The small amounts the Council has allowed to trickle out does not explain anything of the situation at all, in fact it creates in my mind even more confusion, why will they not explain the gagging contract and how it came about?
Why do they refuse to publish the minutes of a council meeting if they have nothing to hide? The more they insist on not publishing the more is needed to ensure they do publish.
Why, if as they believe, they have left no stone unturned to come to agreement with Simon do they not let ratepayers see the evidence?
Why does a ratepayer have to lose the use of an allotment for pointing out that the council have not issued a fair contract for costs of a plot which appears to have been backed up by Trading Standards.
Why does a ratepayer have to lose the use of an allotment for stating that Self Management would be beneficial to allotmenteers as well as ratepayers? These are the questions to which I want answers to! If all the ratepayers of NTC were classed as vexatious for calling the council bad names and more or less useless then there would be only one class.
That is without touching on questions such as why drains were installed that run uphill and why some of the allotments are used as council car parks? The list could go on and on! These are just a few of the questions that have so far been pushed aside and I and others have been refused answers to?