QUOTE (On the edge @ Aug 4 2011, 09:31 PM)
Think this suggests we have far too much 'government' in Newbury! We are supposed to have a unitary authority which was supposed to have eliminated the petty squabbling and empire building so beloved of little Councils. It's high time we eliminated the urban parish councils and treated Newbury as the Town it has become. Lets face it, Greenham, Speen, Shaw *** Donnington are simply suburbs of Newbury - not separate habitations.
Unitary Authority meant the abolition of the county council, not parish councils. It was only in Newbury that it was truly unitary because they failed to allow a parish council to replace the borough council when it was amalgamated with the district council.
WBC is a little council - and we see the petty squabbling all the time (mind you we se that in all sizes of council).
Unitary authorities were created out of some ideological scheme that would break up the more powerful county councils and make everything more controllable from Whitehall - fortunately the process failed and most places avoided UAs, sadly not so in Berkshire. There are signs of reversal as tiny councils like WBC are encouraged to share more and more functions with their neighbours - I wonder how long it will be before a single executive organisation is seen as the most efficient way to run the six Berkshire UAs?
The current government is pushing through a Localism Bill that should see a greater role for the parish councils - though their latest planning law proposals go the other way in taking even more power away from local authorities - so you'll probably get you wishes fulfilled as all the fields around the conurbation of Newbury Thatcham disappear under houses over the next 20 years.
Still, not to worry, one day they will redraw the boundaries and we will find ourselves in part of Greater London.