IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> newburytoday.co.uk images
massifheed
post Dec 10 2010, 01:33 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 443
Joined: 1-November 10
Member No.: 1,215



This isn't really a rant as such, just more of a puzzled observation. Why is that often the images that accompany an article on the newbury today website are either of a really low resolution and have been blown up so that they are all pixelated, or they have been resized wierdly so that the image is all stretched - like here:

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/Article...articleID=15358

It's not as if it's a major thing to resize an image correctly.

Strange, no?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darren
post Dec 10 2010, 01:41 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,251
Joined: 15-May 09
Member No.: 61



Resized, but failed to tick the 'constrain proportions' box. Beginners error with a photo management tool.

Either that or the subject are all strangely shaped?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
massifheed
post Dec 10 2010, 01:52 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 443
Joined: 1-November 10
Member No.: 1,215



QUOTE (Darren @ Dec 10 2010, 01:41 PM) *
Resized, but failed to tick the 'constrain proportions' box. Beginners error with a photo management tool.


Indeed. Resizing a photo and making sure it retains the aspect ratio is something that pretty much any home PC user who's ever rezised a digital photo knows about. So how come the NWN - a publisher - doesn't know about it? Or even, if the person who's job it is to add photos to articles doesn't know, someone in the office must want to point it out, surely?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darren
post Dec 10 2010, 02:00 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,251
Joined: 15-May 09
Member No.: 61



Either that or it was supplied to them like that by the event. Usually see it when done on a phone or compact camera in low resolution. The image quality is often so poor that you need to cheat the software to make it usable.

Or, it the office party today and the editor's drinks cabinet has been raided early.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darren
post Dec 10 2010, 02:05 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,251
Joined: 15-May 09
Member No.: 61



Image size 240px × 197px

The correct proportions should be

240 x 180
263 x 197
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JeffG
post Dec 10 2010, 04:01 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,762
Joined: 14-May 09
Member No.: 56



The link doesn't appear to work any more - it just goes to the home page.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Darren
post Dec 10 2010, 04:04 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,251
Joined: 15-May 09
Member No.: 61



looks like it's been pulled.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
massifheed
post Dec 10 2010, 04:14 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 443
Joined: 1-November 10
Member No.: 1,215



QUOTE (Darren @ Dec 10 2010, 04:04 PM) *
looks like it's been pulled.


Something we said? huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th April 2024 - 01:54 PM