 More NTC Cegal Costs |
  |
 Apr 23 2015, 10:35 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Advanced Member  Group: Members Posts: 6,326 Joined: 20-July 10 From: Wash Common Member No.: 1,011  |
Schedule of payments is published.
Legal bills for March were a further £12,717. This may all be cracks-related, but I understand the Council have some other legal worries too so maybe not all CrackGate. The Council have withheld the schedule of payments for January and February. I've never known them to do this and it raises the obvious question of what it is they're hiding. Exceedingly shabby to withhold the schedule of payments right before an election. -------------------- Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
|
 |
 
|
|
Apr 24 2015, 02:04 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,452 Joined: 31-October 10 Member No.: 1,212 |
QUOTE (Simon Kirby @ Apr 23 2015, 11:35 PM)  Schedule of payments is published. Legal bills for March were a further £12,717. This may all be cracks-related, but I understand the Council have some other legal worries too so maybe not all CrackGate. The Council have withheld the schedule of payments for January and February. I've never known them to do this and it raises the obvious question of what it is they're hiding. Exceedingly shabby to withhold the schedule of payments right before an election. Leopard and spots?  -------------------- Vexatious Candidate?
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 24 2015, 09:38 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 936 Joined: 16-June 12 Member No.: 8,755 |
Perhaps Swift-Hook and chums realise that if they revealed how dishonest and incompetent they had been there would be no chance of re-election.
Indicative of their integrity really isn't it? |
|
|
|
|
Apr 24 2015, 10:02 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 6,326 Joined: 20-July 10 From: Wash Common Member No.: 1,011 |
QUOTE (MontyPython @ Apr 24 2015, 10:38 PM) Perhaps Swift-Hook and chums realise that if they revealed how dishonest and incompetent they had been there would be no chance of re-election. Indicative of their integrity really isn't it? I can hardly believe it, but I think that's precisely what has happened. It is just about possible that it was an error and someone just forgot to include the schedule for January and February, but for me the most likely answer is like you say: there were some embarrassing bills which the Council wanted to suppress before the election. Happy to be proved wrong of course. -------------------- Right an injustice - give Simon Kirby his allotment back!
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 04:42 AM |