Welcome to Newburytoday.co.uk’s message boards where you can have your say and share your views on any number of issues.
Anyone can read messages, but only registered users can post messages, reply to messages or create new topics. As part of the free and simple registration, you will be asked to read and conform to the house rules.
To register, click here ……Enjoy the debate. Newbury Today Forum > Categories > Random Rants
Proposed benefit cuts |
|
|
|
Feb 1 2012, 02:17 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 443
Joined: 1-November 10
Member No.: 1,215
|
Was just reading this... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16812185and wondered what people's thoughts were. The example family in the link get approx £30,000 per year in benefit, and could stand to lose £4000 if the cap were introduced. Looking at the family's ougoings I find it hard to have a great deal of sympathy. The guy has been out of work for 10 years (so one wonders why he hasn't retrained or at least found something in that time), they manage to find the funds for a Sky TV subscription - with movies, 200 cigarettes and 24 cans of lager a week. They clearly go without in other areas - they have no car and don't go on holiday every year (although many other people don't either!), but it seems obvious to me that if people are able to be in receipt of the equivalent of a respectable salary (30k is way more than I earn) without, in theory, having to leave the house or even get up in the morning, then we will end up with generations upon generations of families who will simply choose not to work. Cutting benefits so that people can no longer afford to use them to fund Sky TV, 24 cans of lager and 200 fags a week may be the start needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies
|
Feb 1 2012, 07:39 PM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 2,945
Joined: 5-June 09
Member No.: 130
|
Looking at the article it is easy enough to get worked up about the Sky TV, mobiles, fags and booze - cutting those out might fit this family into the £26 limit.
But imagine what the same limit would mean to a family around here, or in London - where £76 a week wouldn't get you a tent, let alone space (just) for a family of eight.
Sure the chap should be retrained which would, ideally see him working - but he lives in North Wales - where the chances of getting a job with his CV must be below zero. If they relocate to somewhere where jobs exist - say Newbury, could he get a job paying enough to support and, notably, to house the family - I doubt it.
The £26k cap will force families to move to places where they can exist on £26k - usually areas with high unemployment. I'm not sure how that will help?
Another simple issue - a family with 6 kids has to survive on £26k in N Wales, a family with 2 kids in the south-east will get the same £26k owing to massively higher housing costs. Is that fair? All unwaged large families must move to sink estates in poverty striken areas.
Unless the government subsidises housing in some other way (eg building thousands of council houses) I can't see how this 'one size fits all' cap will work in any way that could be defined as fair.
|
|
|
|
Guest_xjay1337_*
|
Feb 1 2012, 08:09 PM
|
Guests
|
QUOTE (blackdog @ Feb 1 2012, 07:39 PM) Looking at the article it is easy enough to get worked up about the Sky TV, mobiles, fags and booze - cutting those out might fit this family into the £26 limit.
But imagine what the same limit would mean to a family around here, or in London - where £76 a week wouldn't get you a tent, let alone space (just) for a family of eight.
Sure the chap should be retrained which would, ideally see him working - but he lives in North Wales - where the chances of getting a job with his CV must be below zero. If they relocate to somewhere where jobs exist - say Newbury, could he get a job paying enough to support and, notably, to house the family - I doubt it.
The £26k cap will force families to move to places where they can exist on £26k - usually areas with high unemployment. I'm not sure how that will help?
Another simple issue - a family with 6 kids has to survive on £26k in N Wales, a family with 2 kids in the south-east will get the same £26k owing to massively higher housing costs. Is that fair? All unwaged large families must move to sink estates in poverty striken areas.
Unless the government subsidises housing in some other way (eg building thousands of council houses) I can't see how this 'one size fits all' cap will work in any way that could be defined as fair. So why doesn't he look for jobs nationally and if he gets one then relocate? That's a stupid amount of money to be getting on benefits and after 10 years this guy has clearly got no will to get another job.. Location isn't an excuse really, not when you've been bone idle for a decade. You can happily live in pretty much any area in and around Newbury for a **** of a lot less than £26k...I was on £15k and managed to rent my own place, pay finance, insurance, and what not.. it's not really that hard to look for cheaper places to live.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 2 2012, 01:15 AM
|
Advanced Member
Group: Members
Posts: 2,945
Joined: 5-June 09
Member No.: 130
|
QUOTE (xjay1337 @ Feb 1 2012, 08:09 PM) So why doesn't he look for jobs nationally and if he gets one then relocate? That's a stupid amount of money to be getting on benefits and after 10 years this guy has clearly got no will to get another job.. Location isn't an excuse really, not when you've been bone idle for a decade. You can happily live in pretty much any area in and around Newbury for a **** of a lot less than £26k...I was on £15k and managed to rent my own place, pay finance, insurance, and what not.. it's not really that hard to look for cheaper places to live. If you can keep youirself and your wife (your bipolar wife), and your six kids on £26k paying Newbury rents then I am impressed. One person could easily live on that amount - but eight? That's £3250 each. If I was in that situation I would be seriously p****d off to see the two child family next door getting exactly the same. This cap will force people to move away from the places where the jobs are - making them even less likely to get off their sofas and get a job. I'm not arguing that the benefits system is not overgenerous, just that this cap is an unfair and dumb way of trying to solve the problem.
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
massifheed Proposed benefit cuts Feb 1 2012, 02:17 PM Bloggo QUOTE (massifheed @ Feb 1 2012, 02:17 PM)... Feb 1 2012, 02:30 PM xjay1337 Agree, I saw this and was thinking exactly the sam... Feb 1 2012, 03:25 PM massifheed QUOTE (xjay1337 @ Feb 1 2012, 03:25 PM) .... Feb 1 2012, 04:22 PM stewiegriffin Agree completely, they could and should have their... Feb 1 2012, 04:21 PM xjay1337 QUOTE (blackdog @ Feb 2 2012, 01:15 AM) I... Feb 2 2012, 02:19 AM TallDarkAndHandsome I feel so sorry for this family.
I think there ben... Feb 2 2012, 08:54 AM massifheed QUOTE (xjay1337 @ Feb 2 2012, 02:19 AM) B... Feb 2 2012, 09:26 AM blackdog QUOTE (xjay1337 @ Feb 2 2012, 02:19 AM) N... Feb 2 2012, 05:51 PM xjay1337 QUOTE (blackdog @ Feb 2 2012, 05:51 PM) I... Feb 2 2012, 06:49 PM massifheed QUOTE (blackdog @ Feb 1 2012, 07:39 PM) U... Feb 1 2012, 08:20 PM Andy Capp "I see eight people here having to choose bet... Feb 1 2012, 08:44 PM NWNREADER I've never been on benefits. What is the tax ... Feb 1 2012, 09:32 PM Andy Capp QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Feb 1 2012, 09:32 PM) ... Feb 1 2012, 10:03 PM Strafin Nope, they will probably be getting all that too. ... Feb 1 2012, 10:07 PM Andy Capp QUOTE (Strafin @ Feb 1 2012, 10:07 PM) No... Feb 1 2012, 10:18 PM NWNREADER If benefits are 'cash in hand', how much w... Feb 1 2012, 10:54 PM Andy Capp QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Feb 1 2012, 10:54 PM) ... Feb 1 2012, 11:03 PM NWNREADER QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Feb 1 2012, 10:54 PM) ... Feb 2 2012, 09:44 PM Andy Capp QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Feb 2 2012, 09:44 PM) ... Feb 2 2012, 09:49 PM NWNREADER 'It'? 'Reckless'? You mean the m... Feb 2 2012, 10:10 PM Andy Capp QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Feb 2 2012, 10:10 PM) ... Feb 2 2012, 10:56 PM JeffG I would have gone for the children thing myself, e... Feb 3 2012, 09:59 AM xjay1337 QUOTE (JeffG @ Feb 3 2012, 09:59 AM) I wo... Feb 3 2012, 04:02 PM blackdog QUOTE (xjay1337 @ Feb 3 2012, 04:02 PM) F... Feb 5 2012, 10:40 AM NWNREADER Found this in the Oxford Mail
The vox pop comment... Feb 4 2012, 01:49 PM On the edge QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Feb 4 2012, 01:49 PM) ... Feb 4 2012, 03:12 PM Strafin Actually it's 8 children from two marriages, s... Feb 5 2012, 11:51 AM NWNREADER QUOTE (Strafin @ Feb 5 2012, 11:51 AM) Ac... Feb 5 2012, 12:32 PM blackdog QUOTE (Strafin @ Feb 5 2012, 11:51 AM) Ac... Feb 5 2012, 04:16 PM NWNREADER QUOTE (blackdog @ Feb 5 2012, 04:16 PM) I... Feb 5 2012, 04:26 PM blackdog QUOTE (NWNREADER @ Feb 5 2012, 04:26 PM) ... Feb 5 2012, 06:25 PM xjay1337 How would people feel about imposing a limit on ch... Feb 6 2012, 11:53 AM blackdog QUOTE (xjay1337 @ Feb 6 2012, 11:53 AM) H... Feb 6 2012, 04:42 PM Andy Capp QUOTE (blackdog @ Feb 6 2012, 04:42 PM) I... Feb 6 2012, 06:28 PM EvieG2017 QUOTE (massifheed @ Feb 1 2012, 02:17 PM)... Dec 11 2017, 12:02 PM Andy Capp Yes,there are some scroungers, but not just at the... Dec 11 2017, 03:13 PM newres This family with 7 children is an extreme example,... Dec 11 2017, 03:40 PM Turin Machine If you cap those abusing the system there will be ... Dec 11 2017, 05:38 PM SirWilliam Funnily enough I was debating this very subject wi... Dec 11 2017, 06:45 PM On the edge This is all pretty old stuff; look at the start da... Dec 12 2017, 06:57 AM Andy Capp Benefit scroungers are small fry in cash terms, bu... Dec 12 2017, 09:59 AM Mr Brown From time immemorial, just do sufficient to keep t... Dec 16 2017, 08:59 AM SirWilliam QUOTE (Mr Brown @ Dec 16 2017, 08:59 AM) ... Dec 16 2017, 09:15 AM je suis Charlie QUOTE (Mr Brown @ Dec 16 2017, 08:59 AM) ... Dec 16 2017, 09:41 AM
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|