IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> NTC and Political Discrimination
Andy Capp
post Mar 15 2012, 10:28 AM
Post #41


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Penelope @ Mar 14 2012, 10:41 PM) *
This is the kind of bigoted, misinformed nonsense that we are used to, my little misspelling friend.
QUOTE (Phil_D11102 @ Mar 15 2012, 03:23 AM) *
No to you my grammar police little "friend". The person you seem to be defending has no issue protecting his own (and his party) instead of looking after the people who put him into the position he now holds.

Would you both please take this discussion somewhere else? Many thanks. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penelope
post Mar 15 2012, 12:09 PM
Post #42


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Mar 15 2012, 10:28 AM) *
Would you both please take this discussion somewhere else? Many thanks. smile.gif

yes Sir, Sorry Sir, won't happen again Sir.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nothing Much
post Mar 15 2012, 03:12 PM
Post #43


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,690
Joined: 16-July 11
Member No.: 6,171



Strangely enough I hopped on a bus to a garden center yesterday.
Walking back I came upon a Benyon Estates sign.

Only about 2 miles from my neck of the woods. Intrigued was I.
Seems the family trusts or whatever owns a lot of the area I was in.
300 houses on leaseholds. Very well cared for area....So a plus for that.
£1.5m for most if they went on the market. Lucky lad.
Never knew of the local connection.

So despite having to look after a younger wife and a sprog, and a Dad.
He should have time to care for a constituent.

Well he is obviously richer than I am so bung him in the Tower.
ce
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blackdog
post Mar 15 2012, 06:22 PM
Post #44


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,945
Joined: 5-June 09
Member No.: 130



QUOTE (Nothing Much @ Mar 15 2012, 03:12 PM) *
So despite having to look after a younger wife and a sprog, and a Dad.

Five kids. But he has siblings to help with dad.

I quite often walk the dogs on Benyon land - they are much, much, better than most local landowners when it comes to public access.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cognosco
post Mar 15 2012, 07:29 PM
Post #45


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



QUOTE (blackdog @ Mar 15 2012, 06:22 PM) *
Five kids. But he has siblings to help with dad.

I quite often walk the dogs on Benyon land - they are much, much, better than most local landowners when it comes to public access.


Is he any good at ensuring local people are allowed to continue to have free speech in spite of the efforsts of a local rogue council though? rolleyes.gif


--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Mar 15 2012, 07:46 PM
Post #46


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (Cognosco @ Mar 15 2012, 07:29 PM) *
Is he any good at ensuring local people are allowed to continue to have free speech in spite of the efforsts of a local rogue council though? rolleyes.gif

Well we won't know unless Simon contacts him, will we?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post Mar 20 2012, 02:08 PM
Post #47


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



Don't suppose anyone knows whether the Council passed the Resolution last night which would allow them to refuse me a new tenancy?

Probably time I posted the gagging clauses - this is what the Council wanted me to sign in order for them to offer me a new tenancy. I didn't sign and that's why they needed last night's Resolution.
QUOTE ("Newbury Town Council")
Simon Kirby agrees to:

c. Cease to make postings and pronouncements in public places (including in particular notice boards and e-forums) that are critical of or negative towards Newbury Town Council, its Members, Employees, Contractors, Customers, Tenants, and other associates, without prior discussion with the Chief Executive Officer of Newbury Town Council.

d. Not to cause nuisance to Newbury Town Council, its Members, Employees, Contractors, Customers, Tenant and other associates and in particular not to take action that entails inordinate amount of time to be spent by Newbury Town Council Members and Officers for no real benefit.

Newbury Town Council and Simon Kirby agree to keep the terms of this Agreement strictly confidential and agree not to disclose, communicate or otherwise make public the same to anyone (save professional advisers), or for the enforcement of the terms of this Agreement and otherwise as may be required to be disclosed by law.


If you've missed it this is the gist of Article 10 of the Human Rights Act that guarantees freedom of expression.
QUOTE
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by a public authority and regardless of frontiers.

And Section 6 of the act makes it unlawful for a council to do anything (or indeed fail to do anything) which interferes with that right.


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Mar 20 2012, 02:20 PM
Post #48


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



Drawing from what I have seen and heard of them, I think the Newbury Town Council are a bunch of spineless self-serving hypocrites. This applies to both the Tories and Lib Dem members, and I can't wait for the opportunity to tell them so face to face, come election time.







... unless they voted down the resolution of course! tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_xjay1337_*
post Mar 20 2012, 02:28 PM
Post #49





Guests






What is terms a) and b,)?

What a bunch of nobbers. (I like that word now)
I think fair play to you for arguing your corner, obviously you have them all a-flustered.
Even though you openly wear a hat like an Australian and wear shorts more often than trousers, in this instance you are quite cool.

I would be very surprised if they did actually now force you out. And if they did, I think a Newbury Weekly News article, not to mention national papers, would be very interested in what you have to say. Plus you could sell your story for a few pounds, perhaps treat the family to a dinner of something other than Cabbage.

smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post Mar 20 2012, 04:10 PM
Post #50


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



QUOTE (xjay1337 @ Mar 20 2012, 02:28 PM) *
What is terms a) and b,)?

I didn't mention them as they weren't anatomically possible.

QUOTE (xjay1337 @ Mar 20 2012, 02:28 PM) *
What a bunch of nobbers. (I like that word now)
I think fair play to you for arguing your corner, obviously you have them all a-flustered.
Even though you openly wear a hat like an Australian and wear shorts more often than trousers, in this instance you are quite cool.

I would be very surprised if they did actually now force you out. And if they did, I think a Newbury Weekly News article, not to mention national papers, would be very interested in what you have to say. Plus you could sell your story for a few pounds, perhaps treat the family to a dinner of something other than Cabbage.

smile.gif

I like that word too now.


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post Mar 20 2012, 04:56 PM
Post #51


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Mar 20 2012, 02:20 PM) *
Drawing from what I have seen and heard of them, I think the Newbury Town Council are a bunch of spineless self-serving hypocrites. This applies to both the Tories and Lib Dem members, and I can't wait for the opportunity to tell them so face to face, come election time.

... unless they voted down the resolution of course! tongue.gif

Thank you. I don't think they're in any mood to be conciliatory, they're just getting ready to evict me. I made an effort over the weekend to start discussions with a councillor but it seems they want some kind of capitulation from me before they'll even talk to me, and I can't think what I have left that they could want so that just got nowhere. I mean, they're evicting me for goodness sake.

All of this current dispute, the court case, everything, is all because the Council couldn't acknowledge they'd been wrong.

Early 2010 the Council acknowledged that the rent review term was unfair because they cooperated with Trading Standards and changed the Tenancy Agreement. This is what Trading Standards said:

QUOTE ("Trading Standards")
I spoke to our legal representative yesterday and she is of the opinion that the 'rent review term' in the old agreement was itself not unfair, what made it unfair was the lack of ability to withdraw from the contract without penalty, ie you had to give 12 months notice and pay the higher price in the meantime.

and
QUOTE ("Trading Standards")
The old agreement, we agreed was unfair, but was changed to comply with the legislation. (If they had not changed it WBC could have applied for a civil injunction to prevent The Council from using the term).

and this is what the Town Council said about the new Tenancy Agreement
QUOTE ("Town Council")
Following concerns raised by an allotment tenant to West Berkshire Council Trading Standards, Newbury Town Council has agreed to make a number of changes to the Allotment Rental Agreement and Allotment Rules. Those changes have been agreed with Trading Standards, discussed with the Stewards, and ratified by the Town Council at its Community Services Committee meeting on 26 July 2010.


And that should have been an end to it. I had witheld £20 of rent because the increase was unlawful, but we all agreed that now and we should all have moved on. I should have been offered the new agreement along with the other 500 of Newbury's allotmenteers, and the Town Council might have usefully reflected how it would have been better to have discussed the issue sensibly in the first place.

What actually happened was that the Council offered me the new agreement pre-evicted on 13 December 2010. Here's the agreement they offered me, with the rider added in biro.
[attachment=114:Allotmen...greement.jpg]

Obviously I wasn't going sit idle and be evicted so I've had to fight on ever since, but if the Council had just shown some honesty and accountability two years ago none of this would ever have followed. Of course the Council couldn't evict me on 13 December because the rent review term was unlawful, so February 2011 they revoke it and make it a Notice to Quit 1 April 2012, and to challenge that I need the minutes of the meeting where they decided that, and they wouldn't let me have the minutes so I made a complaint to the police, etc, etc.


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penelope
post Mar 20 2012, 05:02 PM
Post #52


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392



I am, frankly, disgusted, dismayed And incensed in equal measure. what a bunch of self serving fat weasels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post Mar 20 2012, 05:05 PM
Post #53


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



QUOTE (Penelope @ Mar 20 2012, 05:02 PM) *
I am, frankly, disgusted, dismayed And incensed in equal measure. what a bunch of self serving fat weasels.

Thank you. (though easy on the weasels, they're really very cute if you're not a mouse!).


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Mar 20 2012, 05:23 PM
Post #54


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



Meanwhile; the Newbury Town 'Lodge' can all sit round patting themselves on the back for a job badly done.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cognosco
post Mar 20 2012, 06:17 PM
Post #55


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 2,452
Joined: 31-October 10
Member No.: 1,212



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Mar 20 2012, 05:23 PM) *
Meanwhile; the Newbury Town 'Lodge' can all sit round patting themselves on the back for a job badly done.


The only honourable thing left for the council to do is to resign enmass. How can they possibly be expected to face the local taxpayers after such underhanded and utterly despicable actions. For even contemplating this gagging order let alone issuing it, there must be immediate action taken against them! angry.gif




--------------------
Vexatious Candidate?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Mar 20 2012, 06:53 PM
Post #56


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Cognosco @ Mar 20 2012, 06:17 PM) *
The only honourable thing left for the council to do is to resign enmass. How can they possibly be expected to face the local taxpayers after such underhanded and utterly despicable actions. For even contemplating this gagging order let alone issuing it, there must be immediate action taken against them! angry.gif

I seriously think 'the Chair' or the CEO should go. They preside over a council that appears to me to be morally bankrupt.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penelope
post Mar 20 2012, 06:55 PM
Post #57


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392



How about a Facebook campaign ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Simon Kirby
post Mar 20 2012, 06:59 PM
Post #58


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 6,326
Joined: 20-July 10
From: Wash Common
Member No.: 1,011



QUOTE (Penelope @ Mar 20 2012, 06:55 PM) *
How about a Facebook campaign ?

I guess I need to try everything now. I'm not on Facebook and don't really know anything about it so I'll have to have a look. Thanks.


--------------------
Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andy Capp
post Mar 20 2012, 07:09 PM
Post #59


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 11,902
Joined: 3-September 09
Member No.: 317



QUOTE (Simon Kirby @ Mar 20 2012, 06:59 PM) *
I guess I need to try everything now. I'm not on Facebook and don't really know anything about it so I'll have to have a look. Thanks.

Is there any national allotmenteers support group of any kind?

And while I'm at it, I'd like to say to the local bottlers allotmenteers that might be reading. It might be Simon Kirby, now, but you might be next, and look-out for those silencing clauses in the next contract you sign!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penelope
post Mar 20 2012, 07:43 PM
Post #60


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 865
Joined: 8-December 11
From: Not Here anymore!
Member No.: 8,392



QUOTE (Andy Capp @ Mar 20 2012, 07:09 PM) *
Is there any national allotmenteers support group of any kind?

And while I'm at it, I'd like to say to the local bottlers allotmenteers that might be reading. It might be Simon Kirby, now, but you might be next, and look-out for those silencing clauses in the next contract you sign!


Like Simon I'm a Facebook newbie. But there must be someone out there who can organise this, if of course they are interested in justice.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

8 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 01:46 AM