IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> English Spelling
blackdog
post Aug 3 2012, 11:10 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,945
Joined: 5-June 09
Member No.: 130



Our esteemed star headmaster (whose name will probably also appear as 4 stars). Paul **** has spoken out about children reading books with US spellings:
http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/2012/focus-o...ire-headteacher

One of the words criticised was a totally invented word ‘ahold’.

Now it is self evident that all words are totally invented - or we wouldn't have them. So the implication that is that the author of the offending book had made it up as he or she wrote it. Mr **** needs to do his homework! The earliest recorded use of 'ahold' (according to the reputable Merriman-Webster dictionary) was in 1855. A great many words have been invented since 1855 - perhaps Mr **** would also like us not to use new-fangled words like 'computer', 'aircraft', 'internet' or 'super-head'.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Biker1
post Aug 4 2012, 07:49 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 5,064
Joined: 26-May 09
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (blackdog @ Aug 4 2012, 12:10 AM) *
Our esteemed star headmaster (whose name will probably also appear as 4 stars). Paul **** has spoken out about children reading books with US spellings:
http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/2012/focus-o...ire-headteacher

One of the words criticised was a totally invented word ‘ahold’.

Shouldn't that be criticized? wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Aug 4 2012, 09:25 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (blackdog @ Aug 4 2012, 12:10 AM) *
The earliest recorded use of 'ahold' (according to the reputable Merriman-Webster dictionary) was in 1855.

Merriam-Webster (sic) is an American dictionary. It may well be reputable in the USA.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Aug 4 2012, 09:31 AM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (JeffG @ Aug 4 2012, 10:25 AM) *
Merriam-Webster (sic) is an American dictionary. It may well be reputable in the USA.


It's reputable worldwide.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Squelchy
post Aug 4 2012, 10:39 AM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 456
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 47



QUOTE (On the edge @ Aug 4 2012, 10:31 AM) *
It's reputable worldwide.


Wasn't it American books that D*cks was complaining about though? (and, by extension, the gradual 'Americanisation' of our language?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Aug 4 2012, 10:57 AM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (Squelchy @ Aug 4 2012, 11:39 AM) *
Wasn't it American books that D*cks was complaining about though?

Yes, and specifically in primary schools, where children may not have enough experience of language to understand the differences.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Aug 4 2012, 11:02 AM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



I think TV and film will have a greater impact on modern language (and behaviour) than any book.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Aug 4 2012, 11:07 AM
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 4 2012, 12:02 PM) *
I think TV and film will have a greater impact on modern language (and behaviour) than any book.


Just as they have through the ages. laugh.gif


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Aug 4 2012, 11:10 AM
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Squelchy @ Aug 4 2012, 11:39 AM) *
Wasn't it American books that D*cks was complaining about though? (and, by extension, the gradual 'Americanisation' of our language?


Read Bryson's Made in America - a good linguistics primer. The Amercians might have something to say about us damaging the language the founding fathers took with them. Great thing about English, it evolves and so it surves.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Aug 4 2012, 11:12 AM
Post #10


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 4 2012, 12:02 PM) *
I think TV and film will have a greater impact on modern language (and behaviour) than any book.

Yes, and it's sad to know that many children do not have access to books in their own homes.

Incidentally, while browsing, I came across this:
QUOTE
The equivilent of 600,000 pupils shun books altogether and a quarter study only one novel during the average school year, it was disclosed.
Teachers are increasingly dependant on bite-sized extracts – rather than whole books – to meet the demands of the National Curriculum and school tests, researchers said.


And this is coming from the Telegraph's Education Editor!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post Aug 4 2012, 11:26 AM
Post #11


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 4 2012, 12:02 PM) *
I think TV and film will have a greater impact on modern language (and behaviour) than any book.

Language maybe, but spelling?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Aug 4 2012, 11:35 AM
Post #12


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (dannyboy @ Aug 4 2012, 12:26 PM) *
Language maybe, but spelling?

QUOTE (Squelchy @ Aug 4 2012, 11:39 AM) *
Wasn't it American books that D*cks was complaining about though? (and, by extension, the gradual 'Americanisation' of our language?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post Aug 4 2012, 11:44 AM
Post #13


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



Yes,

but films use the same sounding language - such as colour & color but it is books which will teach kids to spell incorrectly......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Aug 4 2012, 11:57 AM
Post #14


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (dannyboy @ Aug 4 2012, 12:44 PM) *
Yes,

but films use the same sounding language - such as colour & color but it is books which will teach kids to spell incorrectly......

TV and Film bring new words (which was another thing being complained of in the OP) and usage, but I'd also suggest that an Internet browser will have a greater impact on spelling than books.

****, just broke my curfew... I'm going off to find something less pompous to do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Aug 4 2012, 01:25 PM
Post #15


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



Mark Twain had a good view on spelling. Internet browsers are likely to have a reverse effect - fuzzy logic defeats our old 'like for like' matching. Shakespeare, George V and a whole long list couldn't spell. In the spirit of the thread, I'd suggest that there are other things to worry about - such as getting our kids used to using more than one language.


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Aug 4 2012, 01:27 PM
Post #16


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Aug 4 2012, 12:57 PM) *
TV and Film bring new words (which was another thing being complained of in the OP) and usage, but I'd also suggest that an Internet browser will have a greater impact on spelling than books.

****, just broke my curfew... I'm going off to find something less pompous to do.


Been trying on caps then? tongue.gif


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dannyboy
post Aug 4 2012, 01:39 PM
Post #17


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,056
Joined: 14-May 09
From: Bouvetøya
Member No.: 51



QUOTE (On the edge @ Aug 4 2012, 02:25 PM) *
Mark Twain had a good view on spelling. Internet browsers are likely to have a reverse effect - fuzzy logic defeats our old 'like for like' matching. Shakespeare, George V and a whole long list couldn't spell. In the spirit of the thread, I'd suggest that there are other things to worry about - such as getting our kids used to using more than one language.

You mean like English & Polari?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
On the edge
post Aug 4 2012, 02:45 PM
Post #18


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 7,847
Joined: 23-May 09
From: Newbury
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (dannyboy @ Aug 4 2012, 02:39 PM) *
You mean like English & Polari?


Ho.Ho. such wit! laugh.gif


--------------------
Know your place!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dodgys smarter b...
post Aug 4 2012, 05:12 PM
Post #19


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 462
Joined: 20-September 10
Member No.: 1,100



"English? Who needs that? I'm never going to England! "

Homer J. Simpson.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penelope
post Aug 4 2012, 06:34 PM
Post #20


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392



QUOTE (Dodgys smarter brother. @ Aug 4 2012, 06:12 PM) *
"English? Who needs that? I'm never going to England! "

Homer J. Simpson.


Ah yes good old Homer J, where would we be without the scion of Shakespeare.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 03:57 AM