Apolitical Democrats NOT ELECTED 98
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post May 31 2013, 07:23 PM
Post #32


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (dannyboy @ May 31 2013, 08:02 PM) *
nothing at all to do with your op. to post anything in reply to that would be futile. you know best.



it does have to do with other posts made after though.
I don't think it's sunk in that this sort of thread is driving away new punters from this place.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post May 31 2013, 07:25 PM
Post #33


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (dannyboy @ May 31 2013, 08:02 PM) *
nothing at all to do with your op. to post anything in reply to that would be futile. you know best.

A candid and sincere opinion would do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post May 31 2013, 07:26 PM
Post #34


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (user23 @ May 31 2013, 08:23 PM) *
I don't think it's sunk in that this sort of thread is driving away new punters from this place.

And that is a fact is it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post May 31 2013, 07:32 PM
Post #35


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ May 31 2013, 08:25 PM) *
A candid and sincere opinion would do.

okay, I'll say it again -



IMHO - a study was done, at the behest of residents, posters on this very forum & NTC itseslf.

but and ( no surprise here ) it was inconclusive. It it had been cast iron, NTC would have managed to extract, as Costain had done with the groundwater, compo from the contactor responsible.

Because a multi million £ contractor can hire better lawyers that a tin pot local council the case is closed.

pretty straight forward & bleeding obvious.

no cloak & dagger, no deals & no snafu.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post May 31 2013, 07:40 PM
Post #36


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



* sorry, off topic *


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MontyPython
post May 31 2013, 07:43 PM
Post #37


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 936
Joined: 16-June 12
Member No.: 8,755



QUOTE (dannyboy @ May 31 2013, 08:32 PM) *
okay, I'll say it again -



IMHO - a study was done, at the behest of residents, posters on this very forum & NTC itseslf.

but and ( no surprise here ) it was inconclusive. .......



Where is your evidence for this?

and if this is the case NTC can publish the report, and many on here will. albiet with some regret that evidence could not be found, accept the report.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post May 31 2013, 07:46 PM
Post #38


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (MontyPython @ May 31 2013, 08:43 PM) *
Where is your evidence for this?

and if this is the case NTC can publish the report, and many on here will. albiet with some regret that evidence could not be found, accept the report.

like every other post on this forum - it is an educated guess.

none of us are privy to any info of merit, so all we can do is poke around in the dark.....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
user23
post May 31 2013, 07:52 PM
Post #39


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 4,025
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (dannyboy @ May 31 2013, 08:46 PM) *
like every other post on this forum - it is an educated guess.
Like a straw man?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post May 31 2013, 07:55 PM
Post #40


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (dannyboy @ May 31 2013, 08:32 PM) *
pretty straight forward & bleeding obvious. no cloak & dagger, no deals & no snafu.

Except a council that will not admit to it. Although it seems to me rather strange that data that show nothing conclusivel should be kept secret.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd September 2024 - 09:04 PM