Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Newbury News
English Spelling |
|
|
|
Aug 3 2012, 11:10 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 2,945
Joined: 5-June 09
Member No.: 130
|
Our esteemed star headmaster (whose name will probably also appear as 4 stars). Paul **** has spoken out about children reading books with US spellings: http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/2012/focus-o...ire-headteacherOne of the words criticised was a totally invented word ‘ahold’. Now it is self evident that all words are totally invented - or we wouldn't have them. So the implication that is that the author of the offending book had made it up as he or she wrote it. Mr **** needs to do his homework! The earliest recorded use of 'ahold' (according to the reputable Merriman-Webster dictionary) was in 1855. A great many words have been invented since 1855 - perhaps Mr **** would also like us not to use new-fangled words like 'computer', 'aircraft', 'internet' or 'super-head'.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 07:49 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103
|
QUOTE (blackdog @ Aug 4 2012, 12:10 AM) Our esteemed star headmaster (whose name will probably also appear as 4 stars). Paul **** has spoken out about children reading books with US spellings: http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/2012/focus-o...ire-headteacherOne of the words criticised was a totally invented word ‘ahold’. Shouldn't that be criticized?
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 09:25 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56
|
QUOTE (blackdog @ Aug 4 2012, 12:10 AM) The earliest recorded use of 'ahold' (according to the reputable Merriman-Webster dictionary) was in 1855. Merriam-Webster (sic) is an American dictionary. It may well be reputable in the USA.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 09:31 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (JeffG @ Aug 4 2012, 10:25 AM) Merriam-Webster (sic) is an American dictionary. It may well be reputable in the USA. It's reputable worldwide.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 10:39 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 456
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 47
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Aug 4 2012, 10:31 AM) It's reputable worldwide. Wasn't it American books that D*cks was complaining about though? (and, by extension, the gradual 'Americanisation' of our language?
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 10:57 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56
|
QUOTE (Squelchy @ Aug 4 2012, 11:39 AM) Wasn't it American books that D*cks was complaining about though? Yes, and specifically in primary schools, where children may not have enough experience of language to understand the differences.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 11:07 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 4 2012, 12:02 PM) I think TV and film will have a greater impact on modern language (and behaviour) than any book. Just as they have through the ages.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 11:10 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (Squelchy @ Aug 4 2012, 11:39 AM) Wasn't it American books that D*cks was complaining about though? (and, by extension, the gradual 'Americanisation' of our language? Read Bryson's Made in America - a good linguistics primer. The Amercians might have something to say about us damaging the language the founding fathers took with them. Great thing about English, it evolves and so it surves.
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 11:12 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 4 2012, 12:02 PM) I think TV and film will have a greater impact on modern language (and behaviour) than any book. Yes, and it's sad to know that many children do not have access to books in their own homes. Incidentally, while browsing, I came across this: QUOTE The equivilent of 600,000 pupils shun books altogether and a quarter study only one novel during the average school year, it was disclosed. Teachers are increasingly dependant on bite-sized extracts – rather than whole books – to meet the demands of the National Curriculum and school tests, researchers said. And this is coming from the Telegraph's Education Editor!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 11:26 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 4 2012, 12:02 PM) I think TV and film will have a greater impact on modern language (and behaviour) than any book. Language maybe, but spelling?
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 11:35 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Aug 4 2012, 12:26 PM) Language maybe, but spelling? QUOTE (Squelchy @ Aug 4 2012, 11:39 AM) Wasn't it American books that D*cks was complaining about though? (and, by extension, the gradual 'Americanisation' of our language?
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 11:57 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Aug 4 2012, 12:44 PM) Yes,
but films use the same sounding language - such as colour & color but it is books which will teach kids to spell incorrectly...... TV and Film bring new words (which was another thing being complained of in the OP) and usage, but I'd also suggest that an Internet browser will have a greater impact on spelling than books. ****, just broke my curfew... I'm going off to find something less pompous to do.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 01:27 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 4 2012, 12:57 PM) TV and Film bring new words (which was another thing being complained of in the OP) and usage, but I'd also suggest that an Internet browser will have a greater impact on spelling than books.
****, just broke my curfew... I'm going off to find something less pompous to do. Been trying on caps then?
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 01:39 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51
|
QUOTE (On the edge @ Aug 4 2012, 02:25 PM) Mark Twain had a good view on spelling. Internet browsers are likely to have a reverse effect - fuzzy logic defeats our old 'like for like' matching. Shakespeare, George V and a whole long list couldn't spell. In the spirit of the thread, I'd suggest that there are other things to worry about - such as getting our kids used to using more than one language. You mean like English & Polari?
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 02:45 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98
|
QUOTE (dannyboy @ Aug 4 2012, 02:39 PM) You mean like English & Polari? Ho.Ho. such wit!
--------------------
Know your place!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 4 2012, 06:34 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392
|
QUOTE (Dodgys smarter brother. @ Aug 4 2012, 06:12 PM) "English? Who needs that? I'm never going to England! "
Homer J. Simpson. Ah yes good old Homer J, where would we be without the scion of Shakespeare.
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|